RCIN and OZwRCIN projects

Object

Title: Behind the scenes of a crowdmapping tool design and implementation: Guidelines for participatory mapping practices in a multicultural environment

Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 97 No. 1 (2024)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Abstract:

This study addresses the gap in knowledge regarding effective design practices for crowdmapping in participatory mapping, considering the diverse agendas, expectations, and needs of stakeholders. Through interviews and analysis of a crowdmapping project, we developed a roadmap and guidelines to inform the design process of a web-based crowdmapping tool. Unlike traditional approaches that focus on end-user evaluation, our paper explores the perspectives of facilitators and developers involved in the participatory process. By understanding their motivations and perceptions, we can plan and design user-friendly tools that meet the requirements of all stakeholders in participatory mapping.

References:

Aditya, T. (2010). Usability issues in applying participatory mapping for neighborhood infrastructure planning. Transactions in GIS, 14(s1), 119-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01206.x DOI
Ahmouda, A., Hochmair, H. H., & Cvetojevic, S. (2018). Analyzing the effect of earthquakes on OpenStreetMap contribution patterns and tweeting activities. Geo-spatial Information Science, 21(3), 195-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2018.1498666 DOI
Alcorn, J. B. (2000). Keys to unleash mapping's good magic. PLA notes, 39(2), 10-13.
Babelon, I., Ståhle, A., & Balfors, B. (2017). Toward Cyborg PPGIS: Exploring socio-technical requirements for the use of web-based PPGIS in two municipal planning cases, Stockholm region, Sweden. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(8), 1366-1390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1221798 DOI
Babelon, I, Pánek, J., Falco, E., Kleinhans, R., & Charlton, J. (2021). Between consultation and collaboration: self-reported objectives for 25 web-based geoparticipation projects in urban planning. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 10(11), 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10110783 DOI
Bartling, M., Havas, C. R., Wegenkittl, S., Reichenbacher, T., & Resch, B. (2021). Modeling patterns in map use Contexts and mobile map design usability. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(8), 527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10080527 DOI
Bąkowska-Waldmann, E. (2023). Residents' experiential knowledge and its importance for decision-making processes in spatial planning: A PPGIS based study. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 12(3), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12030102 DOI
Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406 DOI
Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209104824 DOI
Brown, G., Donovan, S., Pullar, D., Pocewicz, A., Toohey, R., & Ballesteros-Lopez, R. (2014). An empirical evaluation of workshop versus survey PPGIS methods. Applied Geography, 48, 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.008 DOI
Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2018). Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: Toward integration or increased specialization? Applied Geography, 95, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.002 DOI
Brown, G., Raymond, C. M., & Corcoran, J. (2015). Mapping and measuring place attachment. Applied Geography, 57, 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.011 DOI
Brown, G., Reed, P., & Raymond, C. M. (2020). Mapping place values: 10 lessons from two decades of public participation GIS empirical research. Applied Geography, 116, 102156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102156 DOI
Brown, G., Sanders, S., & Reed, P. (2018). Using public participatory mapping to inform general land use planning and zoning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 177, 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.011 DOI
Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2012). Measuring change in place values using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Applied Geography, 34, 316-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.12.007 DOI
Bugs, G., Granell, C., Fonts, O., Huerta, J., & Painho, M. (2010). An assessment of Public Participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil. Cities, 27(3), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.11.008 DOI
Churski, P., Herodowicz, T. Konecka-Szydłowska, B., & Perdał, R. (2021). European Regional Development: Contemporary Regional and Local Perspectives of Socio-Economic and Socio-Political Changes. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84659-6 DOI
Cilliers, E. J., & Timmermans, W. (2014). The importance of creative participatory planning in the public place-making process. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(3), 413-429. https://doi.org/10.1068/b39098 DOI
Corbett, J. (2013). "I Don't Come from Anywhere": Exploring the Role of the Geoweb and Volunteered Geographic Information in Rediscovering a Sense of Place in a Dispersed Aboriginal Community. In D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_13 DOI
Czepkiewicz, M., Brudka, C., Jankowski, P., Kaczmarek, T., Zwoliński, Z., Mikuła, Ł., … & Wójcicki, M. (2016). Public Participation GIS for sustainable urban mobility planning: methods, applications and challenges. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, (35), 9-35. https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/rrpr/article/view/8572
Denwood, T., Huck, J. J., & Lindley, S. (2022). Paper2GIS: improving accessibility without limiting analytical potential in Participatory Mapping. Journal of Geographical Systems. 25(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-022-00386-6 DOI
Elgobashi, A., & Semary, Y. E. (2021). Redefinition of Heritage Public Spaces Using PPGIS. In Architecture in the Age of Disruptive Technologies: Transformations and Challenges. Presented at the 9th ASCAAD Conference, Cairo, 355-370.
European Commission. (2022). Cohesion in Europe towards 2050. Eighth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy.
Fagerholm, N., & Käyhkö, N. (2009). Participatory mapping and geographical patterns of the social landscape values of rural communities in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Fennia - International Journal of Geography, 187(1), 43-60.
Haklay, M. (2006). Usability dimensions in collaborative GIS. In Collaborative Geographic Information Systems (pp. 24-42). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-845-1.ch002 DOI
Haklay, M., & Tobón, C. (2003). Usability evaluation and PPGIS: Towards a user-centred design approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17(6), 577-592. https://doi.org/10.1080/1365881031000114107 DOI
Haltofová, B. (2020). Critical success factors of geocrowdsourcing use in e-government: A case study from the Czech Republic. Urban Research & Practice. 13(4), 434-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2019.1586990 DOI
Haworth, B., Whittaker, J., & Bruce, E. (2016). Assessing the application and value of participatory mapping for community bushfire preparation. Applied Geography, 76, 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.019 DOI
Hawthorne, T. L., Toohy, K. R., Yang, B., Graham, L., Lorenzo, E. M., Torres, H., … & Walters, L. J. (2022). Mapping emotional attachment as a measure of sense of place to identify coastal restoration priority areas. Applied Geography, 138, 102608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102608 DOI
Heikinheimo, V., Tenkanen, H., Bergroth, C., Järv, O., Hiippala, T., & Toivonen, T. (2020). Understanding the use of urban green spaces from user-generated geographic information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 201, 103845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103845 DOI
Hirata, E., Giannotti, M. A., Larocca, A. P. C., & Quintanilha, J. A. (2018). Flooding and inundation collaborative mapping - use of the Crowdmap/Ushahidi platform in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12181 DOI
Jankowski, P., Czepkiewicz, M., Młodkowski, M., Zwoliński, Z., & Wójcicki, M. (2019). Evaluating the scalability of public participation in urban land use planning: A comparison of Geoweb methods with face-to-face meetings. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(3), 511-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317719709 DOI
Jones, L., Holland, R. A., Ball, J., Sykes, T., Taylor, G., Ingwall-King, L., … & S. H. Peh, K. (2020). A place-based participatory mapping approach for assessing cultural ecosystem services in urban green space. People and Nature, 2(1), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10057 DOI
Kahila-Tani, M., Kytta, M., & Geertman, S. (2019). Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices. Landscape and Urban Planning, 186, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.019 DOI
Kingston, R., Carver, S., Evans, A., & Turton, I. (2000). Web-based public participation geographical information systems: An aid to local environmental decision-making. Computers, environment and urban systems, 24(2), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00049-6 DOI
Kivinen, S., Vartiainen, K., & Kumpula, T. (2018). People and Post-Mining Environments: PPGIS Mapping of Landscape Values, Knowledge Needs, and Future Perspectives in Northern Finland. Land, 7(4), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040151 DOI
Krahmer, E., & Ummelen, N. (2004). Thinking about thinking aloud: A comparison of two verbal protocols for usability testing. IEEE transactions on professional communication, 47(2), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2004.828205 DOI
Lehto, C., Hedblom, M., Öckinger, E., & Ranius, T. (2022). Landscape usage by recreationists is shaped by availability: Insights from a national PPGIS survey in Sweden. Landscape and Urban Planning, 227, 104519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104519 DOI
Lupa, P., & Fafgiewicz, K. (2022). Razem można więcej. O współtworzeniu rozwiązań na rzecz klimatu na przykładzie Aglomeracji Poznańskiej. Drzewo Franciszka No. 5-6/2022-2023, 95-101. https://drzewofranciszka.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Magazyn-Drzewo-Franciszka-05_06-1.pdf [Accessed 29 November 2023].
Morse, W. C., Cox, C., & Anderson, C. J. (2020). Using public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS) to identify valued landscapes vulnerable to sea level rise. Sustainability, 12(17), 6711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176711 DOI
Müller, J. (2021). Evaluation methods for citizen design science studies: How do planners and citizens obtain relevant information from map-based e-participation tools? ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10020048 DOI
Muñoz, L., Hausner, V. H., Runge, C., Brown, G., & Daigle, R. (2020). Using crowdsourced spatial data from Flickr vs. PPGIS for understanding nature's contribution to people in Southern Norway. People and Nature, 2(2), 437-449. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10083 DOI
Newman, G., Zimmerman, D., Crall, A., Laituri, M., Graham, J., & Stapel, L. (2010). User-friendly web mapping: Lessons from a citizen science website. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(12), 1851-1869. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2010.490532 DOI
Nivala, A. M., Brewster, S., & Sarjakoski, T. L. (2008). Usability evaluation of web mapping sites. The Cartographic Journal, 45(2), 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1179/174327708X305120 DOI
Nuojua, J., & Kuutti, K. (2008). Communication based web mapping: A new approach for acquisition of local knowledge for urban planning. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Entertainment and media in the ubiquitous era (pp. 136-140). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1457199.1457229 DOI
Olafsson, A. S., Purves, R. S., Wartmann, F. M., Garcia-Martin, M., Fagerholm, N., Torralba, M., … & Raymond, C. M. (2022). Comparing landscape value patterns between participatory mapping and geolocated social media content across Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 226, 104511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104511 DOI
Pánek, J. (2016). From mental maps to GeoParticipation. The Cartographic Journal, 53(4), 300-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2016.1243862 DOI
Pánek, J., Marek, L., Pászto, V., & Valůch, J. (2017). The crisis map of the Czech Republic: The nationwide deployment of an Ushahidi application for disasters. Disasters, 41(4), 649-671. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12221 DOI
Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, A., Czepkiewicz, M., & Kronenberg, J. (2017). Eliciting non-monetary values of formal and informal urban green spaces using public participation GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning, 160, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.012 DOI
Prutzer, N. (2019). The mapping crowd: Macrotask crowdsourcing in disaster response. In V. J. Khan, K. Papangelis, I. Lykourentzou, & P. Markopoulos (Eds.), Macrotask Crowdsourcing (pp. 253-275). Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12334-5_10 DOI
Quattrone, G., Capra, L., & De Meo, P. (2015). There's no such thing as the perfect map: Quantifying bias in spatial crowd-sourcing datasets. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 1021-1032. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675235 DOI
Rall, E., Hansen, R., & Pauleit, S. (2019). The added value of public participation GIS (PPGIS) for urban green infrastructure planning. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40, 264-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.016 DOI
Rieckmann, M., Hoff, H., & Bokop, K. (2021). Effective community-academic partnerships on climate change adaption and mitigation: Results of a European Delphi Study. Sustainability and Climate Change, 14(2), 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1089/scc.2020.0061 DOI
Rzeszewski, M., & Kotus, J. (2019). Usability and usefulness of internet mapping platforms in participatory spatial planning. Applied Geography, 103, 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.01.001 DOI
Schroeder, P. (1996). Criteria for the Design of a GIS/2. http://www.commoncoordinates.com/ppgis/criteria.htm
See, L., Mooney, P., Foody, G., Bastin, L., Comber, A., Estima, J., … & Rutzinger, M. (2016). Crowdsourcing, citizen science or volunteered geographic information? The Current State of Crowdsourced Geographic Information. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(5), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5050055 DOI
Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x DOI
Skarlatidou, A., Haklay, M., and Cheng, T. (2011). Trust in Web GIS: The role of the trustee attributes in the design of trustworthy Web GIS applications. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25(12), 1913-1930. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.557379 DOI
Steinhaus, N., Hoff, H., Churski, P., Coquard, C., & Pfleger, A. (2021). Eine Interaktive Beteiligungskarte Für Innovatives Klimahandeln in Europa. Standort, 45(4), 272-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00548-021-00745-3 DOI
Zhang, S. (2019). Public participation in the Geoweb era: Defining a typology for geo-participation in local governments. Cities, 85, 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.004. DOI

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

97

Issue:

1

Start page:

5

End page:

21

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:240953 ; 0016-7282 (print) ; 2300-7362 (online) ; 10.7163/GPol.0266

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Access:

Open

Object collections:

Last modified:

Apr 9, 2024

In our library since:

Apr 8, 2024

Number of object content downloads / hits:

266

All available object's versions:

https://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/publication/277260

Show description in RDF format:

RDF

Show description in RDFa format:

RDFa

Show description in OAI-PMH format:

OAI-PMH

Objects Similar

×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information