Object structure
Title:

Urban governance systems in autonomous territories of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy: The cases of Croatia-Slavonia and Austrian Galicia (1867-1918)

Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 97 No. 1 (2024)

Creator:

Hilbert, Bálint : Autor Affiliation ORCID

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Date issued/created:

2024

Description:

24 cm

Subject and Keywords:

urban governance ; territorial autonomy ; metagovernance ; historical geography ; Croatia-Slavonia ; Habsburg Galicia ; Austro-Hungarian Monarchy

Abstract:

There is still no consensus on the definition of urban governance, which can be attributed to gaps in its empirical foundation across both time and space. The Austro-Hungarian Monarchy (1867-1918), with its complex state structure, serves as an ideal historical and geographical subject for unveiling aspects related to the birth of modern urban governance within a Central European context. To conduct comparative research, this study examines selected cities from two territorial autonomies of the empire: Zagreb, Osijek, VaraĹždin, and Zemun from Croatia-Slavonia, and Lviv and Cracow (Krakow) from Galicia. Urban governance within territorial autonomy, particularly from a historical standpoint, is a unique subject that lacks a substantial presence in the literature of urban studies and territorial autonomy. In this paper, an analytical framework was developed based on the key components of the transformation thesis of urban governance and metagovernance theory. The findings of the study indicate that the process of designating territorial autonomies and the various political factors behind them significantly shaped the formation of urban governance systems.

References:

ACR. (1881). 1881. évi január hó 28-án kelt törvény a horvát- és szlavónországi városi községek szervezetéről (Act on the organization of urban municipalities in Croatia and Slavonia). Act of the Croatian Sabor of 28 January, 1881.
ACR. (1886). 1886. évi február hó 5-én kelt törvény mellyel a horvát- és szlavónországi városi községek szervezetéről szóló 1881. évi január hó 28-án kelt törvény némely határozmányai módosíttatnak, illetve kiegészíttetnek (Act on amending and supplementing certain provisions of the Act of January 28, 1881 on the organization of urban municipalities in Croatia and Slavonia). Act of the Croatian Sabor of 5 February, 1886.
ACR. (1895). 1895. évi június hó 21-én kelt törvény a horvát- és szlavónországi városi községek szervezetéről (Act on the organization of urban municipalities in Croatia and Slavonia). Act of the Croatian Sabor of 21 June, 1895.
Andrew, C., & Goldsmith, M. (1998). From local government to local governance? - and beyond. International Political Science Review, 19(2), 101-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251298019002002 DOI
Bailey, D., & Wood, M. (2017). The metagovernance of English devolution. Local Government Studies, 43(6), 966-991. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1359165 DOI
Barter, S. J. (2017). Rethinking territorial autonomy. Regional Studies, 52(2), 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1366651 DOI
Berg-Nordlie, M. (2018). The governance of urban indigenous spaces: Norwegian Sámi examples. Acta Borealia, 35(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08003831.2018.1457316 DOI
Bernhardt, R. (1981). Federalism and Autonomy. In Y. Dinstein (Ed.), Models of Autonomy (pp. 23-28). New Brunswick-London: Tel Aviv University (Faculty of Law) - Transaction Books.
Bibl, V. (Ed.), (1924). Der Zerfall Österreichs, II. Band: Von Revolution zu Revolution 1848-1918 (The disintegration of Austria, Volume II: from revolution to revolution 1848-1918). Vienna: Rikola Verlag.
Braudel, F. (1984). The Perspective of the World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Brauneder, W. (Ed.), (1994). Osztrák alkotmánytörténet napjainkig (Constitutional history of Austria). Pécs: Janus Pannonius Tudományegyetem.
Brenner, N. (Ed.), (2004). New State Spaces, Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199270057.001.0001 DOI
Cederman, L.-E., Hug, S., Schädel, A., & Wucherpfennig, J. (2015). Territorial autonomy in the shadow of conflict: Too little, too late? American Political Science Review, 109(2), 354-370. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055415000118 DOI
Čepulo, D. (2002). The press and jury trial legislation of the Croatian Diet 1875-1907: Liberalism, fear of democracy and Croatian autonomy. Parliaments, Estates and Representation, 22(1), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02606755.2002.9522149 DOI
Čepulo, D. (2010). Centralisation, modernisation and nation-building in Croatia and Slavonia: Reforms of the county system 1848-1918. In Coelho, R. (Ed.), Parliaments: The law, the practice and the representations. From the Middle Ages to the Present Day (pp. 143-149). Lisbon: Assembleia da Republica, Universidade de Coimbra.
Cieger, A. (Ed.). (2004). A kiegyezés [Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867]. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.
Ciuciura, T. (1985). Provincial politics in the Habsburg empire: The case of Galicia and Bukovina. Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 13(2), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905998508408024 DOI
Da Cruz, N. F., Rode, P., & McQuarrie, M. (2018). New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1499416 DOI
Davies, N. (Ed.). (2006). Lengyelország története (The history of Poland). Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.
Dear, M., & Dahmann, N. (2008). Urban politics and the Los Angeles School of Urbanism. Urban Affairs Review, 44(2), 266-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087408320240 DOI
DiGaetano, A. (2009). The birth of modern urban governance: A comparison of political modernization in Boston, Massachusetts, and Bristol, England, 1800-1870. Journal of Urban History, 35(2), 259-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144208327914 DOI
DiGaetano, A., & Klemanski, J. S. (Eds.). (1999). Power and City Governance. Comparative Perpectives on Urban Development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dinstein, Y. (1981). Autonomy. In Y. Dinstein (Ed.), Models of Autonomy (pp. 291-303). New Brunswick-London: Tel Aviv University (Faculty of Law) - Transaction Books.
Eckardt, F., & Elander, I. (Eds.). (2009). Urban Governance in Europe. Berlin: Berliner WissenschaftsVerlag.
Fairbanks, R. B. (1999). Rethinking urban problems, planning, zoning, and city government in Dallas, 1900-1930. Journal of Urban History, 25(6), 809-837. https://doi.org/10.1177/009614429902500602 DOI
Frank, A. F. (Ed.). (2007). Oil Empire, Visions of Prosperity in Austrian Galicia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674037182 DOI
Ghai, Y. (2000). Ethnicity and Autonomy: A Framework for Analysis. In Y. Ghai (Ed.), Autonomy and Ethnicity: Negotiating Competing Claims in Multi-ethnic States (pp. 1-26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511560088.001 DOI
Gjaltema, J., Biesbroek, R., & Termeer, K. (2019). From government to governance…to meta-governance: A systematic literature review. Public Management Review, 22(12), 1760-1780. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1648697 DOI
Goldsmith, M., & Garrand, J. (2000). Urban governance: Some reflections. In J. Morris, & H. Trainor (Eds.), Urban Governance: Britain and Beyond since 1750 (pp. 15-27). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315235271-2 DOI
GS. (1861). Landes-Ordnung und Landtags-Wahlordnung für das Königreich Galizien und Lodomerien sammt dem Herzogthume Krakau (Regulations on the state government and the election of the state parliament for the Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria together with the Duchy of Kraków). Reichsgesetzblatt 1849-1918, 28 February, 1861, No. 20.
GS. (1862). Gesetz vom 5. März 1862, womit die grundsätzlichen Bestimmungen zur Regelung des Gemeindewesens vorgezeichnet werden (Act of March 5, 1862, which specifies the basic provisions for the regulation of municipal affairs). Reichsgesetzblatt 1849-1918, 5. March 1862, No. 18.
GS. (1866). Gesetz über die Gemeinde-Statuten der Stadt Krakau [Act on Municipal Statute of the City of Cracow]. Landesgesetzblatt Galizien 1772-1918, 13 April 1866, No. 7
GS. (1870). Gesetz, betreffend das Gemeinde-Statut für die Hauptstadt Lemberg (Act concerning the municipal statute for the capital of Lviv). Landesgesetzblatt Galizien 1772-1918, 1 November, 1870, No. 79.
GS. (1901). Gesetz, womit für die königl. Haupstadt Krakau ein Gemeindestatut erlassen wird (Act on adopting a municipal statute for the royal capital of Cracow). Landesgesetzblatt Galizien 1772-1918, 20 December, 1901, No. 108.
Haid, E. (2017). Galicia: A bulwark against Russia? Propaganda and violence in a border region during the First World War. European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire, 24(2), 200-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2016.1257574 DOI
Hanley, A. G. (2012). A failure to deliver: Municipal poverty and the provision of public services in Imperial São Paulo, Brazil 1822-1889. Journal of Urban History, 39(3), 513-535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144212440886 DOI
Hantsch, H. (Ed.). (1968). Die Geschichte Österreichs, II. Band:1648-1918 (The history of Austria, Volume II.: 1648-1918). Graz: Verlag Styria.
Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 1, 3-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/490503 DOI
Hilbert, B. (2016). Ausztria és Magyarország migrációs kapcsolata a dualizmus idején (1870-1910) [Migration relations between Austria and Hungary during the era of Dualism (1870-1910)]. Földrajzi Közlemények, 140(4), 362-375.
Hilbert, B. (2021). Városi kormányzás történeti perspektívában? A dualizmuskori Bécs és Budapest példája (1867-1918) [Urban governance in a historical perspective? The case studies of Vienna and Budapest during the period of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy (1867-1918)]. Tér és Társadalom, 1, 136-157. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.35.1.3248 DOI
Hilbert, B. (2023). A modern (polgári) városi kormányzás születése Közép-Európában - Az Osztrák- Magyar Monarchia városainak földrajzi jogtudományi vizsgálata (1867-1918) [The birth of modern urban governance in Central Europe - Legal geographical study of the cities of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy (1867-1918)]. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University, Doctoral School of Earth Sciences.
Himka, J.-P. (1988). Galician Villagers and the Ukrainian National Movement in the Nineteenth Century. Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta. DOI
Hołuj, D. (2013). Samorząd miejski Krakowa i Lwowa w okresie autonomii galicyjskiej (Cracow and Lviv Municipal Governments during Galician Autonomy). Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, 17, 89-108.
Hrytsak, Y. (2000). Lviv: A Multicultural History through the Centuries. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 24, 47-73.
Jelavich, B. (Ed.), (1983). History of the Balkans, Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI
Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: A state-theoretical perspective. Antipode, 3, 452-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00250
Jessop, B. (Ed.). (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Juon, A., & Bochsler, D. (2023). The wrong place at the wrong time? Territorial autonomy and conflict during regime transitions. Comparative Political Studies, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140231168365 DOI
K. K. Statistische Zentralkommission. (1912). Die Ergebnisse der Volkszählung vom 31. Dezember 1910 in den im Reichsrate vertretenen Königreichen und Ländern: Band II., 1. Heft: Heimatrechtsverhältnisse (The results of the census of 31. December 1910 in the kingdoms and countries represented in the Reichsrat: Volume II., Booklet 1.: Place of origin). Vienna: Kaiserlich-Königlichen Hof- und Staatsdrückerei. https://alex.onb.ac.at/cgi-content/alex?aid=ost&datum=0002&page=3&size=45
Kann, R. A. (1974). A History of the Habsburg Empire 1526-1918. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520341685 DOI
Katus, L. (Ed.), (2012). A modern Magyarország születése, Magyarország története 1711-1914 (The birth of modern Hungary, the history of Hungary 1711-1914). Pécs: Kronosz Kiadó.
Klabouch, J. (1968). Die Gemeindeselbstverwaltung in Österreich 1848-1918 (Municipal self-government in Austria 1848-1918). Wien: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik.
Kos, W., Purchla, J., Komar, Ż., Rydiger, M., Schwarz, W. M., Astelbauer, … & Kotyńska, K. (2015): Mythos Galizien. Wien: Wien Museum.
Kovács, I. (1981). Amikor Krakkó állam volt (When Cracow was a state). Tiszatáj, 35(6), 29-37.
Kössler, K. (2018). Governing divided societies through territorial autonomy? From (too) great expectations to a contextualist view. Treatises and Documents, Journal of Ethnic Studies, 81, 21-41.
Krišto, J. (2005). Croatian political turmoils in the dusk of Austro-Hungarian monarchy. Review of Croatian history, 1(1), 73-94.
Kuzmany, B. (2015). The rise and limits of participation. The political representation of Galicia's Urban Jewry from the Josephine Era to the 1914 Electoral Reform. East Central Europe, 42(2-3), 216-248. DOI
Kuzmany, B. (2016). Habsburg Austria: Experiments in non-territorial autonomy. Ethnopolitics, 15(1), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2015.1101838 DOI
LA. (1872). 1872. évi XXXVI. törvénycikk Buda-Pest fővárosi törvényhatóság alakitásáról és rendezéséről (XXXVI. legal article of 1872 on the formation and organization of the capital municipality of BudaPest). Act of the Hungarian parliament, assented by the emperor in 22 December, 1872.
LA. (1886). 1886. évi XXI. törvénycikk a törvényhatóságokról (XXI. legal article on the counties and Municipalities). Act of the Hungarian parliament, assented by the emperor in 27 June, 1886.
LA. (1886). 1886. évi XXII. törvénycikk a községekről (XXII. legal article on the municipalities). Act of the Hungarian parliament, assented by the emperor in 27 June, 1886.
Lo, C. (2017). Between government and governance: Opening the black box of the transformation thesis. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(8), 650-656. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1295261 DOI
Lucas, J. (2017). Patterns of urban governance: A sequence analysis of long-term institutional change in six Canadian cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39, 68-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12291 DOI
MacLeod, G. (2011). Urban politics reconsidered: Growth machine to post-democratic city? Urban Studies, 48(12), 2629-2660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011415715 DOI
Marcus, A. I. (1980). The strange career of municipal health initiatives, Cincinnati and City Government in the early nineteenth Century. Journal of Urban History, 7(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/009614428000700101 DOI
Marušić, M. (Ed.), (2020). Croatia: Past, Present and Future Perspectives. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Matković, S. (2010). Parliamentary elections at the turn of the nineteenth century in Croatia. Parliaments, Estates and Representation, 22(1), 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02606755.2002.9522150 DOI
Mezey, B. (Ed.), (2004). Magyar jogtörténet (Legal history of Hungary). Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.
Miklósné, A. Z. (2010). Autonómia: Elmélet és gyakorlat (Autonomy: theory and practice). Tér és Társadalom, 24(3), 75-91. DOI
Miller, N. (1995). Two strategies in Serbian politics in Croatia and Hungary before the first world war. Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 23(2), 327-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905999508408379 DOI
Morris, J. R. (2000). Governance: Two centuries of urban growth. In J. Morris, H. Trainor (Eds.), Urban Governance: Britain and Beyond since 1750 (pp. 1-14). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315235271-1 DOI
Oberreuter, H. (1985). Autonomy. In Staatslexikon. Vol. 1. Freiburg: Verlag Herder.
Osborne, D, & Gaebler, T. (Eds.), (1992). Re-inventing Government. New York: Addison Wesley.
Pajakowski, P. (1993). The Polish Club, Badeni, and the Austrian Parliamentary Crisis of 1897. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 35(1-2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.1993.11092017 DOI
Pierre, J. (1999). Models of urban governance: The institutional dimension of urban politics. Urban Affairs Review, 3, 372-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922183988 DOI
Pierre, J. (2005). Comparative urban governance: Uncovering complex causalities. Urban Affairs Review, 4, 446-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087404273442 DOI
Purchla, J. (2007). Małopolska or Galicia: Cracow's Dilemmas in Central Europe. In T. Hayashi, F. Hiroshi (Eds.), Regions in Central and Eastern Europe: Past and Present (pp. 255-271). Sapporo: Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2012). Waves of Governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp. 33-48). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560530.013.0003 DOI
Rothchild, D., & Hartzell, C. A. (1999). Security in deeply divided societies: The role of territorial autonomy. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 5(3-4), 254-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537119908428579 DOI
Safran, W. (1999). Spatial and functional dimensions of autonomy: Cross-national and theoretical perspectives. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 5(3-4), 11-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537119908428568 DOI
Sarlós, B. (Ed.), (1976). Közigazgatás és Hatalompolitika a Dualizmus Rendszerében [Public Administration and Politics of Power in the System of Dualism]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Sellers, J. M. (2002). The Nation-State and Urban Governance. Toward Multilevel Analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 5, 611-641. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808740203700501 DOI
SF. (1872). Fiume szabad város és kerületének statútuma [The statute of the Free City of Fiume and its district]. Act of the Hungarian parliament, assented by the emperor in 1 June, 1872.
Slack, E., & Côté, A. (Eds.), (2014). Comparative urban governance. London: Foresight, Government Office for Science.
Sohn, L. B. (1981). Models of Autonomy within the United Nations Framework. In Y. Dinstein (Ed.), Models of Autonomy (pp. 5-22). New Brunswick-London: Tel Aviv University (Faculty of Law) - Transaction Books.
Sokcsevits, D. (Ed.), (2011). Horvátország a 7. századtól napjainkig [Croatia from the 7th century till nowadays]. Budapest: Mundus Novus Könyvek.
Somogyi, É. (Ed.), (1996): Kormányzati rendszer a dualista Habsburg Monarchiában (System of government in the dualist Habsburg Monarchy). Budapest: História.
Somogyi, É. (2004). A dualizmus megítélésének változásai az osztrák történetírásban [Changes in the perception of Dualism in Austrian historiography]. In A. Cieger (Ed.), A kiegyezés [Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867] (pp. 470-475). Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2016). Metagoverning collaborative innovation in governance networks. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(7), 826-839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016643181 DOI
Stewart, S. (2001). Autonomy as a mechanism for conflict regulation? The case of Crimea. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 7(4), 113-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537110108428647 DOI
Stoker, G. (1998). Public-Private Partnerships and Urban Governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Partnerships in Urban Governance, European and American Experiences (pp. 34-51). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14408-2_3 DOI
Stone, C. (Ed.), (1989). Regime Politics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Suso, R. (Ed.), (2010). Territorial Autonomy and Self-Determination Conflicts: Opportunity and Willingness Cases from Bolivia, Niger, and Thailand. Barcelona: International Catalan Institute for Peace, Working Paper No. 2010/1.
Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Authoritarian Governance, Power and the Politics of Rescaling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9s DOI
Szente, Z. (Ed.), (2011). Kormányzás a dualizmus korában (Governance in the Age of Dualism). Budapest: Atlantisz Kiadó.
Tefner, Z. (Ed.), (2007). Az Osztrák-Magyar Monarchia lengyelpolitikája 1867-1914 (The Polish policy of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy 1867-1914). Budapest: L'Harmattan Kiadó.
Torfing, J. B., Peters, G., Pierre, J., & Sörensen, E. (Eds.), (2012). Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199596751.001.0001 DOI
Van Den Dool, L. (Ed.). (2015). The Quest for Good Urban Governance. Theoretical Reflections and International Practices. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. DOI
Wolff, L. (Ed.). (2010). The Idea of Galicia, History and Fantasy in Habsburg Political Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804774291 DOI

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

97

Issue:

1

Start page:

23

End page:

46

Resource type:

Text

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Resource Identifier:

0016-7282 (print) ; 2300-7362 (online) ; 10.7163/GPol.0267

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Access:

Open

×

Citation

Citation style: