RCIN and OZwRCIN projects

Object

Title: Poziom wykształcenia zasobów wiejskiej siły roboczej w Polsce. Analiza przestrzenna = Education level of rural workforce in Poland. Spatial anatysis

Creator:

Kamińska, Wioletta ORCID

Date issued/created:

2016

Resource type:

Text

Subtitle:

Studia Obszarów Wiejskich = Rural Studies, t. 41

Publisher:

PAN IGiPZ ; PTG

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to determine diversification of rural workforce education level in Poland. The research includes comparison regarding education level of these resources in rural-urban system allowing to identify regularity in location of rural workforce characterized by a particular education level. It was assumed in that workforce resources comprise of people at working age. Basing on research findings it may be stated that education level of rural workforce was lower than that in cities and Poland in general, yet compared to 2002 it has improved significantly. Formal qualifications of rural inhabitants at mobile age were higher than of those at immobile age. Distribution of rural labor force with higher and secondary education referred to the location of agglomeration. The proximity of urban and non-agricultural functions were factors contributing to  the accumulation of well-educated personnel, as well as remote areas of routes and diverse urban labor markets included areas of high quality human capital outflow. The study also confirmed that agriculture, particularly in areas with predominance (in the past) of state farms unfavorable education structure of labor force has been perpetuated.

References:

1. Acemoglu D., 1996, Microfoundation for Social Increasing Returns in Human Capital Accumulation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111 (3), s. 779–804.
2. Arandarenko M., Bartlett W., (red.), 2012, Labour Market and Skills in the Western Balkans, FREN & LSEE, Belgrad.
3. Arrow K., 1962, The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing, Review of Economic School Studies, 29, s. 155–173.
4. Atkinson R., 2003, Introduction. Misunderstood Saviour or Vengeful Wrecker? The Many Meanings and Problems of Gentrification, Urban Studies, 40, 12, s. 2343–2350.
5. Autor D.H., Levy F., Murnane R., 2003, The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 4, s. 1279–1333.
6. Baran E., 2011, Wiejskie obszary depopulacji w Polsce. Przykład Polski Południowo-Wschodniej, [w:] W. Kamińska, K. Heffner (red.), Obszary wiejskie: wielofunkcyjność, migracje, nowe wizje rozwoju, Studia KPZK PAN, 133, Warszawa, s. 197–213.
7. Bartlett W., 2013, Skill Mismatch, Education Systems, and Labour Markets in EU Neighbourhood Policy Countries, Search Working Paper, 20.
8. Barro R.J., Lee J.W., 1996, International Measures of Schooling Years and Schooling Quality, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 86, s. 218–223.
9. Becker G.S., 1964, Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10. Berman E., Bound J., Griliches Z., 1994, Changes in the Demand for Skilled Labor within U. S. Manufacturing Industries: Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufacturers, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, s. 67–397.
11. Berman E., Bound J., Machin S., 1998, Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, s. 1245–1279.
12. Bresnahan T.F., Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L.M., 2002, Information Technology, Workplace Organization and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, s. 339–376.
13. Caselli F., Esquivel G., Lefort F., 1996, Reopening the Convergence Debate: A New Look at CrossCountry Growth Empirics, Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, 1 (3), s. 363–389.
14. Ciok S., Ilnicki D., 2012, Demograficzne i przestrzenne uwarunkowania rynku pracy na wsi dolnośląskiej, [w:] W. Kamińska, K. Heffner (red), Wiejskie rynki pracy – zasoby, aktywizacja, nowe struktury, Studia KPZK PAN, 145, Warszawa, s. 142–162.
15. De Barros R.P., Ferreira F.H.G., Vega J.R.M., Chanduvi J.S., 2009, Measuring Inequality of Opportunities in Latin America and the Caribbean, World Bank, Washington.
16. De la Fuente A., Ciccone A., 2003, Human Capital in a Global and Knowledge-Based Economy, UFAE and IAE Working Papers 562.03, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
17. Denison E.F., 1971, Education, Economic Growth, and Gaps in Information, [w:] R. A. Wykstra (red.), Education and the Economics of Human Capital, Collier-Macmillan, London, s. 124–128
18. Denny K., O'Sullivan V., 2007, Can Education Compensate for Low Ability?: Evidence From The British Data, Applied Economics Letters, 14, 9, s. 657–660.
19. Fierla I., 1979, Geografia przemysłu Polski, PWE, Warszawa.
20. Freeman R.B., 1986, Demand for Education, [w:] O. Ashenfelter, R. Layard (red.), Handbook of Labour Economics, 1, Elsevier, New York, s. 357–386.
21. Grzeszczak J., 2010, Gentryfikacja osadnictwa – charakterystyka, rozwój koncepcji badawczej i przegląd wyjaśnień, Monografie IGiPZ PAN, 11, Warszawa.
22. Hanushek E.A., Woessmann L., 2008, The Role of Cognitive Skills in Economic Development, Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 3, s. 607–668.
23. Heffner K., 2015, Zmiany przestrzenne na obszarach wiejskich w Polsce w okresie 2004–2014 i do 2020 roku, referat wygłoszony na XXXI Seminarium Geografii Wsi – Obszary wiejskie – pierwsza dekada w Unii Europejskiej i nowa perspektywa, Opole, 27 kwietnia 2015 r.
24. Heffner K., Marszał T., (red.), 2011, Rewitalizacja, gentryfikacja i problemy rozwoju małych miast, Studia KPZK PAN, 136, Warszawa.
25. Herbst M., 2004, Zróżnicowanie jakości kapitału ludzkiego w Polsce. Od czego zależą wyniki edukacyjne, Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 3 (17), s. 89–104.
26. Heston A., Summers R., Aten B., 2002, Penn World, Table Version 6.1, Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pensylwania (CICUP).
27. Hrušek V., (red.), 2015, Post-Agricultural Rural Space of the Visegrad Countries: Economies, Entrepreneurship and Policies, Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, 39.
28. Janc K., Czapiewski K., 2005, Wykształcenie czynnikiem wspierającym rozwój gospodarczy obszarów wiejskich, Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, 8, s. 69–84.
29. Jimenez E., Nguyen V., Patrinos H.A., 2012, Stock in the Middle? Human Capital Development and Economic Growth in Malaysia and Thailand Policy Research Working Papers, 6283, The World Bank Human Development Network Education Unit.
30. Kacprzak E., 2010, Przestrzenne zróżnicowanie kapitału ludzkiego i społecznego na obszarach wiejskich woj. wielkopolskiego, [w:] W. Kamińska, K. Heffner (red), Kapitał ludzki i społeczny w procesie rozwoju obszarów wiejskich, Studia KPZK PAN, 126, Warszawa, s. 161–180.
31. Kamińska W., 2011, Kapitał ludzki i społeczny na obszarach wiejskich w Polsce. Przykład województwa świętokrzyskiego, IG UJK, Kielce.
32. Kamińska W., 2011, Aktywność gospodarcza osób fizycznych na obszarach wiejskich w Polsce, [w:] W. Kamińska, K. Heffner, (red.), Obszary wiejskie: wielofunkcyjność, migracje, nowe wizje rozwoju, Studia KPZK PAN, 133, Warszawa, s. 103–127.
33. Kamińska W., 2014, Przemiany struktury i poziomu wykształcenia ludności wiejskiej w Polsce w latach 2002–2011, [w:] W. Kamińska, K. Heffner (red.), Polityka spójności UE a rozwój obszarów wiejskich: stare problemy i nowe wyzwania, Studia KPZK PAN, 154, Warszawa, s. 129–167.
34. Kamińska W., Heffner K., (red.), 2012, Wiejskie rynki pracy – zasoby, aktywizacji, nowe struktury, Studia KPZK PAN, 145, Warszawa.
35. Karoly L.A., 2010, The Role of Education in Preparing Graduates for the Labor Market in the GCC Countries, Working Paper, Rand, Arlington.
36. Karoly L.A., Panis C.W.A., 2004, The 21st Century at Work: Forces Shaping the Future Workforce and Workplace in the United States, MG-164, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
37. Kendrick J.W., 1961, Productivity Trends in the United States, A Study by the National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton University Press, New York.
38. Kirchhoff B.A., Newbert S.L., Hasan I., Armington C., 2007, The Influence of University R&D Expenditures on New Business Formations and Employment Growth, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, July, s. 543–559.
39. Komornicki T., Czapiewski K., 2010, Dostępność przestrzenna do ośrodków akademickich a poziom kapitału ludzkiego na obszarach wiejskich Mazowsza, [w:] W. Kamińska, K. Heffner, (red.), Kapitał ludzki i społeczny w procesie rozwoju obszarów wiejskich, Studia KPZK PAN, 126, Warszawa, s. 66–85.
40. Kulikowski R., 2002, Problemy społeczne wsi i rolnictwa w Polsce, Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, 2, s. 9–17.
41. Labour Markets and Employability: Trends and Challenges in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, 2011, European Training Foundation, Turin.
42. Lucas R., 1988, On the Mechanics of Economics Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, s. 3–42.
43. McMahon W.W., 2001, The Impact of Human Capital on Non-Market Outcomes and Feedbacks on Economic Development, [w:]: J. F. Helliwell (red.), The Contribution a Human and Social Capital to Sustained Economic Growth and Well Being, Hull Quebec, Government of Canada.
44. Miller H.P., 1960, Annual and Lifetime Income in Relation to Education, American Economic Review, 50, s. 962–986.
45. Nelson R., Phelps E., 1966, Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Economic Growth, American Economic Review, 56, s. 69–75.
46. Neycheva M., 2013, Does Higher Level of Education of Labor Force Cause Growth. Evidence from Bulgaria, Eco Change Restruct, 46, s. 321–339.
47. Parsons D., 1980, Rural Gentrification: the Influence of Rural Settlement Planning Policies, Departamnet of Geography, University of Sussex, Brigton.
48. Petrolongo B., Pissarides C., 2001, Looking into the Black Box: A Survey of the Matching Function, Journal of Economic Literature, 39, s. 390–431.
49. Philips M., 1993, Rural Gentrification and the Process of Class Colonization, Journal of Rural Studies, 9, s. 123–140.

Relation:

Studia Obszarów Wiejskich

Volume:

41

Start page:

9

End page:

30

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

File size 4,1 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:59954 ; 1642-4689 ; 10.7163/SOW.41.1

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call no. Cz.4488 ; CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call no. Cz.4489 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

pol

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 3.0 PL license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 3.0 PL] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 3.0 PL license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure ; European Union. European Regional Development Fund

Access:

Open

Object collections:

Last modified:

Dec 14, 2021

In our library since:

Oct 28, 2016

Number of object content downloads / hits:

2102

All available object's versions:

https://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/publication/79421

Show description in RDF format:

RDF

Show description in RDFa format:

RDFa

Show description in OAI-PMH format:

OAI-PMH

Objects Similar

×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information