RCIN and OZwRCIN projects


Title: Participation and management in Protected Natural Areas in Spain: a perspective from social capital and territorial development


Local development in urban and rural space: project and planning ; Studia Obszarów Wiejskich = Rural Studies, t. 38



Place of publishing:



24 cm

Type of object:



This contribution forms part of the framework of the CasoNatura research project in order to analyse the social trust in two protected natural areas of Castilla-La Mancha region (Spain). It aims to assess contexts of legitimacy for the Government and management of the space between the agents and institutions. Furthermore, it tries to detect the level of territorial identity which has the population with regard to their municipality, natural space and supra-local scales. Conflict detection of environmental, social and economic nature and how to manage them will be analysed and assessed through methodologies including both bibliographical and documentary sources and qualitative techniques of socio-territorial analysis: surveys of the local population and Governing Board of the Park, interviews with "qualified informants" and interviews with organisations/institutions located in the territory in question.


1. Árnason A., Shucksmith M., Vergunst J. (eds.), 2009, Comparing Rural Development. Continuity and Change in the Countryside of Western Europe, Perspectives on rural policy and planning Series, United Kingdom, Ashgate.
2. Bryden J. M.,1998, Development strategies for remote rural regions: What do we know so far?, paper presented to the OECD International Conference on Remote Rural Areas: Developing through Natural and Cultural Assets, Albarracín, Spain, 5–6 November 1998.
3. Caro J., Díaz S., Sunyer Lachiondo C., Vi-uela J., 2009, Contribución del Parque Nacional de Caba-eros al Desarrollo Rural del entorno, [in:] Sunyer Lachiondo C. (ed.), Eco-emprendedores: Retos para la puesta en valor de los espacios protegidos, TERRA centro para la política ambiental, Madrid, pp. 23–30.
4. Copus A., Spikeman K., 2003, The AsPIRE Conceptual Framework, Final Report of AsPIRE Project, pp. 13–49 (unpublished).
5. Florido Trujillo G., Lozano Valencia P. J., 2005, Las figuras de protección de los espacios naturales en las comunidades autónomas espa-olas: una puesta al día, Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Espa-oles, 40, pp. 57–81.
6. Garayo Urruela J. M., 2001, Los espacios naturales protegidos: entre la conservación y el desarrollo, Lurralde, 24, pp. 271–293.
7. Gomez-Pompa A., Kaus A., 1992, Taming the Wilderness Myth, Bioscience, 42 (4), pp. 271–279.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1311675 -
8. FAO, 2005, Participatory and Negotiated Territorial Development (PNTD), Natural Resources Management and Environment Department.
9. Harvey D., 1989, The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry Into the Origins of Cultural Change, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Blackwell.
10. Katz C., 1998, Whose nature, whose culture? Private productions of space and the preservation of nature, [in:] Braun B., Castree N. (eds.), Remaking Reality: Nature at the End of the Millenium, London, Routledge, pp. 46–63.
11. Lee J., Árnason A., Nightingale A., Schucksmith M., 2005, Networking: Social Capital and Identities in European Rural Development, Sociologia Ruralis, 45 (4), pp. 269–283.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00305.x -
12. Magnani N., Struffi L., 2009, Translation sociology and social capital in rural development initiatives. A case study from the Italian Alps, Journal of Rural Studies, 25, pp. 231–238.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.10.004 -
13. Martínez Vega J., Calcerrada R., 2003, Repercusión de los espacios naturales protegidos en la economía rural espa-ola, Serie Geográfica, 11, pp. 41–60.
14. McCleave J., Espiner S., Booth K., 2006, The New Zealand people-park relationship: An explanatory model, Society and Natural Resources, 19 (6), pp. 547–561.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920600664001 -
15. Mulero Mendigorri A., 2002, La protección de espacios naturales en Espa-a: antecedentes, contrastes territoriales, conflictos y perspectivas, Madrid, Mundi-Prensa.
16. Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S., 1998, Social capital, intellectual capital and organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), pp. 242–266.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.533225 -
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259373 -
17. Osti G., 2000, LEADER and partnerships: the case of Italy, Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (2), pp. 172–180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00139 -
18. Picon B., 1989, Les espaces naturels sont-ils des supports de differentiation sociale?, [in:] Fourneau F. (ed.), Supervivencia de los espacios naturales, MAPA-Casa de Velázquez, Madrid, pp. 109–117.
19. Pimbert M. P., Pretty J., 1995, Parks, People and Professionals: Putting 'Participation' into Protected Area Management, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, International Institute for Environment and Development, World Wide Fund for Nature, Discussion Paper, 57, Geneva.
20. Pretty J. N., 1994, Alternative Systems of Inquiry for Sustainable Agriculture, IDS Bulletin, 25 (2), IDS, University of Sussex, pp. 37–48.
21. Pretty J., Smith D., 2004, Social Capital in Biodiversity Conservation and Management, Conservation Biology, 18 (3), pp. 631–638.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00126.x -
22. Ruschkowski E. Von, Mayer M., 2011, From Conflict to Partnership? Interactions between Protected Areas, Local Communities and Operators of Tourism Enterprises in Two German National Park Regions, Journal of Tourism and Leisure Studies, 17 (2), pp. 147–181.
23. Selby, A., Petäjistö, L., 2009, Uneven entrepreneurial responses to demands for tourism-related services adjacent to three national parks in southern Finland (Working papers of the Finnish forest research institute 127), Vantaa, Retrieved December 19, 2009, from http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2009/mwp127.htm
24. Shortall S., 2008, Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: Exploring the differences, Journal of Rural Studies, 24, pp. 450–457.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001 -
25. Smith N., 1990, Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space, Oxford, United Kingdom, Basil Blackwell.
26. Smith N., 1996, The production of nature, [in:] Robertson G., Marsh M., Tickneret L., Bird J., Curtis B., Putnam T. (eds.), Future/Natural: Nature, Science, Culture, Routledge, London, pp. 35–54.
27. Stern M. J., 2006, Understanding local reactions to national parks: the nature and consequences of local interpretations of park policies, management, and outreach, PhD thesis, Yale University, New Haven.
28. Stern M. J., 2008, The power of Trust: Toward a Theory of Local Opposition to Neighboring Protected Areas, Society & Natural Resources, 21 (10), pp. 859–875.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920801973763 -
29. Stern M. J., 2008, Coercion, voluntary compliance and protest: The role of trust and legitimacy in combating local opposition to protected areas, Environmental Conservation, 35 (3), pp. 200–210.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S037689290800502X -
30. Stoll-Kleemann S., Job H., 2008, The relevance of effective protected areas for biodiversity conservation: An introduction, GAIA, 17 (S1), pp. 86–90.
31. Tsai W., Ghoshal S., 1998, Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks, Academy of Management Review, 41 (4), pp. 464–476.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/257085 -
32. West P., Igoe J., Brockington D., 2006, Parks and Peoples: The Social Impact of Protected Areas, Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, pp. 251–277.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308 -


Studia Obszarów Wiejskich



Start page:


End page:


Detailed Resource Type:



File size 1,6 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:56654 ; 1642-4689 ; 10.7163/SOW.38.4


CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call no. Cz.4488 ; CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call no. Cz.4489 ; click here to follow the link




Creative Commons Attribution BY 3.0 PL license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 3.0 PL] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 3.0 PL license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure



Object collections:

Last modified:

Mar 25, 2021

In our library since:

Oct 14, 2015

Number of object content downloads / hits:


All available object's versions:


Show description in RDF format:


Show description in RDFa format:


Show description in OAI-PMH format:




Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information