Object

Title: Central and Eastern European Actors in the European Spatial Planning Debate. Time to Make a Difference?

Creator:

Cotella, Giancarlo

Date issued/created:

2012

Resource Type:

Article

Subtitle:

Europa XXI 22 (2012)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

s. 11-64

References:

1. Adams N., Cotella G., Nunes R. (Eds.), 2011, Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning:Knowledge an policy development in an enlarged EU. London: Routledge. ; 2. Adams N., Cotella G., Nunes R., 2012 (forthcoming), The engagement of territorial knowledgecommunities with European spatial planning and the territorial cohesion debate: a Baltic Perspective,European Planning Studies. ; 3. Bachtler J. (Ed.), 1992, Socio economic situation and development of the regions in the neighbouringcountries of the Community in Central and Eastern Europe. Report to the European Commission.Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. ; 4. Böhme K., 2002, Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning, Stockholm: Nordregio. ; 5. Böhme K., Doucet P., Komornicki T., Zaucha J., Świątek D., 2011, How to strengthen the territorialdimension of ‘Europe 2020’ and EU Cohesion Policy. Report based on the Territorial Agenda2020, prepared at the request of the Polish EU Presidency. ; 6. Böhme K., Waterhout B., 2008, The Europeanization of Spatial Planning, in A. Faludi (Ed.) EuropeanSpatial Research and Planning. Cambridge MA: Lincoln Institute: 225-248. ; 7. Brunet R., 1989, Les Villes ‘Européennes’. Rapport pour la DATAR. Paris: RECLUS/DATAR. ; 8. Bruno I., Jacquot S., Mandin S., 2006, Europeanization through its instrumentation: benchmarking,mainstreaming and the open method of co-ordination ...toolbox or Pandora’s box?, Journal ofEuropean public policy, 13 (4): 519-536. ; - ; 9. CEC – Commission of the European Communities, 1991, Europe 2000: Outlook for the developmentof the Community’s territory. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the EuropeanCommunities. ; 10. CEC, 1994, Europe 2000+: Cooperation for European Territorial Development. Luxembourg: Officefor Official Publications of the European Communities. ; 11. CEC, 1996, The Impact of the development of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe on the Communityterritory. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. ; 12. CEC, 1999, European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) Towards Balanced and SustainableDevelopment of the Territory of the EU. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of theEuropean Communities. ; 13. CEC, 2005, Cohesion Policy in Support of Growth and Jobs: Community Strategic Guidelines,2007-2013. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. ; 14. CEC, 2007, Growing Regions, Growing Europe - Fourth Report on Economic and Social Cohesion.Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. ; 15. CEC, 2008, Green paper on territorial cohesion - Turning territorial diversity into strength. Brussels:Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. ; 16. Cotella G., 2009, Governance territoriale comunitaria e sistemi di pianificazione: Riflessionisull’allargamento ad est dell’Unione europea, PhD dissertation, Inter-university department ofterritorial studies and planning, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy. ; 17. Cotella G., Adams N., Nunes R.J., 2012, Engaging in European Spatial Planning: A Central andEastern European Perspective on the Territorial Cohesion Debate, European Planning Studies ; - ; 18. Cotella G., Janin Rivolin U., 2010, Institutions, discourse and practices: towards a multi-dimensionalunderstanding of EU territorial governance, paper presented at the XXIV AESOP CongressSpace is Luxury, Helsinki, 7–10 July. ; 19. Cotella G., Pallagst K.M., 2012, Engaging With The European Spatial Planning Debate. The DifferentialMerger Of Central And Eastern European Actors, paper presented at the 25th Congressof the Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP), Ankara (Turkey), 11-14 July. ; 20. Dabinett G., Richardson T., 2005, The Europeanisation of spatial strategy: Shaping regions andspatial justice through governmental ideas, International Planning Studies 10 (3-4): 201-218. ; - ; 21. Dąbrowski M., 2011, Institutional Change, Partnership and Regional Networks: Civic Engagementand the Implementation of the Structural Funds in Poland, in N. Adams, G. Cotella and R. Nunes(Eds.) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Developmentin an Enlarged EU, London: Routledge, 205-228. ; 22. Davoudi S., 2006, Evidence-Based Planning: Rhetoric and Reality, disP, 165(2): 14-24. ; 23. DE Presidency, 2007a, Territorial Agenda of the European Union: Towards a More Competitiveand Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions, Agreed on the occasion of the Informal MinisterialMeeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion on 24 / 25 May 2007 (http://www.bmvbs.de/Anlage/ original_1005295/Territorial-Agenda-of-the-European-Union-Agreed-on-25-May-2007-accessible.pdf. Last accessed 25 September 2010). ; 24. DE Presidency, 2007b, Territorial State and Perspective of the European Union: Toward a StrongerEuropean Territorial Cohesion in the Light of the Lisbon and Gothenburg Ambitions, A BackgroundDocument for the Territorial Agenda of the European Union, Based on the ScopingDocument discussed by Ministers at their Informal Ministerial Meeting in Luxembourg in May2005, http://www.eu-territorial-agenda.eu/Reference%20Documents/The-Territorial-State-and-Perspectives-of-the-European-Union.pdf ; 25. Dühr S., Colomb C., Nadin V., 2010, European Spatial Planning and Territorial Co-operation.London: Routledge. ; 26. Dühr S., Stead D., Zonneveld W. (Eds.), 2007, The Europeanization of Spatial Planning ThroughTerritorial Cooperation, Planning Practice & Research, 22 (3): 291-471. ; - ; 27. ESPON – European Spatial Planning Observation Network, 2006, Territory matters for competitivenessand cohesion, Luxembourg: ESPON. ; 28. ESPON – European Spatial Planning Observation Network, 2007a, ESPON Project 2.3.2. Governanceof territorial and urban policies from EU to local level, Final report, http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/PolicyImpactProjects/ESDPImpact/fr-2.3.1-full_rev_Jan2007.pdf ; 29. ESPON – European Spatial Planning Observation Network, 2007b, ESPON Project 2.3.1. Applicationand effects of the ESDP in the Member States, Final report, http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/PolicyImpactProjects/ESDPImpact/fr-2.3.1-full_rev_Jan2007.pdf ; 30. Evers D., 2007, Reflections on territorial cohesion and European spatial planning, Tijdschrift vorEconomische en Sociale Geografie, 99(3): 303-315. ; 31. Evers D., Tennekes J., Borsboom J., Heiligenberg H. van den, Thissen M., 2009, A Territorial ImpactAssessment of Territorial Cohesion for the Netherlands. Den Hag: Netherlands EnvironmentalAssessment Agency. ; 32. Faludi A., 2001, The Application of the European Spatial Development Perspective: Evidence fromthe North-West Metropolitan Area, European Planning Studies, 9(5): 663-675. ; - ; 33. Faludi A., 2008, The learning machine: European integration in the planning mirror, Environmentand Planning A, 40(6): 1470-1484. ; 34. Faludi A., 2009, A Turning Point in the Development of European Spatial Planning? The TerritorialAgenda of the European Union and the First Action Programme, Progress in Planning, 71(1):1-42. ; - ; 35. Faludi A., 2011, Cohesion, Coherence, Cooperation: European spatial planning coming of age?London: Routledge. ; 36. Faludi A., Waterhout B., 2002, The making of the European Development Perspective - No masterplan.London: Routledge. ; 37. Faludi A., Waterhout B., 2006, Introducing Evidence-based Planning, disP, 165(2): 4-13. ; 38. Finka M., 2011, Evolving Frameworks for Regional Development and Spatial Planning in the NewRegions of the EU, in N. Adams, G. Cotella and R. Nunes (Eds.) Territorial Development, Cohesionand Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, London:Routledge, 103-122. ; 39. Giannakourou G., 1998, The Europeanisation of national spatial planning policies, in C. Bengs andK. Böhme (Eds) The Progress of European Spatial Planning (Stockholm, Nordregio): 25-34. ; 40. Giannakourou G., 2005, Transforming Spatial Planning Policy in Mediterranean Countries: Europeanizationand Domestic Change, European Planning Studies, 13 (2): 319-331. ; - ; 41. Gorzelak G., 1996, The Regional Dimension of Transformation in Central Europe, London/Bristol:Regional Studies Association. ; 42. Hall P., Taylor R., 1996, Political science and the three new institutionalisms, Political Studies, 44:936–957. ; - ; 43. Hix S., 2005, The political system of the European Union, London, Palgrave MacMillan. ; 44. HU PRESIDENCY, 2011, Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 - Towards an Inclusive,Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions, Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meetingof Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19 May, Gödöllő,Hungary, http://www.eu2011.hu/files/bveu/documents/TA2020.pdf ; 45. Janin Rivolin U., Faludi A., 2005, The Hidden Face of European Spatial Planning: Innovations inGovernance, European Planning Studies, 13(2): 195-215. ; [CrossRef] ; 46. Kingdon J.W., 1995, Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins. ; 47. Kule L., Krisjane L., Berzins M., 2011, The rhetoric and reality of pursuing territorial cohesionin Latvia, in N. Adams, G. Cotella, R. Nunes (Eds.) Territorial Development, Cohesion andSpatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, London: Routledge,291-319. ; 48. Lave J., Wenger E., 1991, Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press. ; - ; 49. Lenschow A., 2006, Europeanization of public policy, in J. Richardson (Ed.) European Union – Powerand policy making, Abingdon: Routledge: 55-71. ; 50. Lowndes V., 1996, Varieties of new institutionalism: A critical appraisal, Public Administration,74(2): 181-197. ; - ; 51. Maier K., 2011, The pursuit of balanced territorial development: The realities and complexities ofthe cohesion agenda, in N. Adams, G. Cotella, R. Nunes (Eds.) Territorial Development, Cohesionand Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, London:Routledge, 266-290. ; 52. Nugent N., 2006, The Government and Politics of the European Union, Basingstoke and Durham NC:Palgrave and Duke University Press. ; 53. Nunes R., Adams N., Cotella G., 2009, Policy ‘ framing’ and evidence-based planning: ‘epistemiccommunities’ in the multi-jurisdictional environment of an enlarged Europe, paper presentedat the 23rd AESOP Congress (http://www.regional-studies-assoc.ac.uk/events/2009/apr-leuvenpapers.asp. Last accessed 25 September 2010). ; 54. Olsen J.P., 2002, The many faces of Europeanization, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (5),921-952. ; - ; 55. Pallagst K.M., 2006, European spatial planning reloaded: considering EU enlargement in theoryand practice, European Planning Studies, 2/2006: 253-272. ; - ; 56. PL PRESIDENCY, 2011, Issue Paper. Territoril dimension of EU policies. Strategic programming,coordination and institutions territorially-sensitive for an efficient delivery of the new growthagenda. ‘Who does what and where?’. Warsaw. (http://www.mrr.gov.pl/rozwoj_regionalny/Prezydencja/Kalendarz/Documents/Issue_Paper_Territorial_dimension_of_EU_policies.pdf.Last accessed 18 January 2011). ; 57. PT PRESIDENCY, 2007, First action programme for the implementation of the territorial agendaof the European Union (http://www.dgotdu.pt/rimotr/UE-doc/AP1_23NovembroVfinal.pdf. Lastaccessed 25 September 2010). ; 58. Radaelli C.M., 2004, Europeanization: solution or problem?, European Integration Online Papers,8 (16), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-016.htm ; 59. Richardson J., 2001, Policy-making in the EU: Interests, ideas and garbage cans of primeval soup, inRichardson, J. (ed.) European Union Power and Policy-making, 2nd edition, London/New York:Routledge: 3-26. ; 60. Salgado S.R., Woll C., 2004, L’europeanisation et les acteurs non-etatiques, paper presented tothe conference Europeanization of public policies and European integration, IEP-Paris,13 February. ; 61. Schimmelfenning F., Sedelmeier U. (Eds.), 2005, The Europeanization of central and eastern Europe,Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. ; 62. Stead D., Cotella G., 2011, Differential Europe, disP [special issue], 186(3). ; 63. Steinmo S., Thelen K., Longstreth F., 1992, Structuring Politics: Historical institu tionalism in comparativeanalysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ; - ; 64. Waterhout B., 2008, The institutionalisation of European spatial planning, Amsterdam: IOS Press. ; 65. Waterhout B., 2011, European spatial planning: current state and future challenges, in N. Adams,G. Cotella, R. Nunes (Eds.) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledgeand Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, London: Routledge, 69-83. ; 66. Williams R.H., 1996, European Union spatial policy and planning. London: Chapman. ; 67. Wishlade F., Yuill D., Mendez C., 2003, Regional Policy in the EU: A Passing Phase of Europeanisationor a Complex Case of Policy Transfer?, Regional and Industrial Policy Research Paper 50,Glasgow: European Policies Research Centre - University of Strathclyde. http://www.eprc.strath.ac.uk/eprc/Documents/PDF_files/RIPR%2050%20ESRC.pdf

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

22

Start page:

21

End page:

36

Format:

File size 0,9 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:31082 ; 1429-7132 ; 10.7163/Eu21.2012.22.2

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Objects

Similar
×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information