Object

Title: Editorial: EU cohesion policy and domestic territorial governance. What chances for cross-fertilization?

Subtitle:

Europa XXI 35 (2018)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

29 cm ; Każdy numer posiada własny tytuł.

Abstract:

Territorial governance is an extremely heterogeneous activity. Each European country is characterised by a complex system of legal acts, tools, discourses and practices that had consolidated through time, as a consequence of peculiar path-dependent processes. At the same time, since more than 30 years the European Union is developing territorially relevant actions and interventions, ultimately aiming at achieving the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the continent. The mutual relations entangling domestic and supranational territorial governance remain unclear: on the one hand, the European Union is required to produce a framework for delivering its policies that is flexible enough to accommodate domestic differences; on the other hand, domestic territorial governance and spatial planning systems should adapt in order to allow room for cross-fertilization with supranational interventions. This contribution builds on the evidence collected by the research project ESPON COMPASS to frame and explore this issue. In doing so, it serves as an introduction for this special issue that, in the following contributions, presents a number of concrete examples of interaction between EU spatial policies and domestic territorial governance and spatial planning.

References:

Adams N., Cotella G., Nunes R. (eds.), 2012. Territorial development, cohesion and spatial planning: Building on EU enlargement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842973 ; Balchin P., Sykora L., Bull G., 2002. Regional policy and planning in Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203198674 ; Barca F., 2009. An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy-Independent Report. European Commission, Brussels. ; Böhme K., 2002. Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning. Stockholm: Nordregio. ; Böhme K., Waterhout B., 2008. The Europeanization of planning. [in:] A. Faludi (ed.) European spatial research and planning. Lincold Institute of Land Policy, pp. 225-248. ; Börzel T., Risse T., 2000. When Europe hits home: Europeanization and domestic change. European Integration Online Papers, vol. 4, no. 15. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302768 ; Bruno I., Jacquot S., Mandin S., 2006. Europeanization through its instrumentation: benchmarking, mainstreaming and the open method of co-ordination … toolbox or Pandora's box? Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 519-536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600693895 ; CEC - Commission of the European Communities, 1997. The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies. Regional Development Studies, 28. Luxembourg: European Communities. ; CEC - Commission of the European Communities, 1999. ESDP - European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU. Approved by the Ministers responsible for Regional/Spatial Planning of the European Union. Luxembourg: European Communities. ; Colomb C., Santinha G., 2014. European Union competition policy and the European territorial cohesion agenda: An impossible reconciliation? State aid rules and public service liberalization through the European spatial planning lens. European Planning Studies, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 459-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.744384 ; Cotella G., Janin Rivolin U., 2015. Europeanizazione del governo del territorio: un modello analítico. Territorio, vol. 73, pp. 127-134. https://doi.org/10.3280/TR2015-073019 ; Cotella G., 2019. The Urban Dimension of EU Cohesion Policy. [in:] Territorial Cohesion. Springer, pp. 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03386-6_7 ; Cotella G., Crivello S., 2016. The Macroregional Geopolitics of Energy Security: Towards a New Energy World Order? [in:] M. Gruning, P. Lombardi. Low-carbon Energy Security from a European Perspective. Elsevier Academic Press, pp. 81-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802970-1.00004-8 ; Cotella G., Crivello S., Karatayev M., 2016. European Union energy policy evolutionary patterns. [in:] M. Gruning, P. Lombardi. Low-carbon Energy Security from a European Perspective. Elsevier Academic Press, pp.13-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802970-1.00002-4 ; Cotella G., Janin Rivolin U., 2011. Europeanization of spatial planning through discourse and practice in Italy. disP-The Planning Review, vol. 47, no. 186, pp. 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557143 ; Cotella G., Janin Rivolin U., Santangelo M., 2016. Transferring 'good' territorial governance across Europe: opportunities and barriers. [in:] L. Van Well, P. Schmitt (eds.) Territorial Governance across Europe. Pathways, practices and prospects. London and New York, Routledge, pp. 238-253. ; Davies H., Edwards D., Hooper A., Punter J., 1989. Planning Control in Western Europe. HMSO, London. ; DE Presidency of the European Union, 2007. Territorial Agenda of the European Union: Towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. ; Doria L., Fedeli V., Tedesco C. (eds.), 2006. Rethinking European spatial policy as a Hologram. Actions, institutions, discourses. Aldershot: Ashgate. ; Dühr S., Colomb C., Nadin V., 2010. European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203895290 ; Dühr S., Stead D., Zonneveld W. (eds.), 2007. The Europeanization of Spatial Planning Through Territorial Cooperation. Planning Practice & Research, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 291-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701688245 ; ESPON - European Spatial Planning Observation Network, 2007. ESPON Project 2.3.2. Governance of territorial and urban policies from EU to local level, Final report. ESPON EGTC. ; ESPON & TU Delft, 2018. ESPON COMPASS - Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Systems in Europe. Final Report. ESPON EGTC. ; EU - European Council of the European Union, 2014. Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. Official Journal of the European Union, L257, pp. 135-145. ; Faludi A., 2001. European spatial planning: a contested field. Built Environment, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 245-252. ; Faludi A., 2018. The Poverty of Territorialism. A Neo-Medieval View of European Spatial Planning. Edgar Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788973618 ; Faludi A., Waterhout B., 2002. The making of the European spatial development perspective. No masterplan. London and New York: Routledge. ; Featherstone K., Radaelli C. M. (eds.), 2003. The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252092.001.0001 ; Gänzle S., Kern K. (eds.), 2015. A ,macro-regional' Europe in the Making: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50972-7 ; Hans S., Böhme K., 2018. Planning in Luxembourg: innovation and tradition under one umbrella? Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 57-68. ; Healey P., Williams, R., 1993. European urban planning systems: Diversity and convergence. Urban Studies, vol. 30, no. 4-5, pp. 701-720. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989320081881 ; HU Presidency of the European Union, 2011. Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 - Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. ; Janin Rivolin U., 2008. Conforming and performing planning systems in Europe: An unbearable cohabitation. Planning, Practice & Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450802327081 ; Janin Rivolin U., 2010. EU territorial governance: learning from institutional progress. European Journal of Spatial Development, vol. 38, pp. 1-28. ; Janin Rivolin U., 2012. Planning systems as institutional technologies: a proposed conceptualization and the implications for comparison. Planning Practice and Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661181 ; Jensen O. B., Richardson T., 2001. Nested visions: new rationalities of space in European spatial planning. Regional Studies, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 703-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400120084696 ; Knill C., Lehmkuhl D., 1999. How Europe Matters. Different Mechanisms of Europeanization. European Integration Online Papers, vol. 7, no. 3, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-007.htm [12 December 2018]. ; Komornicki T., Szejgiec-Kolenda B., Degórska B., Goch K., Śleszyński P., Bednarek-Szczepańska M., Siłka P., 2018. Spatial planning determinants of cohesion policy implementation in Polish regions. Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 69-88. ; Larsson G., 2006. Spatial Planning Systems in Western Europe: An Overview. Amsterdam: IOS Press. ; Lenschow A., 2006. Europeanization of public policy. [in:] J. Richardson (ed.) European Union - Power and policy making. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 55-71. ; March J. G., Olsen J. P., 1998. The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 943-969. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550699 ; Nadin V. (ed.), 2012. International Comparative Planning Methodology. Planning Practice & Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.669928 ; Nadin V., Stead D., 2008. European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. disP, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001 ; Newman P., Thornley A., 1996. Urban planning in Europe. London: Routledge. ; Nugent N., 2006. The Government and Politics of the European Union. Basingstoke and Durham NC: Palgrave and Duke University Press. ; Olsen J. P., 2002. The many faces of Europeanization, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 921-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00403 ; Othengrafen F., 2010. Spatial planning as expression of culturised planning practices: The examples of Helsinki, Finland and Athens, Greece. Town Planning Review, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 83-110. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2009.25 ; Pámer Z., 2018. How governance counts? Comparative analysis of activity and funding patterns of Central European cross-border cooperation programmes. Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 111-126. ; Perger É., 2018. Planning and development activities in functional regions - the Hungarian case. Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 37-56. ; Prezioso M., 2007. Why ESPON Programme is felled as full of policy implications more than scientific suggestions. European Journal of Spatial Development, vol. 4, pp. 1-8. ; Purkarthofer E., 2018. Understanding Europeanization from Within. The interpretation, implementation and instrumentalization of European spatial planning in Austria and Finland. Doctoral Dissertations. Aalto University. ; Radaelli C. M., 2004. Europeanization: solution or problem? European Integration Online Papers, vol. 8, no. 16, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-016.htm [12 December 2018]. ; Sassen S., 2006. Migration, citizenship, ethnos. Palgrave Macmillan. ; Schimmelfenning F., Sedelmeier U. (eds.), 2005. The Europeanization of central and eastern Europe. Cornell University Press. ; Servillo L., 2010. Territorial Cohesion Discourses: Hegemonic Strategic Concepts in European Spatial Planning. Planning Theory and Practice, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 397-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2010.500135 ; Servillo L., De Bruijn M., 2018. From LEADER to CLLD: The adoption of the new fund opportunities and of their local development options. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, vol. 3, 223-233. ; Smas L., Lidmo J., 2018. Organising regions: spatial planning and territorial governance practices in two Swedish regions. Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 21-36. ; Stead D., Cotella G., 2011. Differential Europe. disP, vol. 186, no. 3, pp. 12-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557139 ; Stead D., Cotella G., 2011. Spatial planning and the influence of domestic actors. Some conclusions. disP, vol. 186, no. 3, pp. 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557146 ; Swyngedouw E., 2000. Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling. Environment and planning D: Society and space, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9s ; Valkenburg G., Cotella G., 2016. Governance of energy transitions: about inclusion and closure in complex sociotechnical problems. Energy, Sustainability and Society, vol. 6, no. 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-016-0086-8 ; Vedung E., Rist R. C., Bemelmans-Videc M. L. (eds.), 1998. Carrots, sticks & sermons: policy instruments and their evaluation. Transaction Publishers. ; Walsh C., Kannen A., 2019. Planning at Sea: Shifting Planning Practices at the German North Sea Coast. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, Spatial Research and Planning, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2478/rara-2019-0020 ; Waterhout B., 2008. The institutionalisation of European spatial planning. vol. 18, IOS Press. ; Williams B., Varghese J., 2018. Examining the impact of EU cohesion policies aiming to reduce regional and social disparities with examples of policy impacts in Ireland. Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 89-110. ; Williams M. D., Williams R. H., 1996. European Union spatial policy and planning. SAGE. ; Wishlade F., Yuill D., Mkendez C., 2003. Regional policy in the EU: a passing phase of Europeanisation or a complex case of policy transfer? University of Strathclyde, European Policies Research Centre. ; Zaucha J., 2018. Book Review: The Poverty of Territorialism. A Neo-Medieval View of European Spatial Planning. Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 127-132.

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

35

Start page:

5

End page:

20

Format:

Rozmiar pliku 0,6 MB ; application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:72529 ; 1429-7132 (print) ; 2300-8547 (online) ; 10.7163/Eu21.2018.35.1

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0

Terms of use:

Zasób wyłączony spod ochrony prawa autorskiego. Korzystanie dozwolone bez ograniczeń wynikających z autorskich praw majątkowych. ; -

Digitizing institution:

Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Original in:

Centralna Biblioteka Geografii i Ochrony Środowiska Instytutu Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN

Projects co-financed by:

Program Operacyjny Polska Cyfrowa, lata 2014-2020, Działanie 2.3 : Cyfrowa dostępność i użyteczność sektora publicznego; środki z Europejskiego Funduszu Rozwoju Regionalnego oraz współfinansowania krajowego z budżetu państwa

Objects

Similar
×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information