Subtitle:

Europa XXI 27 (2014)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

29 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Abstract:

Subsidies of the EU funds resulted in major projects and plans. In order to prevent natural disasters, the European Community – among others – introduced the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). Withthe SEA the environmental aspects prevailed in an earlier phase of the planning process. The SEA is mostly new means in the new Member States, hence the planners and stakeholders had to learn to incorporate it into theirpractice. On the other hand, the existing institutional structure of a country influences the planning decision making processes. This paper examines the introduction of and difficulties associated with the SEA in Hungarywhile focusing on institutional settings and integration elements.

References:

1. Atkinson, R., Klausen, J. E., 2011. Understanding sustainability policy: governance, knowledge and the search for integration. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 231-251.
-
2. Coenen F., Denters, B., Klok, P.J. & Kotzebue, J., 2008. G-fors Dutch national report Working Paper (University of Twente), http://www.hannover.de/europa/data/download/Projekte/GFORS/Netherland.pdf [14 August 2013].
3. Czira T., Jusztin V. & Sovago K., 2004. A társadalmi-gazdasági és környezeti hatásértékelés szerepe a területi tervezésben. Területi statisztika, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 3–20.
4. Dąbrowski, M., 2008. Structural funds as a driver for institutional change in Poland. Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 227-248.
-
5. Degórski, M., 2010: Socio-economic responsesto the environment and ecosystem servicesin regional development. Geographia Polonica, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 83-95.
-
6. Florjańczyk, Z., Janc, K., Czapiewski, K. Ł., 2012. The importance and diffusion of knowledge in the agricultural sector: the Polish experiences. Geographia Polonica, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 45-56.
-
7. Feldmann, L. & Vanderhaegen, M., 2001. The EU1s SEA directive: status and links to integration and sustainable development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 203-222.
-
8. Heinelt, H., Held G., Kopp-Malek, T., Matthiesen, U. Reisinger, E. & Zimmermann, K., 2006. Governance for Sustainability. Conceptual Framework for the G-FORS project. Working Paper (unpubl.)[typescript].
9. Lafferty, W.M. & Hovden, E., 2003. Environmental policy integration: Towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics, vol. 12, no. 3, Autumn, pp. 1-22.
-
10. Lafferty, W.M., 2004. From environmental protection to sustainable development: the challenge of decoupling through sectoral integration. [in:] Lafferty, W.M (ed) Governance for Sustainable Development. The Challenge of Adapting Form to Function, Cheltenhan, Edward Elgar, pp. 191–220.
11. Lenschow, A., 1997. Variation in EC environmental policy integration: agency push within complex institutional structures. Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 109–127.
-
12. Lenschow, A., 1999. The greening of the EU: The Common Agriculture Policy and Structural Funds. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol. 17, no. pp. 91–108.
13. Matthiesen, U., 2005. KnowledgeScapes. Pleading for a knowledge turn in a socio-spatial research. Working Paper (Erkner, IRS) http://www.irs-net.de/download/KnowledgeScapes.pdf [14 August 2013]
14. Ostrom, E., 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press.
15. Pálné Kovács I., Paraskevopoulos, C. J. & Horvath Gy., 2004. Institutional "legacies" and the shaping of regional governance in Hungary. Regional & Federal Studies. vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 430-460.
-
16. Pálné Kovács I. & Varjú V. (eds.) 2008. G-FORS Case Studies on SEA and ETS in Hungary (Pécs, CRS of HAS) Wroking Paper, http://www.hannover.de/europa/data/download/Projekte/GFORS/Hungarian.pdf, [14 August 2013].
17. Partidário, M. & Voogd, H. 2004. An Endeavour at Integration in Environmental Analysis and Planning. [in:] Miller, M. & De Roo, G. (eds.) Integrating City Planning and Environmental Improvement. Practicable Strategies for Sustainable Urban Development (Aldershot, Ashgate) pp. 285–294.
18. Péti M., 2012. A territorial understanding of sustainability in public development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 61-73.
-
19. Sadler, B., 1996. Environmental assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improve performance. Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa.
20. Szilvácsku Zs., 2003. Stratégiai környezeti vizsgálatok gyakorlata az Európai Unióban. Budapest, Vitaregnat Bt.
21. Theophilou, V., Bond, A., Cashmore, M., 2010. Application of the SEA Directive to EU structural funds: Perspectives on effectiveness Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 136-144.
-
22. Therivel, R., 2004. Strategic Environmental Assessment in Action. London, Eartscan
23. Therivel, R., Christian, G., Craig, C., Grinham, R. & Mackins, D., Smith, J., Sneller, T., Turner, R., Dee, W. & Yamane, M., 2009. Sustainability-focused impact assessment: English experiences. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 27, no. 2, June, pp. 155-168.
-
24. Varjú V., 2008. Environmental Respects of Regional Planning: Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in Hungary. [in:] Wawge, R.S. (ed): Strategic Environmental Assessment. Perspectives, applications and practices. The Icfai University Press, Hyderabad, India. pp. 47-58.
25. Wackernagel, M. & Rees, W., 1996. Our ecological footprint. Reducing human impact on the Earth. Canada, New Society Publishers.
26. Wood, C., (ed.) 2005. Strategic Environmental Assessment and Land Use Planning: An International Evaluation. London, Earthscan Publications.

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

27

Start page:

33

End page:

46

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

File size 1 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:53617 ; 1429-7132 ; 10.7163/Eu21.2014.27.3

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Access:

Open