Object

Title: Editorial: EU cohesion policy and domestic territorial governance. What chances for cross-fertilization?

Subtitle:

Europa XXI 35 (2018)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

29 cm

Abstract:

Territorial governance is an extremely heterogeneous activity. Each European country is characterised by a complex system of legal acts, tools, discourses and practices that had consolidated through time, as a consequence of peculiar path-dependent processes. At the same time, since more than 30 years the European Union is developing territorially relevant actions and interventions, ultimately aiming at achieving the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the continent. The mutual relations entangling domestic and supranational territorial governance remain unclear: on the one hand, the European Union is required to produce a framework for delivering its policies that is flexible enough to accommodate domestic differences; on the other hand, domestic territorial governance and spatial planning systems should adapt in order to allow room for cross-fertilization with supranational interventions. This contribution builds on the evidence collected by the research project ESPON COMPASS to frame and explore this issue. In doing so, it serves as an introduction for this special issue that, in the following contributions, presents a number of concrete examples of interaction between EU spatial policies and domestic territorial governance and spatial planning.

References:

Adams N., Cotella G., Nunes R. (eds.), 2012. Territorial development, cohesion and spatial planning: Building on EU enlargement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842973
Balchin P., Sykora L., Bull G., 2002. Regional policy and planning in Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203198674
Barca F., 2009. An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy-Independent Report. European Commission, Brussels.
Böhme K., 2002. Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning. Stockholm: Nordregio.
Böhme K., Waterhout B., 2008. The Europeanization of planning. [in:] A. Faludi (ed.) European spatial research and planning. Lincold Institute of Land Policy, pp. 225-248.
Börzel T., Risse T., 2000. When Europe hits home: Europeanization and domestic change. European Integration Online Papers, vol. 4, no. 15. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302768
Bruno I., Jacquot S., Mandin S., 2006. Europeanization through its instrumentation: benchmarking, mainstreaming and the open method of co-ordination … toolbox or Pandora's box? Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 519-536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600693895
CEC - Commission of the European Communities, 1997. The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies. Regional Development Studies, 28. Luxembourg: European Communities.
CEC - Commission of the European Communities, 1999. ESDP - European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU. Approved by the Ministers responsible for Regional/Spatial Planning of the European Union. Luxembourg: European Communities.
Colomb C., Santinha G., 2014. European Union competition policy and the European territorial cohesion agenda: An impossible reconciliation? State aid rules and public service liberalization through the European spatial planning lens. European Planning Studies, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 459-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.744384
Cotella G., Janin Rivolin U., 2015. Europeanizazione del governo del territorio: un modello analítico. Territorio, vol. 73, pp. 127-134. https://doi.org/10.3280/TR2015-073019
Cotella G., 2019. The Urban Dimension of EU Cohesion Policy. [in:] Territorial Cohesion. Springer, pp. 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03386-6_7
Cotella G., Crivello S., 2016. The Macroregional Geopolitics of Energy Security: Towards a New Energy World Order? [in:] M. Gruning, P. Lombardi. Low-carbon Energy Security from a European Perspective. Elsevier Academic Press, pp. 81-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802970-1.00004-8
Cotella G., Crivello S., Karatayev M., 2016. European Union energy policy evolutionary patterns. [in:] M. Gruning, P. Lombardi. Low-carbon Energy Security from a European Perspective. Elsevier Academic Press, pp.13-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802970-1.00002-4
Cotella G., Janin Rivolin U., 2011. Europeanization of spatial planning through discourse and practice in Italy. disP-The Planning Review, vol. 47, no. 186, pp. 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557143
Cotella G., Janin Rivolin U., Santangelo M., 2016. Transferring 'good' territorial governance across Europe: opportunities and barriers. [in:] L. Van Well, P. Schmitt (eds.) Territorial Governance across Europe. Pathways, practices and prospects. London and New York, Routledge, pp. 238-253.
Davies H., Edwards D., Hooper A., Punter J., 1989. Planning Control in Western Europe. HMSO, London.
DE Presidency of the European Union, 2007. Territorial Agenda of the European Union: Towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions.
Doria L., Fedeli V., Tedesco C. (eds.), 2006. Rethinking European spatial policy as a Hologram. Actions, institutions, discourses. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Dühr S., Colomb C., Nadin V., 2010. European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation. London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203895290
Dühr S., Stead D., Zonneveld W. (eds.), 2007. The Europeanization of Spatial Planning Through Territorial Cooperation. Planning Practice & Research, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 291-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701688245
ESPON - European Spatial Planning Observation Network, 2007. ESPON Project 2.3.2. Governance of territorial and urban policies from EU to local level, Final report. ESPON EGTC.
ESPON & TU Delft, 2018. ESPON COMPASS - Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Systems in Europe. Final Report. ESPON EGTC.
EU - European Council of the European Union, 2014. Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. Official Journal of the European Union, L257, pp. 135-145.
Faludi A., 2001. European spatial planning: a contested field. Built Environment, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 245-252.
Faludi A., 2018. The Poverty of Territorialism. A Neo-Medieval View of European Spatial Planning. Edgar Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788973618
Faludi A., Waterhout B., 2002. The making of the European spatial development perspective. No masterplan. London and New York: Routledge.
Featherstone K., Radaelli C. M. (eds.), 2003. The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252092.001.0001
Gänzle S., Kern K. (eds.), 2015. A ,macro-regional' Europe in the Making: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-50972-7
Hans S., Böhme K., 2018. Planning in Luxembourg: innovation and tradition under one umbrella? Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 57-68.
Healey P., Williams, R., 1993. European urban planning systems: Diversity and convergence. Urban Studies, vol. 30, no. 4-5, pp. 701-720. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989320081881
HU Presidency of the European Union, 2011. Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 - Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions.
Janin Rivolin U., 2008. Conforming and performing planning systems in Europe: An unbearable cohabitation. Planning, Practice & Research, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450802327081
Janin Rivolin U., 2010. EU territorial governance: learning from institutional progress. European Journal of Spatial Development, vol. 38, pp. 1-28.
Janin Rivolin U., 2012. Planning systems as institutional technologies: a proposed conceptualization and the implications for comparison. Planning Practice and Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661181
Jensen O. B., Richardson T., 2001. Nested visions: new rationalities of space in European spatial planning. Regional Studies, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 703-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400120084696
Knill C., Lehmkuhl D., 1999. How Europe Matters. Different Mechanisms of Europeanization. European Integration Online Papers, vol. 7, no. 3, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-007.htm [12 December 2018].
Komornicki T., Szejgiec-Kolenda B., Degórska B., Goch K., Śleszyński P., Bednarek-Szczepańska M., Siłka P., 2018. Spatial planning determinants of cohesion policy implementation in Polish regions. Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 69-88.
Larsson G., 2006. Spatial Planning Systems in Western Europe: An Overview. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Lenschow A., 2006. Europeanization of public policy. [in:] J. Richardson (ed.) European Union - Power and policy making. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 55-71.
March J. G., Olsen J. P., 1998. The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 943-969. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550699
Nadin V. (ed.), 2012. International Comparative Planning Methodology. Planning Practice & Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.669928
Nadin V., Stead D., 2008. European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. disP, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
Newman P., Thornley A., 1996. Urban planning in Europe. London: Routledge.
Nugent N., 2006. The Government and Politics of the European Union. Basingstoke and Durham NC: Palgrave and Duke University Press.
Olsen J. P., 2002. The many faces of Europeanization, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 921-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00403
Othengrafen F., 2010. Spatial planning as expression of culturised planning practices: The examples of Helsinki, Finland and Athens, Greece. Town Planning Review, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 83-110. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2009.25
Pámer Z., 2018. How governance counts? Comparative analysis of activity and funding patterns of Central European cross-border cooperation programmes. Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 111-126.
Perger É., 2018. Planning and development activities in functional regions - the Hungarian case. Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 37-56.
Prezioso M., 2007. Why ESPON Programme is felled as full of policy implications more than scientific suggestions. European Journal of Spatial Development, vol. 4, pp. 1-8.
Purkarthofer E., 2018. Understanding Europeanization from Within. The interpretation, implementation and instrumentalization of European spatial planning in Austria and Finland. Doctoral Dissertations. Aalto University.
Radaelli C. M., 2004. Europeanization: solution or problem? European Integration Online Papers, vol. 8, no. 16, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2004-016.htm [12 December 2018].
Sassen S., 2006. Migration, citizenship, ethnos. Palgrave Macmillan.
Schimmelfenning F., Sedelmeier U. (eds.), 2005. The Europeanization of central and eastern Europe. Cornell University Press.
Servillo L., 2010. Territorial Cohesion Discourses: Hegemonic Strategic Concepts in European Spatial Planning. Planning Theory and Practice, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 397-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2010.500135
Servillo L., De Bruijn M., 2018. From LEADER to CLLD: The adoption of the new fund opportunities and of their local development options. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, vol. 3, 223-233.
Smas L., Lidmo J., 2018. Organising regions: spatial planning and territorial governance practices in two Swedish regions. Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 21-36.
Stead D., Cotella G., 2011. Differential Europe. disP, vol. 186, no. 3, pp. 12-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557139
Stead D., Cotella G., 2011. Spatial planning and the influence of domestic actors. Some conclusions. disP, vol. 186, no. 3, pp. 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557146
Swyngedouw E., 2000. Authoritarian governance, power, and the politics of rescaling. Environment and planning D: Society and space, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9s
Valkenburg G., Cotella G., 2016. Governance of energy transitions: about inclusion and closure in complex sociotechnical problems. Energy, Sustainability and Society, vol. 6, no. 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-016-0086-8
Vedung E., Rist R. C., Bemelmans-Videc M. L. (eds.), 1998. Carrots, sticks & sermons: policy instruments and their evaluation. Transaction Publishers.
Walsh C., Kannen A., 2019. Planning at Sea: Shifting Planning Practices at the German North Sea Coast. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, Spatial Research and Planning, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2478/rara-2019-0020
Waterhout B., 2008. The institutionalisation of European spatial planning. vol. 18, IOS Press.
Williams B., Varghese J., 2018. Examining the impact of EU cohesion policies aiming to reduce regional and social disparities with examples of policy impacts in Ireland. Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 89-110.
Williams M. D., Williams R. H., 1996. European Union spatial policy and planning. SAGE.
Wishlade F., Yuill D., Mkendez C., 2003. Regional policy in the EU: a passing phase of Europeanisation or a complex case of policy transfer? University of Strathclyde, European Policies Research Centre.
Zaucha J., 2018. Book Review: The Poverty of Territorialism. A Neo-Medieval View of European Spatial Planning. Europa XXI, vol. 35, pp. 127-132.

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

35

Start page:

5

End page:

20

Format:

File size 0,6 MB ; application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:72529 ; 1429-7132 (print) ; 2300-8547 (online) ; 10.7163/Eu21.2018.35.1

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Material outside of copyright protection. May be used without restrictions following from economic copyrights ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Operational Program Digital Poland, 2014-2020, Measure 2.3: Digital accessibility and usefulness of public sector information; funds from the European Regional Development Fund and national co-financing from the state budget.

Objects

Similar

This page uses 'cookies'. More information