Object structure

Title:

Oblicza współczesnej archeologii w ujęciu porównawczym. Na marginesie pracy Comparative archaeologies: a sociological view of the science of the past, Ludomir R. Lozny red., New York 2011

Subtitle:

Archeologia Polski T. 57 Z. 1-2 (2012)

Creator:

Barford, Paul M. ; Tabaczyński, Stanisław (1930– )

Publisher:

Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Date issued/created:

2012

Description:

25 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Subject and Keywords:

marxism ; paradigms ; sociology of archaeology ; anthropology ; culture-historical archaeology ; politics ; nationalism ; "Great Tradition" ; "Great Divide"

References:

Abramowicz A. 1991. Historia archeologii polskiej XIX i XX wiek, Warszawa–Łódź
Anderson B. 1991. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, wyd. 2, Londyn
Atkinson J. A., Banks I., O’Sullivan J. red. 1996. Nationalism and archaeology, Glasgow
Barford P. M. 1995. Marksizm w archeologii polskiej w latach 1945–1975, „Archeologia Polski”, t. 40, z. 1–2, s. 7–78
Bate L. F. 1998. El proceso de investigación en Arqueología, Barcelona
Bernal M. 1985. Black Athena: Afro-Asiatic roots of classical civilization, t. I–III, New Brunswick, N. J
Binford S. R., Binford L. R. red. 1968. New perspectives in archaeology, Chicago
Blij H. de, 2008. The power of place: geography, destiny, and globalization’s rough landscape, Oxford
Bursche A., Taylor T. 1991. A panorama of Polish archaeology, „Antiquity”, t. 65, s. 583–592
Byrne D. 1991. Western hegemony in archaeological heritage management, „History and Anthropology”, t. 5, s. 269–276
Chapman J. 1980. Evolution récente de l’archéologie théorique en Grande-Bretagne, „Nouvelles de l’Archéologie”, nr 3, s. 16–28
Clarke D. L. 1968. Analytical archaeology, London
Davis D. D. 1996. Revolutionary archaeology in Cuba, „Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory”, t. 3(2), s. 159–188
Díaz-Andreu M., Champion T. red. 1996. Nationalism and archaeology in Europe, London
Dolukhanov P. M. 2005. Archaeology in Russia and its impact on archaeological theory, [w:] P.J. Ucko red., s. 321–333
English Heritage. 2000. Power of place: the future of the historic environment, Londyn
Flannery K. 1994. Childe the evolutionist, [w:] The archaeology of Gordon Childe, D.R. Harris red., Chicago, s. 101–119
Galaty M., Watkinson C. red. 2004. Archaeology under dictatorship, New York
Gathercole P., Lowenthal D. red. 1989. The politics of the past, London
Gieysztor A. 1950. Polskie badania wczesnodziejowe w r. 1950, „Przegląd Zachodni”, t. 13, s. 193–197
Hall M. J. 2005. Great Zimbabwe and the lost city: the cultural colonization of the South African past, [w:] P. J. Ucko red., s. 28–45
Harris M. 1984. Materialismo culturale. La lotta per una scienza della cultura, Milano
Hayden D. 1997. The power of place: urban landscapes as public history, Cambridge
Hensel W. 1951. Próba periodyzacji najdawniejszych dziejów ziem polskich, „Sprawozdania P.M.A.”,t. 4, s. 17–31
Hołubowicz W. 1951. Zagadnienie periodyzacji dziejów społeczeństwa przedklasowego na terenie Polski, „Sprawozdania P.M. A.”, t. 4, s. 1–16
Johnson M. 2000. Archaeological theory. An introduction, Oxford
Kepecs S. 2010. Introduction, new currents in Cuban archaeology, [w:] Beyond the blockade: newcurrents in Cuban archaeology (Caribbean archaeology and ethnohistory), S. Kepecs,L.A. Curet, G. La Rosa Corzo red., s. 1–12
Klejn L. S. 1977. A panorama of theoretical archaeology, „Current Anthropology”, t. 18 (1), s. 1–42
Klejn L. S. 2011. Istoriâ archeologičeskoj mysli, t. I–II, S. Peterburg
Kohl P. L., Fawcett C. red. 1995. Nationalism, politics and the practice of archaeology, Cambridge
Kołakowski L. 1988. Główne nurty marksizmu: powstanie, rozwój, rozkład, Londyn
Kołakowski L. 2005. Main currents of Marxism: the founders, the golden age, the breakdown, New York
Kozłowski J. K. 1975. Las industrias de la piedra tallada de Cuba en el contexto del Caribe, Serie Arquelógica, nr 5, Havana
Lozny L. R. red. 2011. Comparative archaeologies: a sociological view of the science of the past, New York
Masson V. 1976. Economy and social structure of ancient societies, Leningrad
McGuire R. H. 1992. A Marxist archaeology, San Diego–New York–Boston–London–Tokyo–Toronto
Meskell L. red. 1998. Archaeology under fire: nationalism, politics and heritage in the Eastern Mediterraneanand Middle East, London
Morgan L. H. 1877. Ancient society or researches in the times of human progress from savagery, throughbarbarism to civilization, New York
Oyuela-Caycedo A., Anaya A., Elera C. G., Valdez L. M. 1997. Social archaeology in Latin America? Comments to T.C. Patterson, „American Antiquity”, t. 62 (ii), s. 365–374
Patterson T. C. 1984. Social archaeology in Latin America: an appreciation, „American Antiquity”, t. 59 (iii), s. 531–537
Politis G. G. 2003. The theoretical landscape and the methodological development of archaeology in LatinAmerica, „American Antiquity”, t. 68 (ii), s. 245–272
Renfrew C. 1980. The Great Tradition versus the Great Divide: archaeology as anthropology?, „AmericanJournal of Archaeology”, t. 84, s. 287–294
Renfrew C., Bahn P. 1996. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, London
Seligman C.G. 1930. The races of Africa, London
Szacki J. 2002. Historia myśli socjologicznej. Wydanie nowe, Warszawa
Sztompka P. 2005. Socjologia zmian społecznych, Kraków
Tabaczyński S. 1995. A future for the Marxist paradigm in central European archaeology? The Polishcase, [w:] Whither archaeology? Papers in honour of Evžen Neustupný, M. Kuna,N. Venclová red., Praha, s. 69–81
Tabaczyński S. w druku, Socjologia pradziejów. Zarys problematyki, [w:] Przeszłość społeczna. Próba konceptualizacji
Tabío E., Rey E. 1966. Prehistoria de Cuba, Havana
Taylor W. 1948. A study of archaeology, Menasha
Trigger B. G. 1976. The children of Aataentsic: a history of the Huron people to 1660, Montreal
Trigger B. G. 1980. Archaeology and the image of the American Indian, American Antiquity”, t. 45 (iv), s. 662–676
Trigger B. G. 1984. Alternative archaeologies: nationalist, colonialist, imperialist, „Man”, t. 19, s. 355–370
Trigger B. G. 2008. „Alternative archaeologies” in historical perspective. Evaluating multiple narrativesbeyond nationalist colonialist imperialist archaeologies, [w:] Evaluating multiple narratives:beyond nationalist, colonialist, imperialist archaeologies, J. Habu, C. Fawcett,J.M. Matsunaga red., New York, s. 187–195
Ucko P. J. red. 2005. Theory in archaeology: a world perspective, London–New York
Vargas Arenas I. 1995. The perception of history and archaeology in Latin America: a theoretical approach,[w:] Making alternative histories: the practice of archaeology and history in non-western settings, P.R. Schmidt, T.C. Patterson red., Santa Fe, s. 47–68
Waterbolk H. T. 1981. Archaeology in the Netherlands, Delta archaeology, [w:] Regional traditions of archaeologicalresearch I., B.G. Trigger, I. Glover red., „World Archaeology”, t. 13 (ii), s. 240–254
Willey G. R., Phillips P. 1958. Method and theory in American archeology, Chicago

Relation:

Archeologia Polski

Volume:

57

Issue:

1-2

Start page:

261

End page:

293

Resource type:

Text

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

0003-8180

Source:

IAiE PAN, call no. P 320 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 321 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 319 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

pol

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Library of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Projects co-financed by:

Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure ; European Union. European Regional Development Fund

Access:

Open

×

Citation

Citation style: