Place of publishing:
Subject and Keywords:
Europe is changing. The grand societal challenges which shape the European development have a considerable influence on our governance systems and the possible development paths in different parts of Europe, its regions and cities. Based on the results of the FP7 research project FLAGSHIP, this article discusses possible governance and territorial futures for Europe – constantly balancing between daydreams and nightmares. The end of this article contains a plea for shared territorial vision for Europe.
1. Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A., 2012. Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty, 1. New York: Crown Publication. ; 2. Böhme K., Holstein F., Toptsidou M., 2015. Report on the Assessment of Territorial Cohesion and the Territorial Agenda 2020 of the European Union. Luxembourg: Luxembourg ministry of sustainable development and infrastructures on behalf of the EU Trio Presidency. ; 3. Böhme K., Zillmer S., Toptsidou M., Holstein F., 2015. Territorial Governance and Cohesion Policy. Study. IP/B/REGI/IC/2015-095. July 2015. Brussels. ; 4. De Prato G., Nepelski D., 2014. Mapping the European ICT Poles of Excellence. The Atlas of ICT activity in Europe. ; 5. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, McKinsey Centre for Business and Environment, Stiftungsfonds für Umweltökonomie und Nachhaltigkeit, 2015. Growth within: a circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. ; 6. ESPON, 2012. ARTS. Assessment of Regional and Territorial Sensitivity. Final Report. Version 30/07/2012. ; 7. ESPON, 2014. Territories finding a New Momentum: Evidence for Policy Development, Growth and Investment. (No. 3), ESPON Synthesis Report. Luxembourg: ESPON. ; 8. ESPON, 2014. ESPON Atlas. Mapping European Territorial Structures and Dynamics. Luxembourg. ; 9. ESPON, 2014. ET2050. Territorial Scenarios and Visions for Europe. Final Report. Luxembourg: ESPON. ; 10. ESPON, 2013. Territorial Dynamics in Europe: Gateway Functions in Cities, Territorial Observation. Luxembourg: ESPON. ; 11. ESPON, 2013. GREECO. Territorial Potentials for a Greener Economy. (Draft) Final Report. Version 30/05/2014. Vol. 1. Main Report. Luxembourg: ESPON. ; 12. European Commission, 2015. Local and Regional Partners Contributing to Europe 2020: Multi-level governance in support of Europe 2020. Brussels. ; 13. European Commission, 2015. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and to the Committee of the Regions. Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. ; 14. European Commission, 2010. Communication from the Commission to the Council. EUROPE 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Luxembourg. ; 15. Faludi A., 2012. Multi-Level (Territorial) Governance: Three Criticisms. Planning Theory and Practice 13, pp. 197–211 ; - ; 16. Giddens A., 2014. Turbulent and mighty continent: what future for Europe? Cambridge: Polity Press. ; 17. Lüer C., Toptsidou M., Zillmer S., 2014. Calculating regionalised scenarios meeting Europe 2020 objectives [in:] ESPON (ed.), Science in Support of European Territorial Development and Cohesion, ESPON 2013 Scientific Report. Luxembourg: ESPON, pp. 164–168. ; 18. Offe C., 2015. Europe entrapped. Cambridge, Malden: Polity. ; 19. Steinmüller A., Steinmüller K., 2003. Ungezähmte Zukunft : wild cards und die Grenzen der Berechenbarkeit. München: Gerling Akademie Verlag. ; 20. Vogelij J., 2015. Effective strategy making. Co-designing scenarios as a tool for effective strategic planning. Delft: Delft University of Technology. ; 21. Zillmer S., Böhme K., Lüer C., 2015. Territorial Scenarios and Visions of Europe for 2050: Proceedings of the Workhop of the incoming Luxembourg EU Presidency on 23 April 2015. Heisdorf: Spatial Foresight. ; 22. Zillmer S., Lüer C., Toptsidou M., 2014. Transnational perspectives for green and blue growth. How municipalities and regions can promote sustainable growth and use marine resources in the context of INTERREG IV B. BBSR Special Publications.