Object structure

Podłoże teoretyczne podejścia Smart Villages w polityce UE. Perspektywa geograficzna = Theoretical considerations on the Smart Villages approach in the EU Policy: A geographical perspective


Studia Obszarów Wiejskich = Rural Studies, t. 51


Wolski, Oskar : Autor ; Wójcik, Marcin : Autor



Place of publishing:


Date issued/created:



24 cm

Type of object:


Subject and Keywords:

Smart Villages ; smart rural development ; rural development policy ; European Union policy ; rural development concepts


Smart Villages is an approach to rural development currently debated within the realm of the EU policy. This concept highlights the diversity of rural areas and diverse specificity of their development challenges. It also strengthens the role of local communities, aiming to build their attitudes that enable to establish fundaments for development. Hence, it is not to design the very process of development. The approach results from the evolution of a rural development policy. The evolution, on the other hand, stems from the changes of rural areas and their perception. For that reason, the paper aims to discuss the Smart Villages approach in terms of selected contemporary rural development concepts. The paper represents a geographical perspective in the debate concerning smart development and was inspired by the authors’ thoughts on the nature of contemporary specificity related to local development and trends in the evolution of policy at this level.


1. Andersson M., Klaesson J., Larsson J.P., 2016, How Local are Spatial Density Externalities? Neighbourhood Effects in Agglomeration Economies, Regional Studies, 50, 6, s. 1082-1095. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.968119
2. Baldock D., Dwyer J., Lowe P., Petersen J.E., Ward N., 2001, The nature of rural development: towards a sustainable integrated rural policy in Europe, Institute for European Environmental Policy, London.
3. Bilbao-Osorio B., Rodríguez-Pose A., 2004, From R&D to Innovation and Economic Growth in the EU, Growth and Change, 35, 4, s. 434-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00256.x
4. Bosworth G., 2006, Counterurbanisation and Job Creation: Entrepreneurial In-Migration and Rural Economic Development, Centre for Rural Economy Discussion Paper Series, 4, s. 1-16.
5. Bosworth G., Atterton J., 2012, Entrepreneurial In-migraton and Neoendogenous Rural Development, Rural Sociology, 77, 2, s. 254-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00079.x
6. Boyle P., Halfacree K. (red.), 1998, Migration into Rural Areas: Theories and Issues, Wiley.
7. Bryden J., Dawe S., 1998, Development strategies for remote rural regions: What do we know so far?, http://nibio.academia.edu/johnbryden (data dostępu: listopad 2017).
8. Buttimer A., 1976, Grasping the Dynamism of Lifeworld, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 66, s. 277-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1976.tb01090.x
9. Cloke P., 2003, Knowing ruralities, [w:] P. Cloke (red.), Country Visions, Pearson, Harlow, s. 1-13.
10. Crouch D., 2006, Tourism, consumption and rurality, [w:] P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P. Mooney (red.), Handbook of Rural Studies, Sage, London, s. 355-364. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n25
11. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
12. EC - European Commission, 2017a, EU Action for Smart Villages, https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-development-2014-2020/looking-ahead/rur-dev-small-villages_en.pdf (data dostępu: wrzesień 2018).
13. EC - European Commission, 2017b, Guidelines: Evaluation of LEADER/CLLD, Brussels, https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/file/11452/download_en?token=CwgJOvg5 (data dostępu: październik 2018).
14. ENRD - European Network for Rural Development, 2018, Smart Villages. Revitalising Rural Services, EU Rural Review, 26, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/enrd_publications/publi-enrd-rr-26-2018-en.pdf (data dostępu: wrzesień 2018).
15. Fagerberg J., Verspagen B., Caniéls M., 1997, Technology, Growth and Unemployment Across European Regions, Regional Studies, 31, 5, s. 457-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409750132252
16. Flyn A., Marsden T., 1995, Guest editorial, Environment and Planning, A, 27, s. 1180-1192. https://doi.org/10.1068/a271180
17. Galdeano-Gómez E., Aznar-Sánchez J.A., Pérez-Mesa J.C., 2011, The Complexity of Theories on Rural Development in Europe: An Analysis of the Paradigmatic Case of Almería (South-east Spain), Sociologia Ruralis, 51, 1, s. 54-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00524.x
18. Green G.P., Haines A., 2012, Asset Building and Community Development, Sage, Los Angeles.
19. Halfacree K., 2006, Rural space: Constructing a three fold architecture, [w:] P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P. Mooney (red.), Handbook of Rural Studies, Sage, London, s. 44-62. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n4
20. Halfacree K., 2012, Diverse ruralites in the 21st century: From effacement to (re-)invention, [w:] L.J. Kulcsar, K.J. Curts (red.), Internatonal Handbook of Rural Demography, (International Handbooks of Population, 3), Springer Netherlands, s. 387-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5_26
21. Herslund L., 2011, The Rural Creative Class: Counterurbanisation and Entrepreneurship in the Danish Countryside, Sociologia Ruralis, 52, 2, s. 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00560.x
22. Hoggart K., 1990, Let's do away with rural, Journal of Rural Studies, 6, s. 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(90)90079-N
23. Kaleta A., 1992, Podstawowe założenia odnowy obszarów wiejskich Europy, [w:] M. Wieruszewska (red.), Odnowa wsi. Między mitem a nadzieją, Instytut Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Warszawa, s. 13-46.
24. Koster H.R.A., van Ommeren J., Rietveld P., 2014, Is the Sky the Limit? High-Rise Buildings and Office Rents, Journal of Economic Geography, 14, 1, s. 125-153. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbt008
25. Lowe P., Murdoch J., Ward N., 1995, Networks in rural development beyond exogenous and endogenous models, [w:] J.D. van der Ploeg, G. Dijk (red.), Beyond modernisation: The impact of endogenous rural development, Van Gorcum, Assen, s. 87-105.
26. Marsden T., 1999, Rural futures: The consumption countryside and its regulation, Sociologia Ruralis, 39, s. 501-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00121
27. McArdle K., 2012, What makes a successful rural regeneration partnership? The views of successful partners and the importance of ethos for the community development professional, Community Development, 43, 3, s. 333-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2011.621211
28. McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R., 2015, Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy, Regional Studies, 49, 8, s. 1291-1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
29. McKibbon A.K., 2006, Systematic Reviews and Librarians, Library Trends, 55, 1, s. 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0049
30. Morris A., 1998, Geography and Development, UCL Press, London.
31. Murdoch J., Pratt A., 1993, Rural studies: Modernism, postmodernism and the "post rural", Journal of Rural Studies, 9, s. 411-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(93)90053-M
32. Murray M., Dunn L., 1996, Capacity building for rural development in the United States, Journal of Rural Studies, 1, 1, s. 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(94)00056-F
33. Naldi L., Nilsson P., Westlund H., Wixe S., 2015, What is samrt rural development?, Journal of Rural Studies, 40, s. 90-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006
34. OECD, 2006, The New Rural Paradigm. Policies and Governance, OECD: Paris.
35. Picchi A., 1994, The relations between central and local powers as context for endogenous development, [w:] J.D. van der Ploeg, A. Long, (red.), Born from within: Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development, Van Gorcum, Assen, s. 195-203.
36. Rauch J.E., 1993, Productivity Gains from Geographic Concentration of Human Capital: Evidence from the Cities, Journal of Urban Economics, 34, 3, s. 380-400. https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1993.1042
37. Ray Ch., 2000, Endogenous socio-economic development in the European union - issues of evaluation, Journal of Rural Studies, 16, s. 447-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00012-7
38. Ray Ch., 2001, Culture Economies: A perspective on local rural development in Europe, Centre for Rural Economy, https://www.ncl.ac.uk/media/wwwnclacuk/centreforruraleconomy/files/culture-economy.pdf (data dostępu: wrzesień 2018).
39. Relph E., 1976, Place and Placelessness, Pion, London.
40. Romer P.M.,1990, Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 5, s. 71-102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
41. Slee B., 1994, Theoretical aspects of the study of endogenous development, [w:] J.D. van der Ploeg, A. Long, (red.), Born from within: Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development, Van Gorcum, Assen, s. 184-194.
42. Stockdale A., 2005, Incomers: Offering economic potential in rural England, Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, 166, s. 1-5.
43. Stockdale A., 2006, Migration: Pre-requisite for rural economic regeneration?, Journal of Rural Studies, 22, s. 354-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.11.001
44. Terluin I.J., 2003, Differences in economic development in rural regions of advanced countries: an overview and critical analysis of theories, Journal of Rural Studies 19, s. 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00071-2
45. Tuan Y.-F., 1987, Przestrzeń i miejsce (tłum. A. Morawińska), Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, Warszawa.
46. van der Ploeg J.D., Renting H., Brunori G., Knickel K., Mannion J., Marsden T., de Roest K., Sevilla-Guzmán E., Ventura F., 2000, Rural Development: From Practices and Policies towards Theory, Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 4, s. 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00156
47. Ward N., Atterton J., Kim T.-Y., Lowe P., Phillipson J., Thompson N., 2005, Universities, the Knowledge Economy and 'Neo-Endogenous Rural Development', Centre for Rural Economy Discussion Paper Series, 1, s. 1-15.
48. Ward N., Brown D., 2009, Placing the Rural in Regional Development, Regional Studies, 43, 10, s. 1237-1244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903234696
49. Wierzbicki Z., 1970, Aktywizacja społeczności lokalnych (Stosowana socjologia wsi), [w:] A.L. Bertrand, Z. Wierzbicki (red.), Socjologia wsi w Stanach Zjednoczonych, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków.
50. Wolski O., 2018, The Place of Rural Areas in Regional Development Concepts and Processes, [w:] P. Nijkamp, K. Kourtit (red.), Rurality in an Urbanized World, Shaker, Maastricht/Aachen (w druku).
51. Wolski O., 2018, Smart Villages in the EU policy: How to Match Innovativeness and Pragmatism?, Wieś i Rolnictwo, 4, 181, s. 163-179.
52. Wójcik M., 2012, Geografia wsi w Polsce. Studium zmiany podstaw teoretyczno-metodologicznych, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź. https://doi.org/10.18778/7525-657-4
53. Wójcik M., 2013, Przemiany społeczno-przestrzenne osiedli wiejskich. Studium przypadku Łódzkiego Obszaru Metropolitalnego, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź. https://doi.org/10.18778/7969-047-3
54. Wójcik M., (red.), 2018, Inteligentny rozwój obszarów wiejskich (smart rural development): koncepcja, wymiary, metody, Global Point, Łódź.


Studia Obszarów Wiejskich



Start page:


End page:


Resource type:


Detailed Resource Type:



File size 0,3 MB ; application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

1642-4689 ; 10.7163/SOW.51.8


CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call no. Cz.4488 ; CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call no. Cz.4489 ; click here to follow the link



Language of abstract:



Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Operational Program Digital Poland, 2014-2020, Measure 2.3: Digital accessibility and usefulness of public sector information; funds from the European Regional Development Fund and national co-financing from the state budget.





Citation style: