Przegląd Geograficzny T. 89 z. 4 (2017)
In recent years, Polish geographers have become increasingly interested in publishing their research results in English-language journals under the ISI Master Journal List (also known as the “Philadelphia List” in Poland). On the one hand, such an interest has arisen out of the desire to disseminate the results of individual or team research; while on the other it reflects the necessity for appropriate output to be calculated, in order that scientific advancement and parametric evaluation of the scientific institute may take place. Against that background, the work presented here has sought to assess the diversification of geographical centres in Poland, on the basis of an analysis of the published output of their independent employees (habilitated doctors and professors). A separate issue is to investigate the academic achievements of independent scientific workers, as regards age group, sub-discipline (physical or socio-economic geography), and scientific status (habilitated doctor or professor). The analyses were based on the bibliographical database within the Web of Sciences Core Collection, as well as Google Scholar. The analysis of bibliometric indicators referring to the work published by independent researchers shows that Poland’s leading geographical institutions are primarily large centres, first and foremost those in which scientists tend to specialise in physical geography. These are centres conducting numerous research projects, engaging in extensive scientific cooperation in Poland and abroad and publishing their own scientific journals. Among the leading geographical institutions are the University of Gdańsk, Jagiellonian University, University of Lódź, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences, University of Warsaw, University of Wrocław and University of Szczecin. In terms of works published in domestic journals, the two sub-disciplines of geography are characterised by similar bibliometric indicators for an average representative. In contrast, in the case of international journals, there is an evident predominance of those representing physical geography. Conducted analyses also show that physical geographers more often publish as teams. The output of physical geographers is also more universal in character, meaning that extensive use can be made of them in the study of global processes. Socio-economic geographers generally focus their attention on research within the region in which their institution is located, or else deal with social and economic phenomena in their own country. Analysis of bibliometric indicators by age groups of researchers seems to offer optimism for the future. In the case of Google Scholar, older workers present higher values than their younger colleagues, but these differences – apart from citation number that reflect a longer presence on the publishing market – are not very great. However, in the case of the Web of Science, generally offering a better reflection of the level of scientific impact and involvement in international collaboration, young researchers rank higher than their older colleagues. It is therefore to be hoped that their impact in worldwide geography will be greater in the coming years than at present.
1. Bajerski A., 2008, Ranking ośrodków geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej w Polsce na podstawie cytowań w bazach Web of Science, Przegląd Geograficzny, 80, 4, s. 579-589.
2. Bajerski A., 2008, Polskie czasopisma geograficzne w bazie Scopus: próba analizy komunikacji naukowej w polskiej geografii, Czasopismo Geograficzne, 79, 3, s. 367-382.
3. Bański J., 2010, Stan krytyczny polskiej geografii – krytyka stanu, Przegląd Geograficzny, 82, 3, s. 319-333.
https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2010.3.1 -
4. Bański J., 2015, Potencjał i aktywność kadry naukowej w polskich ośrodkach geograficznych, Przegląd Geograficzny, 87, 2, s. 279-298.
https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2015.2.4 -
5. Drabek A., 2001, Bibliometryczna analiza czasopism naukowych w dziedzinie nauk społecznych, Uniwersytet Śląski, maszynopis, http://www.sbc.org.pl/Content/6962/doktorat1923.pdf
6. Frączek R., 2004, Naukometria: za i przeciw stosowaniu metod ilościowych w naukoznawstwie i polityce naukowej, Praktyka i Teoria Informacji Naukowej, 1, s. 46-47.
7. Klincewicz W., 2007, Mierniki naukometryczne w sterowaniu działalnością naukową i w rankingach placówek, Biuletyn KPZK PAN, 235, Warszawa, s. 255-275.
8. Osiewalska A., 2008, Mierniki oceny czasopism i naukowców, Biuletyn EBIB, http://www.ebib.pl/2008/99/a.php?osiewalska.
9. Racki G., 1998, Najbardziej znane polskie publikacje zagraniczne w dziedzinie Nauk o Ziemi z lat 1981-1995 (na podstawie National Citation Report - Poland), Przegląd Geologiczny, 46, 2, s. 133-137.
10. Racki G., 2001, Najczęściej cytowane polskie publikacje z dziedziny Nauk o Ziemi z lat 90. (na podstawie National Citation Reports - Poland 1999 Instytutu Informacji Naukowej (ISI) w Filadelfi i), Przegląd Geologiczny, 49, 7, s. 584-590.
11. Racki G., 2003, Polskie czasopisma geograficzne a międzynarodowy obieg informacji naukowej, Przegląd Geograficzny, 75, 1, s. 101-119.
12. Racki G., Drabek A., 2013, Cytowania i wskaźnik Hirscha: gdzie szukać, jak obliczać?, Forum Akademickie, 2, s. 40-43.
13. Śleszyński P., 2009, Pozycja polskich czasopism i serii geograficznych w świetle baz Google Scholar, Przegląd Geograficzny, 81, 4, s. 551-578.
https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2009.1.6 -
14. Śleszyński P., 2013, Cytowania polskich czasopism naukowych z zakresu geografii i badań regionalnych po 1990 r., Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 3, s. 75-88.
15. Śleszyński P., 2013, Cytowania i oddziaływanie polskich ośrodków geograficznych według Google Scholar, Przegląd Geograficzny, 85, 4, s. 599-627.
https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2013.4.5 -
File size 0,6 MB ; application/pdf
oai:rcin.org.pl:64382 ; 0033-2143 (print) ; 2300-8466 (on-line) ; 10.7163/PrzG.2017.4.4
CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.181, Cz.3136, Cz.4187 ; click here to follow the link
Creative Commons Attribution BY 3.0 PL license
Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 3.0 PL] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 3.0 PL license, full text available at: ; -
Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure ; European Union. European Regional Development Fund
May 19, 2022
Feb 8, 2018
1416
https://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/publication/83761
Bański, Jerzy (1960– )
Bański, Jerzy (1960– )
Bański, Jerzy (1960– )
Bański, Jerzy (1960– )
Bański, Jerzy (1960– ) Ferenc, Mariola
Bański, Jerzy (1960– )
Bański, Jerzy (1960– )