Object structure


The development of agritourism in Romania and role of financial subsidies allocated under the Common Agricultural Policy


Geographia Polonica Vol. 90 No. 2 (2017)


Galluzzo, Nicola



Place of publishing:


Date issued/created:



24 cm

Type of object:


Subject and Keywords:

panel data ; rural development ; rural tourism ; fixed effect ; countryside ; multiple regression model ; agritourism ; Common Agricultural Policy ; Romania


Romania has experienced considerable growth in agritourism able to meet the demand for sustainable tourism generated on both domestic and European markets. A picturesque landscape, other unique features and cultural heritage have all acted directly to increase agritourism in the country. Against this background, the work detailed in this paper sought to employ a quantitative approach in assessing if the above development of agritourism correlated directly with financial assistance allocated under the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Findings in fact point to a direct impact of funding disbursed under the CAP, while payments disbursed under the so-called second pillar are not found to have impacted on the growth of agritourism. Outcomes with the Epanechnikov kernel method highlight a significant shift in the subsidies allocated under the Common Agricultural Policy via its first and second pillars, with an increase in the total fund disbursed in 2013 as compared with 2007. Subsidies allocated via the second pillar of the CAP can thus be said to have had a pivotal role in supporting investment in on-farm diversification, in this way achieving a partial integration of farmers’ incomes in Romania.


1. Abler D., 2004. Multifunctionality, agricultural policy, and environmental policy. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 8-17.
2. Akaike H., 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle [in:] B.N. Petrov and F. Cszaki (eds.), Second international symposium on information theory, Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, pp.267-281.
3. Anderson K., 2000. Agriculture's 'multifunctionality' and the WTO. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 475-494.
4. Andrei J., Eftimie M., Matei M., 2014. The role of Romanian farms in valuing the inland agricultural potential. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1532-1535.
5. ARD, 2016. Agriculture and Rural Development. Farm Accountancy Data Network. European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/database/database_en.cfm [5 February 2016].
6. Arion F., 2006. Approaches of agritourism promoting through information extension. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Horticulture, vol., 63, no. 1-2, pp. 116-121.
7. Asteriou D., Hall S.G., 2011. Applied econometrics. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
8. Baltagi B.H. 2009. A companion to econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester: Willey.
9. Baltagi B.H., 2011. Econometrics. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
10. Belletti G., Brunori G., Marescotti A., Rossi A., Huylenbroeck G.V., Durand G., 2003. Multifunctionality and rural development: A multilevel approach [in:] G. Van Huylenbroeck, G. Durand (eds.), Multifunctional agriculture: a new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development, Hampshire: Ashgate, pp. 55-80.
11. Bogan E., 2012. Rural tourism as a strategic option for social and economic development in the rural area in Romania. Forum geographic, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 37-43.
12. Bohman M., Cooper J., Mullarkey D., Normile M.A., Skully D., Vogel S., Young E., 1999. The use and abuse of multifunctionality. Washington, D.C: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, http://www.iatp.org/files/Use_and_Abuse_of_Multifunctionality_The.pdf [1 March 2016].
13. Brunstad R.J., Gaasland I., Vårdal E., 2005. Multifunctionality of agriculture: an inquiry into the complementarity between landscape preservation and food security. European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 469-488.
14. Buijs A.E., Pedroli B., Luginbühl Y., 2006. From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: changing social perceptions of the European landscape. Landscape ecology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 375-389.
15. Cahill C., 2001. The multifunctionality of agriculture. EuroChoices, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 36-41.
16. Calina J., Calina A., Stoian M., 2015. The supply tendency of Romanian agritourism. Annals of the University of Craiova-Agriculture, Montanology, Cadastre Series, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 34-37.
17. Chiritescu V., 2011. Sustainable rural development in Romania – Needs and priority objectives. Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 147-160.
18. Creţu R.C., Stefan P., Gheorghe S., Bibicioiu S., 2015. New challenges for rural tourism, specialization of agritourism guest houses. Scientific Papers Series: Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 123-126.
19. Dabija D.C., Băbuţ R., 2013. An approach to sustainable development from tourists' perspective, Empirical Evidence in Romania. Amfiteatru Economic, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 617-633.
20. Faganel A., 2011. Developing sustainable agritourism in Central and East European Countries. Academica Turistica-Tourism and Innovation Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 26-34.
21. Galluzzo N., 2014. The evolution of Italian farms and the role of subsidies paid by the European Union for rural development. Romanian Review of Regional Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 79-88.
22. Galluzzo N., 2015. Relationships between agritourism and certified quality food in Italian rural areas. Romanian Review of Regional Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 77-88.
23. Galluzzo N., 2016. Analysis of subsidies allocated by the common agricultural policy and cropping specialization in Romanian farms using FADN dataset. Scientific Papers Series Management: Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 157-164.
24. Gujarati D., 2011. Econometrics by example. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
25. Hannan E.J., Quinn B.G., 1979. The determination of the order of an autoregression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), vol. 41, no. 2, pp.190-195.
26. Hausman J.A., 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1251-1271.
27. Horlings L.G., Marsden T.K., 2011. Towards the real green revolution? Exploring the conceptual dimensions of a new ecological modernisation of agriculture that could 'feed the world'. Global Environmental Change, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 441-452.
28. Ilbery B., 1998. The geography of rural change. Harlow: Longman.
29. INS, 2016. Institutul Naţional de Statistică - Romania, http://statistici.insse.ro/shop/?lang=ro [20 January 2016].
30. Ion P.Ã., Popescu A., 2013. Agritourism development in Romania in terms of accommodation capacity, tourist arrivals and overnights stays in the period 2005-2010. Lucrări Științifice Management Agricol, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 117-124.
31. Lile R., Stanciu S., Martin S., Rózsa M., 2015. Common agricultural policy for the period 2014-2020 – A solution for agricultural management. Journal of Economics and Business Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 134-144.
32. Mortan M., 2006. Agritourism rural development public administration. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 2, no. 16, pp. 101-105.
33. Ohe Y., Ciani A., 2012. Accessing demand characteristics of agritourism in Italy. Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 281-296.
34. Otiman P.I., 2008. Sustainable development strategy of agriculture and rural areas in Romania on medium and long term: Rural Romania XXI. Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, vol. 5, no. 1-2, pp. 4-18.
35. Otiman P.I., 2009. Rural development and agriculture: Opportunities for mitigating the financial and economic crisis and resuming economic growth. Lucrări Științifice, Universitatea de Științe Agricole Și Medicină Veterinară a Banatului, Timisoara, Seria I, Management Agricol, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 7-42.
36. Pirnea I.C., Lanfranchi M., Giannetto C., 2012. Study on the performance of agritourism sector in Romania. Annals-Economy Series, vol. 2, pp. 176-182.
37. Postelnicu C., Dabija D.C., 2016. Challenges and development prospects for tourism in Romania. Ecoforum, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 84-89.
38. Potter C., Burney J., 2002. Agricultural multifunctionality in the WTO-legitimate non-trade concern or disguised protectionism? Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 35-47.
39. Schwarz G., 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 461-464.
40. Sivini S., 2013. Il comparto agrituristico in Italia. Agriregionieuropa, vol. 32, pp. 82-84.
41. Turnock D., 2005. The poverty problem in rural Romania. Geographia Polonica, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 53-76.
42. Van der Ploeg J.D., 2000. Revitalizing agriculture: Farming economically as starting ground for rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 497-511.
43. Van der Ploeg J.D., 2006. Oltre la modernizzazione. Processi di sviluppo rurale in Europa. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
44. Van der Ploeg J.D., Long A., Banks J., 2002. Living countrysides. Rural development processes in Europe: The state of the art. Doetinchem: Elsevier.
45. Van der Ploeg J.D., Renting H., Brunori G., Knickel K., Mannion J., Marsden. T., de Roest, K., Sevilla-Guzman, Ventura F., 2000. Rural development: From practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 391-408.
46. Van der Ploeg J.D., Roep D., 2003. Multifunctionality and rural development: the actual situation in Europe [in:] G. Van Huylenbroeck, G. Durand (eds.), Multifunctional agriculture: A new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development, Hampshire: Ashgate, pp. 37-53.
47. Verbeek M., 2006. Econometria. Bologna: Zanichelli.
48. Vieri S., 2012. Agricoltura: Settore multifunzionale allo sviluppo. Bologna: Edagricole New Business Media.


Geographia Polonica ; Geographia Polonica





Start page:


End page:


Resource type:


Detailed Resource Type:




Resource Identifier:

0016-7282 ; 10.7163/GPol.0087


CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link




Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure





Citation style: