Object structure

Is the suburbanisation stage always important in the transformation of large urban agglomerations? The case of the Katowice Conurbation


Geographia Polonica Vol. 90 No. 2 (2017)


Krzysztofik, Robert ; Kantor-Pietraga, Iwona ; Runge, Anna ; Spórna, Tomasz



Place of publishing:


Date issued/created:



24 cm

Type of object:


Subject and Keywords:

suburbanisation ; urban agglomeration ; postindustrial region ; urban polycentrism ; Central-Eastern Europe


Suburbanisation represents one of the most important contemporary problems facing large urban agglomerations. An analysis of the development of urban agglomerations in Central-Eastern Europe, and especially Poland, leads to the observation that this problem is not particularly advanced in any of them. The aim of this article has thus been to examine how relevant it might be to consider the suburbanisation stage in large Polish agglomerations, as a permanent feature of the Klaassen/Paelinck and van den Berg models. Specifically, the article focuses on Poland’s seven largest agglomerations, though there is a particular emphasis on the Katowice conurbation. The essence of the study lay in the identification of differences in the population balance between these agglomerations, and above all, between their cores and outer zones. The study also included data on the structure characterising out-migrations. A consequence of the study was to draw attention to the apparent diversity of the Katowice conurbation, the only one in Poland to record a population decline in both the core area and the outer zone. This specificity was explained mainly by the drivers of polycentricity and post-industrialism. In other agglomerations, these elements were either absent altogether or were involved in separate shaping of urban regional space.


1. Bajmocy P., 2012. Suburbanisation and suburban regions in Hungary after 1990 [in:] T. Csapó, A. Balogh (eds.), Development of the settlement network in the Central European countries: Past, present, and future, Berlin, Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag, pp. 207-221.
2. Blotevogell H.H., Schickhoff I., 1986. Suburbanisation in densely populated areas with several foci: The example of the Rhine-Ruhr industrial area [in:] G. Heinritz, E. Lichtenberger (eds.), The take-off of suburbia and the crisis of the inner city: Proceedings of the International Symposium in Munich and Vienna 1984, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 74-98.
3. Brade I., Smigel C., Kovács Z., 2009. Suburban residential development in post-socialist urban regions: The case of Moscow, Sofia, and Budapest [in:] H. Kilper (ed.), New disparities in spatia development in Europe, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 79-104.
4. Cirtautas M., 2013. Urban sprawl of major cities in the Baltic states. Scientific Journal of Riga Technical University, ser.10, Architecture and Urban Planning, pp. 72-79.
5. Couch C., Leontidou L., Petschel-Held G. (eds.), 2007. Urban sprawl in Europe. Landscapes: Land-use change and policy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
6. CSO, 1990. Statistical Yearbook of Poland, 1990. Number of vehicles in Poland, 1989. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office.
7. CSO, 2014. Population Projection 2014-2050. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office.
8. CSO, 2015. Statistical Yearbook of Poland, 2015. Number of vehicles in Poland, 2014. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office.
9. Dostál P., Hampl M., 2008. Development of national settlement systems in the industrial and post-industrial areas: A general discussion and the case of the Czech Republic [in:] W. Strubelt, G. Gorzelak (eds.), City and Regions: Papers in honour of Jiří Musil, Leverkusen Opladen: Budrich Uni Press, pp. 43-54.
10. EU, 2006. Urban sprawl in Europe: The ignored challenge. European Commission, Luxembourg, Copenhagen: Joint Research Centre, European Environment Agency.
11. Gans P., 2000. Urban population change in large cities in Germany, 1980-94. Urban Studies, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1497-1512.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980020080231 -
12. Haase A., Bernt M., Grossman K., Mykhnenko V., 2013. Varieties of shrinkage in European cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 23, no. 1, pp 86-102.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776413481985 -
13. Hänsgen D., Lenz S., Tzschaschel S., 2010. Deutschlandatlas: Unser Land in 200 thematischen Karten. Darmstadt: WBG.
14. Hoekveld J.J., 2015. Spatial differentiation of population development in a declining region: The case of Saarland. Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Human Geography, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 47-68.
https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12065 -
15. Kabisch N., Haase D., 2011. Diversifying European agglomerations: Evidence of urban population trends for the 21st century. Population, Space and Place, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 236-253.
https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.600 -
16. Kabisch N., Haase D., Haase A., 2012. Urban population development in Europe, 1991-2008: The examples of Poland and the UK. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1326-1348.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01114.x -
17. Kantor-Pietraga I., 2014. Systematyka procesu depopulacji miast na obszarze Polski od XIX do XXI wieku. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
18. Klaassen L.H., Palinck J.H.P., 1979. The future of large towns. Environment and Planning A, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1095-1104.
https://doi.org/10.1068/a111095 -
19. Kok H., 1999. Migration from the city to the countryside in Hungary and Poland. GeoJournal, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 53-62.
20. Korcelli P., 1972. Urban spatial growth. A wavelike approach. Geographia Polonica, vol. 24, pp. 45-55.
21. Krišjane Z., Berzinš M., 2012. Post-socialist urban trends: New patterns and motivations for migration in the suburban areas of Rīga, Latvia. Urban Studies, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 289-306.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011402232 -
22. Krzysztofik R., Runge J., Kantor-Pietraga I., 2011. Paths of shrinkage in the Katowice Conurbation. Case studies of Bytom and Sosnowiec cities. Sosnowiec: Wydział Nauk o Ziemi Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
23. Leetmaa K., Tammaru T., 2007. Suburbanization in countries in transition: Destinations of suburbanizers in the Tallinn metropolitan area. Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Human Geography, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 127-146.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00244.x -
24. Lisowski A., Mantey D., Wilk W., 2014. Lessons From Warsaw: The lack of coordinated planning and its impact on urban sprawl [in:] K. Stanilov, L. Sýkora (eds.), Confronting suburbanization: Urban decentralization in postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 225-255.
25. Lorens P., 2005. Suburbanizacja w procesie rozwoju miasta postsocjalistycznego [in:] P. Lorens (ed.), Problem suburbanizacji, Biblioteka Urbanisty, 7, Warszawa: Urbanista, pp. 33-44.
26. Maik W. (ed.), 2009. Aglomeracje miejskie w Polsce na przełomie XX i XXI wieku. Problemy rozwoju, przekształceń strukturalnych i funkcjonowania. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Wyższej Szkoły Gospodarki.
27. Marcińczak S., 2012. The evolution of spatial patterns of residential segregation in Central European Cities: The Łódź Functional Urban Region from mature socialism to mature post-socialism. Cities, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 300-309.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.08.008 -
28. Martinez-Fernandez C., Audirac I., Fol S., Cunningham-Sabot E., 2012. Shrinking Cities: Urban Challenges of Globalization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 213-225.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01092.x -
29. Musil J., 1993. Changing urban systems in postcommunist societies in Central Europe: Analysis and prediction, Urban Studies, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 899-905.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989320080841 -
30. Mykhnenko V., Turok I., 2008. East European cities – Patterns of growth and decline, 1960-2005. International Planning Studies, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 311-342.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470802518958 -
31. Nicolaides B.M., Wiese A. (eds.), 2006. The suburb reader. New York, Abingdon: Routledge.
32. Nuissl H., Rink D., 2005. The "production" of urban sprawl in eastern Germany as a phenomenon of post-socialist transformation. Cities, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 123-134.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2005.01.002 -
33. Ouřeniček M., 2007. Differential suburban development in the Prague Urban Region. Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Human Geography, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 111-126.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00243.x -
34. Parysek J.J., 2005. Miasta polskie na przełomie XX i XXI wieku. Rozwój i przekształcenia strukturalne. Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
35. Phelps N.A., Wu F. (eds.), 2011. International perspectives on suburbanization: A post-suburban World? Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
36. Pichler-Milanovič N., Gutry-Korycka M., RINK D., 2007. Sprawl in the post-socialist city: The changing economic and institutional context of Central and Eastern European cities [in:] C. Couch, L. Leontidou, G. Petschel-Held (eds.), Urban sprawl in Europe. Landscapes, Land-Use Change & Policy, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 102-135.
37. Ravetz J., Fertner C., Nielsen T.S., 2013. The dynamics of peri-urbanization [in:] K. Nilsson, S. Pauleit, S. Bell, C. Aalbers, T.S. Nielsen (eds.), Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe. Berlin, Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag, pp. 13-44.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30529-0_2 -
38. Roose A., Kull A., Gauk M., Tali T., 2013. Land use policy shocks in the post-communist urban fringe: A case study of Estonia. Land Use Policy, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 76-83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.02.008 -
39. Rubiera Morollón F., Gonzáles Marroquin V.M., Pérez Rivero J.L., 2016. Urban sprawl in Spain: differences among cities and causes. European Planning Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 207-226.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1080230 -
40. Rumpel P., Slach O., 2012. Je Ostrava "smršťujícím se městem"? Sociologický časopis, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 859-878.
41. Runge J., Krzysztofik R., Kantor-Pietraga I., Spórna T., 2011, Characteristic Features of Urbanization in the Area of Silesian Province (Poland) at the Beginning of 21st Century, Romanian Sociology (Sociologie Românească), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 56-66.
42. Runge J., Kantor-Pietraga I., Krzysztofik R., Runge A., 2014. Model urbanizacji złożonych układów osadniczych w świetle procesu kurczenia się miast w Polsce – próba analizy krytycznej [in:] T. Stryjakiewicz (ed.), Kurczenie się miast w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej, Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, pp. 115-125.
43. Sailer-Fliege U., 1999. Characteristics of postsocialist urban transformation in East Central Europe. GeoJournal, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 7-16.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006905405818 -
44. Salvati L., Carlucci M., 2014. In-between stability and subtle changes: Urban growth, population structure, and the city life cycle in Rome. Population, Space and Place, Early View.
45. Schmidt S., 2011. Sprawl without growth in Eastern Germany. Urban Geography, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 105-128.
https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.32.1.105 -
46. Schmidt S., Fina S., Ssiedentop S., 2015. Post-socialist sprawl: A cross-country comparison. European Planning Studies, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1357-1380.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.933178 -
47. Scott A.J., 2001. Globalization and the rise of cityregions. European Planning Studies, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 813-826.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310120079788 -
48. Śleszyński P., 2006. Demograficzny wymiar procesów suburbanizacji w Polsce po 1989 roku [in:] S. Kozłowski (ed.), Żywiołowe rozprzestrzenianie się miast: Narastający problem aglomeracji miejskich w Polsce. Studia nad zrównoważonym rozwojem, vol. 2, Białystok-Lublin-Warszawa: Wydział Ekonomia i Środowisko, pp. 105-123.
49. Sokołowski D., 2006. Funkcje centralne i hierarchia funkcjonalna miast w Polsce. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
50. Stanilov K., Sýkora L. (eds.), 2014, Confronting suburbanization: Urban decentralization in postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
51. Steinführer A., Haase A., 2007. Demographic change as future challenge for cities in East Central Europe. Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Human Geography, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 183-195.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00247.x -
52. Stiftung Demographischer Wegweiser, 2006. Wegweiser Demographischer Wandel 2020. Analysen und Handlungkonzepte für Städte und Gemeinden. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann Stiftung Verlag.
53. Sýkora L., Bouzarovski S., 2012. Multiple transformations: Conceptualising the post-communist urban transition. Urban Studies, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 43-60.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010397402 -
54. Sýkora L., Ouřeniček M., 2007. Sprawling post-communist metropolis: Commercial and residential suburbanization in Prague and Brno, the Czech Republic [in:] E. Razin, M. Dijst, C. Vázquez (eds.), Employment deconcentration in European Metropolitan Areas: Market forces versus planning regulations, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 209-233.
55. Szirmai V., 2012. Urban sprawl in Europe. Regional Statistics, no. 01, pp. 129-148.
56. Turok I., Mykhnenko V., 2007. The trajectories of European cities, 1960-2005. Cities, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 165-182.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2007.01.007 -
57. van den Berg L., Drewett R., Klaassen L.H., Rossi A., Vijwerberg C.H.T., 1982. Urban Europe: A study of growth and decline. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
58. Ye L., Wu A.M., 2014. Urbanization, land development, and land financing: Evidence from Chinese cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 354-368.
ttps://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12105 -
59. Zborowski A., Soja M., Łobodzińska A., 2012. Population trends in Polish cities – stagnation, depopulation or shrinkage? Prace Geograficzne,vol. 130, Kraków: Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej UJ, pp. 7-28.


Geographia Polonica





Start page:


End page:


Resource type:


Detailed Resource Type:



File size 2,9 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

0016-7282 ; 10.7163/GPol.0082


CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link




Creative Commons Attribution BY-SA 3.0 PL license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY-SA 3.0 PL] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY-SA 3.0 PL license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure





Citation style: