Metadata language
Geographia Polonica Vol. 82 No. 2 (2009)
Creator:Cudlinova, Eva ; Pelucha, Martin
Publisher: Place of publishing: Date issued/created: Description: Type of object: Subject and Keywords:rolnictwo ; rozwój wiejski ; wielofunkcyjność
Abstract:Multifunctional agriculture is nowadays a key issue of the second pillar of the EU’s Common Agriculture Policy. The concept of multifunctional agriculture is also seen as a possible development scenario for EU rural areas. But the question of the territorial impact of such policy tools has been raised. The main aim of the paper is to analyze the application of the multifuncionality concept in selected EU countries. In particular, the paper engages in a critical reflection of multifunctional agriculture as a specific scenario for rural development in the Czech Republic in the previous period of the programme, 2004 – 2006.
References:
1. Baldwin, R., Wyplosz, Ch. (2008), Ekonomie evropské integrace [The economics of the European Integration], Prague, Grada Publishing.
2. Bowler, I.R., Bryant, C.R. and Cocklin, C. (eds.) (2002), The Sustainability of Rural Systems: Geographical Interpretations, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3471-4 -
3. Bureau, J. Ch. (2002), Enlargement and reform of th EU Common Agricultural Policy – impacts on the western hemisphere Countries, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington D.C.
4. Bureau, J.Ch., Mahé, P.L. (2008), CAP reform beyond 2013: An idea for a longer view, Notre Europe.
5. Caffyn, A. and Dahlström, M. (2005), Urban-Rural Interdependecies: Joining Policy in Practice, Regional Studies, Vol. 39.3, pp. 283-296.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0034340050086580 -
6. Czech Statistical Office (2008), Total employment in national economy – according to the NACE-A01, A 01 Agriculture, hunting and related activities + A 02, B Forestry and related activities, fishing and fish breeding.
7. Dwyer, J., Ward, N., Lowe, P. and Baldock, D. (2007), European Rural Development under the Common Agricultural Policy’s Second Pillar": Institutional Conservatism and Innovation, Regional Studies, Vol. 41.7, pp. 873 – 887.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400601142795 -
8. EUROSTAT (2008a), Agricultural Labour Input Statistics: indices (2000=100),available from: <http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page?_pageid=0,1 136206,0_45570467&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL>, accessed December 20 2008.
9. EUROSTAT (2008b), Economic accounts for agriculture - values at current prices - GROSS VALUE ADDED AT BASICPRICES, available from: <http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/extraction/retrieve/en/theme5/aact/aact_eaa01?OutputDir=EJOutputDir_1392&user=unknown&clientsessionid=0BC3DA90125A1C1FDDA79D9CFFB2043E.extraction_worker1&OutputFile=aact_eaa01.htm&OutputMode=U&NumberOfCells=324&Language=en&OutputMime=text%2Fhtml&>, accessed December 20 2008.
10. FADN (Farm Accountancy Data Network) (2008) – data provided for the ex-post evaluation of the HRDP (Horizontal Rural Development Programme 2004-2006 for the Czech Republic).
11. Hadyński, J. (2006), Presentation within the conference Third Seminar of the European Academy of Regions, July 2006, Europaische Rechtsakademie Trier, Germany.
12. Ilbery, B. (1998), The Geography of Rural Change, London, Longman.
13. Johnson, G.T. (2001), The rural economy in a new century, International Regional Science Review 24, 1: 21–37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016001701761012953 -
14. Knickel, K. (2001), The marketing of Rhöngold milk: an example of the reconfiguration of natural relations with agricultural production and consumption, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 3 (2): 123-136.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jepp.79 -
15. Korcelli, P. (2008), Scenarios on the Territorial Future of Europe: A Commentary and Further Implications, Europa XXI, 18: 39 – 46.
16. Mahé, P.L., Ortalo-Magné, F. (1999), Five proposals for a European model of the countryside, Economic Policy, 14 (28): 87-131.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00045 -
17. Marsden, T., Bristow, G. (2002), The social management of rural nature: understanding agrarian-based rural development, Environment and Planning A, 34: 809 – 825.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a3427 -
18. MoA CR (2007), Zpráva o stavu zemědělství ČR za rok 2007 [Report on the state of agriculture in the Czech Republic 2007)], Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
19. OECD (2001), Multifunctionality – towards an analytical framework, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
20. SAIF (State Agricultural Investment Fund) (2008) – data provided for the ex-post evaluation of the HRDP (Horizontal Rural Development Programme 2004-2006 for the Czech Republic).
21. Shucksmith, M., Thompson J.K., Roberts, D. (2005), The CAP and the Regions: the Territorial Impact of the Common Agricultural Policy, Oxfordshire, Cambridge: CAB International.
22. Tangermann, S. (2006), The Future of the CAP under WTO Reform Pressure, a presentation delivered at a conference on Vision of a Long-Term Agricultural and Rural Development in EU, Prague.
23. Ward, N. (2002), Setting the next agenda? British and French approaches to the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy, Journal of Rural Studies, 18: 1-17.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00025-0 -
24. Wilson, G.A. (2007), Multifunctional agriculture: a transition theory perspective, Wallingford, CAB International.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781845932565.0000 -
Rozmiar pliku 1,1 MB ; application/pdf
Resource Identifier:0016-7282 ; 10.7163/GPol.2009.2.5
Source:CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link
Language: Rights:Prawa zastrzeżone - dostęp nieograniczony
Terms of use: Digitizing institution:Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Original in: Projects co-financed by:Unia Europejska. Europejski Fundusz Rozwoju Regionalnego ; Program Operacyjny Innowacyjna Gospodarka, lata 2010-2014, Priorytet 2. Infrastruktura strefy B + R
Access: