RCIN and OZwRCIN projects

Object

Title: The Green Agenda for the Western Balkans – an exercise in experimentalist macro-regional governance

Subtitle:

Europa XXI 49 (2025)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

29 cm

Abstract:

The Green Agenda for the Western Balkans (GAWB) aims to build transnational cooperation in the Western Balkan (WB) region under key green agenda policy themes. This article explores whether the GAWB development and implementation process reflects an exercise in experimentalist macro-regional governance in the WBs. The GAWB process is examined through the lens of experimentalist governance and its four core dimensions. The assessment indicates that an experimentalist macroregional governance logic is driving GAWB processes, which promote coherence between WB countries under green agenda policies. The GAWB, therefore, lays the foundations for future macro-regional strategy building within the WB region.

References:

Allmendinger, P., Chilla, T., & Sielker, F. (2014). Europeanizing Territoriality - Towards Soft Spaces? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(11), 2703-2717, https://doi.org/10.1068/a130037p DOI
Berisha, E. (2023), The Adriatic Ionian Region: challenges and opportunities in the time of geopolitical tensions and the rule of EUSAIR. Economia Marche - Journal of Applied Economics, 42(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.57638/1120-9593AIREGION DOI
Berisha, E. (2025). Moving towards an inclusive Green Agenda in the Western Balkans. Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12092.76162 DOI
Berisha, E. (2026). Green EU Integration: The Role of the Green Agenda in Accelerating Just Green Transitions in the Western Balkans. In E. Berisha, J., Moodie, L., Allkja & M., Jeftić (Eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Just Green Transitions in the Western Balkans and Beyond (pp.359-380). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95075-9_20 DOI
Berisha, E., & Cotella, G. (2024). Europeanisation of spatial planning. The Western Balkans between innovation and resistance. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 25(3), 355-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2024.2352890 DOI
Börzel, T. A. (2012). Experimentalist governance in the EU: The emperor's new clothes? Regulation & Governance, 6(3), 378-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01159.x DOI
De Búrca, G. (2017). Human rights experimentalism. American Journal of International Law, 111(2), 277-316. htpps://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2016.16 DOI
Dewey. J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
Eckert, S., & Börzel, T. A. (2012). Experimentalist governance: An introduction. Regulation & Governance, 6(3), 371-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01163.x DOI
EU4GREEN (2025). Comprehensive documentation of the development of emission reduction commitments (ERCS) for 2020-2029 and for 2030 and beyond for the six Western Balkan economies. Technical Report - final. Retrieved from https://eu4green.eu/library/
EC (2009). European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. COM (2009) 248 Final. Brussels, 10.6.2009. European Commission. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/eustrategy-for-the-baltic-sea-region.html
EC (2013) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Concerning the Added Value of Macro-regional Strategies, COM(2013) 468 final, Brussels, 27 June 2013. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52013DC0468
EC (2016). Report from the Commission on the implementation of EU macro-regional strategies. COM(2016) 805 final. Brussels, 16.12.2016. European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/information-sources/publications/reports/2016/report-on-the-implementation-of-eu-macro-regional-strategies_en
Fossum, J. E. (2012). Reflections on experimentalist governance. Regulation & Governance, 6(3), 394-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01158.x DOI
Gänzle, S. (2017). Macro-regional strategies of the European Union (EU) and experimentalist design of multi-level governance: the case of the EU strategy for the Danube region. Regional & Federal Studies, 27(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2016.1270271 DOI
Gänzle, S. (2018). 'Experimental Union' and Baltic Sea cooperation: the case of the European Union's Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR). Regional Studies, Regional Science, 5(1), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2018.1532315 DOI
Gänzle, S. (2019). Experimentalist governance and EU macro-regional strategies: new dynamics in European regional and territorial cooperation? In G., Abels & J., Battke (Eds.). Regional Governance in the EU (pp. 140-158). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978620.00018 DOI
Gänzle, S., & Mirtl, J. (2017). Experimentalist governance in a multi-level environment: the EU's macro-regional strategies for the Baltic Sea and Danube Regions. In J., Tondal (Ed.). The Rise of Common Political Order (pp. 154-176). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI
Gänzle, S., & Mirtl, J. (2019). Experimentalist governance beyond European Territorial Cooperation and cohesion policy: macro-regional strategies of the European Union (EU) as emerging 'regional institutions'? Journal of European Integration, 41(2), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1580277 DOI
Gerritsen, M., Kooij, H.-J., Groenleer, M., & van der Krabben, E. (2022). To See, or Not to See, That Is the Question: Studying Dutch Experimentalist Energy Transition Governance through an Evolutionary Lens. Sustainability, 14(3), 1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031540 DOI
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. DOI
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, But How? Types of Multi-level Governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233-243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000649 DOI
Interview (2024). Interviews conducted by authors with different stakeholders in Belgrade, Sarajevo and Skopje between May 15th to May 24th 2024. Annex 1.
Jones, R., & Whitehead, M. (2018). 'Politics done like science': Critical perspectives on psychological governance and the experimental state. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36(2), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817748330 DOI
Kocollari, L (2023). Open Balkan - the end of the initiative or a new beginning? Think Visegrad Non-V4. Retrieved from https://think.visegradfund.org/wp-content/uploads/Open-Balkan-%E2%80%93-theend-of-the-initiative-or-a-new-beginning_L.Kocollari.pdf
Kosov, Y., & Gribanova, G. (2016). EU strategy for the Baltic Sea region: challenges and perspectives of international cooperation. Baltic region, 8(2), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2016-2-3 DOI
Mathieu, E., & Rangoni, B. (2019). Balancing experimentalist and hierarchical governance in European Union electricity and telecommunications regulation: A matter of degrees. Regulation & Governance, 13(4), 577-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12254 DOI
Moodie, J., Giacometti, A., Itänen, M., & Berisha, E. (2025). Macroregional Pathways for the Green Agenda in the Western Balkans, Deliverable 2.3. Horizon Europe Green FORCE. Retrieved from https://greenforcetwinning.net/publications/
Moodie, J., Tapia, C., Löfving, L., Gassen, N. S., & Cedergren, E. (2021). Towards a territorially just climate transition - Assessing the Swedish EU territorial just transition plan development process. Sustainability, 13(13), 7505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137505 DOI
Popper, K. (1945). The Open Society and its Critics: Volume 1 - The Spell of Plato. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
RCC (2020). Sofia Declaration on the Green Agenda for the Western Balkans. Regional Cooperation Council. Retrieved from https://www.rcc.int/docs/546/sofia-declaration-on-the-green-agenda-forthe-western-balkans-rn
RCC (2021). Action Plan for the Implementation of the Sofia Declaration on the Green Agenda for the Western Balkans 2021-2030. Regional Cooperation Council. Retrieved from https://www.rcc.int/docs/596/action-plan-for-the-implementation-of-the-sofia-declaration-on-the-green-agenda-for-the-western-balkans-2021-2030
RCC (2023). Green Agenda for the Western Balkans Action Plan - Implementation Report 2022. Regional Cooperation Council. Retrieved from https://www.rcc.int/pubs/162/green-agenda-for-the-westernbalkans-action-plan--implementation-report-2022
Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2011). Experimentalism in transnational governance: Emergent pathways and diffusion mechanisms. GR:EEN (Global Reordering: Evolution through European Networks) Working Paper, 3. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/download/80428737/experimentalismintransnationalgovernanceISApaper_202.pdf
Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2012). Experimentalist Governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp.169-186). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI
Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (Eds.). (2010). Experimentalist governance in the European Union: Towards a new architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sielker, F. (2016). A stakeholder-based EU territorial cooperation: the example of European macro-regions. European Planning Studies, 24(11), 1995-2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1221383 DOI
Solly, A., & Berisha, E. (2021). Towards the Territorialisation of EU Cohesion Policy? The Case of EUSAIR. In E. Berisha, G., Cotella & A., Solly (Eds.). Governing Territorial Development in the Western Balkans (pp.333-355). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72124-4_16 DOI
Stead, D. (2014). European Integration and Spatial Rescaling in the Baltic Region: Soft Spaces, Soft Planning and Soft Security. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 680-693. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.772731 DOI
Trkulja, S., & Dabović, T. (2021). Supranational Frameworks for Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning in the Western Balkans. In E., Berisha, G., Cotella & A., Solly (Eds.). Governing Territorial Development in the Western Balkans (pp. 265-287). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72124-4_13 DOI
Zeitlin, J. (2018). EU experimentalist governance in times of crisis. In B., Laffan (Ed.). Europe's Union in Crisis (pp. 159-180). London: Routledge. DOI

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

49

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:247823 ; 1429-7132 (print) ; 2300-8547 (online) ; 10.7163/Eu21.2025.49.2

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Access:

Open

Object collections:

Last modified:

Jan 13, 2026

In our library since:

Dec 29, 2025

Number of object content downloads / hits:

55

All available object's versions:

https://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/publication/284491

Show description in RDF format:

RDF

Show description in RDFa format:

RDFa

Show description in OAI-PMH format:

OAI-PMH

Objects Similar

×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information