RCIN and OZwRCIN projects

Object

Title: Platform-attracting urban places – distribution and characteristics of ridesharing meeting points through a Hungarian case study

Creator:

Bálint, Dóra : Autor Affiliation ORCID ; Egyed, Ildikó : Autor Affiliation ORCID

Date issued/created:

2025

Resource type:

Text

Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 98 No. 4 (2025)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Abstract:

Accelerated technological change, particularly the rise of digital platforms, has fundamentally changed everyday activities such as mobility and consumption, with notable spatial implications, especially in urban areas. These platforms have become a prominent force in the transformation of space, giving rise to new academic fields of study, such as the sharing economy and, more recently, platform urbanism. In this paper, we offer an empirical snapshot of platform embeddedness in the urban space through a case study of a shared-use mobility platform in the Hungarian context. Using data from a ridesharing platform, we analyze the main characteristics and spatial distribution of locations that serve as meeting points within settlement borders. Our findings reveal a trend of spatial asymmetry, with meeting points predominantly located near main roads and highways – reflecting the utilitarian preferences of ridesharing participants. Furthermore, concentrations near city centers suggest a balance between functional proximity to major routes and symbolic or practical value tied to landmarks and accessibility. Notably, many of the most popular meeting points are located at hypermarkets, indicating that not only traditional transportation hubs, but also informal, non-transport-specific spaces, are being repurposed through platform use. Based on our results regarding where meeting points tend to emerge, we introduce the concept of ‘platform-attracting urban places’ to contribute to the conceptualization of the spatial impact of digital platforms on urban environments.

References:

Acquier, A., Daudigeos, T. & Pinkse, J. (2017). Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.006 DOI
Akbari, M., Foroudi, P., Khodayari, M., Fashami, R. Z. & Shahriari, E. (2022). Sharing your assets: A holistic review of sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 140, 604-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.027 DOI
Aloni, E. (2016). Pluralizing the sharing economy. Wash. L. Rev., 91, 1397. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/washlr91&div=38&id=&page=
Artioli, F. (2018). Digital platforms and cities: A literature review for urban research. SciencesPo, Institutional Repository (Spire).
Ash, J., Kitchin, R. & Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital turn, digital geographies?. Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516664800 DOI
Bálint, D. & Trócsányi, A. (2016). New ways of mobility: The birth of ridesharing. A case study from Hungary. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 65(4), 391-405. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.65.4.7 DOI
Bardhi, F. & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of consumer research, 39(4), 881-898. https://doi.org/10.1086/666376 DOI
Benoit, S., Baker, T. L., Bolton, R. N., Gruber, T. & Kandampully, J. (2017). A triadic framework for collaborative consumption (CC): Motives, activities and resources & capabilities of actors. Journal of Business Research, 79, 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.004 DOI
Boros, L., Dudás, G., Kovalcsik, T., Papp, S. & Vida, G. (2018). Airbnb in Budapest: Analysing spatial patterns and room of hotels and peer-to-peer accomodations. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 10(1), 26-38.
Dudás, G., Vida, G., Kovalcsik, T. & Boros, L. (2017). A socio-economic analysis of Airbnb in New York City. Regional Statistics, 7(1), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.15196/rs07108 DOI
Botsman, R. & Rogers, R. (2010). What's mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. Collins.
Bissell, D. (2020). Affective platform urbanism: Changing habits of digital on-demand consumption. Geoforum, 115, 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.06.026 DOI
Bork-Hüffer, T. & Yeoh, B. S. (2017). The geographies of difference in conflating digital and offline spaces of encounter: Migrant professionals' thrown togetherness in Singapore. Geoforum, 86, 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.002 DOI
Castellanos, S., Grant-Muller, S. & Wright, K. (2022). Technology, transport, and the sharing economy: Towards a working taxonomy for shared mobility. Transport Reviews, 42(3), 318-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1968976 DOI
Czioska, P., Mattfeld, D. C. & Sester, M. (2017). GIS-based identification and assessment of suitable meeting point locations for ride-sharing. Transportation Research Procedia, 22, 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.038 DOI
Celata, F. & Certoma, C. (2022). Digital platforms and socio-spatial justice in the (post-) pandemic city: Introduction to the special issue. Digital Geography and Society, 3, 100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100044 DOI
Celata, F. & Romano, A. (2022). Overtourism and online short-term rental platforms in Italian cities. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(5), 1020-1039. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003230618-5 DOI
Chan, N. K. (2022). Algorithmic precarity and metric power: Managing the affective measures and customers in the gig economy. Big Data & Society, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221133779 DOI
Chiappini, L. (2020). The urban digital platform: Instances from Milan and Amsterdam. Urban Planning, 5(4), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3417 DOI
Codagnone, C. & Martens, B. (2016). Scoping the sharing economy: Origins, definitions, impact and regulatory issues. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Digital Economy Working Paper, 1. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2783662 DOI
De Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022 DOI
Edelman, B. G. & Luca, M. (2014). Digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb. com. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper, 14-054. DOI
Dillahunt, T. R. & Malone, A. R. (2015). The promise of the sharing economy among disadvantaged communities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2285-2294). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702189 DOI
ENET. (2018, accessed 22nd January 2024). https://enet.hu/hirek/kozossegi-gazdasag-ujratoltve/
Friedman, G. (2014). Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2014.02.03 DOI
Furuhata, M., Dessouky, M., Ordóñez, F., Brunet, M. E., Wang, X. & Koenig, S. (2013). Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 57, 28-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2013.08.012 DOI
Gerwe, O. & Silva, R. (2020). Clarifying the sharing economy: Conceptualization, typology, antecedents, and effects. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(1), 65-96. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0010 DOI
Goldenberg, J. & Levy, M. (2009). Distance is not dead: Social interaction and geographical distance in the internet era. arXiv preprint arXiv:0906.3202. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0906.3202 DOI
Graham, M. (2013). Geography/internet: Ethereal alternate dimensions of cyberspace or grounded augmented realities?. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12009 DOI
Graham, M. (2020). Regulate, replicate, and resist - the conjunctural geographies of platform urbanism. Urban Geography, 41(3), 453-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1717028 DOI
Graham, M. & Zook, M. (2013). Augmented realities and uneven geographies: exploring the geolinguistic contours of the web. Environment and Planning A, 45(1), 77-99. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44674 DOI
Grassmuck, V. R. (2012). The sharing turn: Why we are generally nice and have a good chance to cooperate our way out of the mess we have gotten ourselves into. In Media, Knowldegde and Education:Cultures and Ethics of Sharing (pp. 17-34). https://doi.org/10.59350/p497m-bdx65 DOI
Han, S. Y., Tsou, M. H. & Clarke, K. C. (2018). Revisiting the death of geography in the era of Big Data: The friction of distance in cyberspace and real space. International Journal of Digital Earth, 11(5), 451-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2017.1330366 DOI
Henry, M., Schraven, D., Bocken, N., Frenken, K., Hekkert, M. & Kirchherr, J. (2021). The battle of the buzzwords: A comparative review of the circular economy and the sharing economy concepts. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 38, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.10.008 DOI
Hossain, M. (2020). Sharing economy: A comprehensive literature review. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102470 DOI
Johnston, H. (2020). Labour geographies of the platform economy: Understanding collective organizing strategies in the context of digitally mediated work. International Labour Review, 159(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12154 DOI
Kenney, M. & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61.
Kolonics, P. & Pónusz, M. (2020). A megosztásos gazdaság magyarországi helyzete (The Hungarian Status of the Sharing Economy). Multidiszciplináris Kihívások Sokszínű Válaszok, 2, 77-97.https://doi.org/10.33565/mksv.2020.02.05 DOI
Kumar, V., Lahiri, A. & Dogan, O. B. (2018). A strategic framework for a profitable business model in the sharing economy. Industrial Marketing Management. 69, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.021 DOI
Leszczynski, A. (2020). Glitchy vignettes of platform urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(2), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819878721 DOI
Lim, W. M. (2020). The sharing economy: A marketing perspective. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(3), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.06.007 DOI
McKenzie, G. (2020). Urban mobility in the sharing economy: A spatiotemporal comparison of shared mobility services. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 79, 101418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101418 DOI
Mericskay, B. (2019). Potentials and limits of (geo)digital footprints in mobility analysis: The example of the data from the BlaBlaCar carpooling platform. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.31990 DOI
Morales-Muñoz, K. & Roca, B. (2022). The spatiality of collective action and organization among platform workers in Spain and Chile. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(7), 1411-1431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x221103262 DOI
Morency, C. (2007). The ambivalence of ridesharing. Transportation 34(2), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-006-9101-9 DOI
Muñoz, P. & Cohen, B. (2017). Mapping out the sharing economy: A configurational approach to sharing business modeling. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.035 DOI
Nielsen, J. R., Hovmøller, H., Blyth, P. L. & Sovacool, B. K. (2015). Of "white crows" and "cash savers:" A qualitative study of travel behavior and perceptions of ridesharing in Denmark. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.033 DOI
Prieto, M., Stan, V. and Baltas, G. (2022). New insights in peer-to-peer carsharing and ridesharing participation intentions: Evidence from the "provider-user" perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102795 DOI
PWC (2016). Future of the sharing economy in Europe 2016. http://www.pwc.co.uk
Quattrone, G., Greatorex, A., Quercia, D., Capra, L. & Musolesi, M. (2018). Analyzing and predicting the spatial penetration of Airbnb in US cities. EPJ Data Science, 7(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0156-6 DOI
Richardson, L. (2020). Coordinating the city: Platforms as flexible spatial arrangements. Urban Geography, 41(3), 458-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1717027 DOI
Richardson, L. (2021). Coordinating office space: Digital technologies and the platformization of work. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 39(2), 347-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775820959677 DOI
Quattrone, G., Proserpio, D., Quercia, D., Capra, L. & Musolesi, M. (2016). Who benefits from the" sharing" economy of Airbnb?. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on world wide web (pp. 1385-1394). https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2874815 DOI
Scassa, T. (2017). Sharing data in the platform economy: A public interest argument for access to platform data. UBCL Rev., 50, 1017. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv5vdczv.9 DOI
Schaefers, T., Lawson, S. J. & Kukar-Kinney, M. (2016). How the burdens of ownership promote consumer usage of access-based services. Marketing Letters, 27, 569-577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9366-x DOI
Soltész, P. & Zilahy, G. (2020). A network theory approach to the sharing economy. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 28(1), 70-80. https://doi.org/10.3311/ppso.12597 DOI
Sutherland, W. & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 328-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004 DOI
Stiglic, M., Agatz, N., Savelsbergh, M. & Gradisar, M. (2015). The benefits of meeting points in ride-sharing systems. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 82, 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.07.025 DOI
Szabó, K. & Gupta, G. S. (2020). Growth of sharing economy in Hungary; Long distance car sharing: A case study of Oszkár. Review of European Studies, 12(9), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v12n3p9 DOI
Szpak, A., Gawłowski, R., Modrzyńska, J., Modrzyński, P. & Dahl, M. (2022). European sharing cities: New solutions for local economies and transport. In The Role of Cities in International Relations (pp. 183-228). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800884434.00013 DOI
Tafreshian, A., Masoud, N. & Yin, Y. (2020). Frontiers in service science: Ride matching for peer-to-peer ride sharing: A review and future directions. Service Science, 12(2-3), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2020.0258 DOI
Takhteyev, Y., Anatoliy, G. & Wellman, B. (2012). Geography of Twitter networks. Social Networks 34(1), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.006 DOI
Talandier, M., Duroudier, S., André-Poyaud, I., Chardonnel, S. & Ployon, E. (2024). The territorial impacts of BlaBlaCar carpooling: Between metropolitan polarization, intermediate cities' structuration, and rural services. Journal of Transport Geography, 121, 104041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104041 DOI
Tarek, M. O. R. & Amit, S. (2019). A closer look at the sharing economy, global ridesharing and ridesharing in Bangladesh. ULAB thought leadership article, Centre for Enterprise and Society.
Törnberg, P. & Söderström, O. (2025). Comparative platform urbanism: Cities in a world of platforms. Digital Geography and Society, 8, 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2025.100119 DOI

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

98

Issue:

4

Start page:

487

End page:

504

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:247615 ; 0016-7282 (print) ; 2300-7362 (online) ; 10.7163/GPol.0312

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Access:

Open

Object collections:

Last modified:

Dec 17, 2025

In our library since:

Dec 17, 2025

Number of object content downloads / hits:

66

All available object's versions:

https://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/publication/284359

Show description in RDF format:

RDF

Show description in RDFa format:

RDFa

Show description in OAI-PMH format:

OAI-PMH

×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information