Metadata language
Geographia Polonica Vol. 94 No. 3 (2021)
Creator:Ziółkowska-Weiss, Kamila : Autor ; Mróz, Franciszek : Autor
Publisher: Place of publishing: Date issued/created: Description: Subject and Keywords:nauczanie ; studenci ; Polska ; COVID-19 ; e-learning
Abstract:The main aim of the research was to answer the research questions: how the science went – studying Polish university students in the first weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and what were the main barriers to learning for Polish students during the COVID-19 pandemic. A survey method has been applied to collect empirical material among students. In the survey, CAWI (Computer-Assisted Web Interview) Internet questionnaire, sent via e-mail to students in the form of the invitation to the survey with a link to the survey, has been used in the survey. Research shows that the vast majority of the students felt anxiety, uncertainty about taking their maturity examinations, bachelor’s and master’s degree examinations and having the academic year credited on time. The main inhibitor preventing the respondents from learning at home during the ongoing pandemic was a lack of silence – quietness due to the noise of the siblings as well as remote work of the parents who had to perform their remote work during the students’ classes.
References:
Adamska, A. (2017). Efektywność e-nauczania z perspektyw szkoł wyższych. Edukacja Ekonomistów i Menadżerów, 44(2), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.3166
Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_3
Anderson, T., Annand, D., Wark, N. (2005). The search for learning community in learner-paced distance education programming, or 'Having your cake and eating it, too!'. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(2), 222-241. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1336
Asanov, I., Flores, F., McKenzie, D., Mensmann, M., Schulte, M. (2020). Remote-learning, time-use, and mental health of Ecuadorian high-school students during the COVID-19 quarantine. World Development, 138. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9252
Bayrakdar, S.,Guveli, A.(2020). Inequalities in home learning and schools' provision of distance teaching during school closure of COVID-19 lockdown in the UK. ISER Working Paper Series, No. 2020-09. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/227790
Bergman, J., Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
Bolumole, M. (2020). Student life in the age of COVID-19. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 1357-1361. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1825345
CBOS. (2009). www.cbos.pl.
Clark, R.E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053004445
Daniel, J.S. (1990). Distance education and developing countries. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/144272/
Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649609526919
Degago, A.T., Kaino, L.M. (2015). Towards student-centred conceptions of teaching: The case of four Ethiopian universities. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1020779
Department of Education, Skills and Employment. (2020). http://www.dese.gov.au/ [1 July 2020].
Długosz, P., Foryś, G. (2020). Zdalne nauczanie na Uniwersytecie Pedagogicznym im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie z perspektywy studentów i wykładowców. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Pedagogicznego.
Ellis, R., Ginns, P., Piggott, L. (2009). E-learning in higher education: Some key aspects and their relationship to approaches to study. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(3), 303-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360902839909
Giovannella, C. (2021). Effect induced by the COVID-19 pandemic on students' perception about technologies and distance learning. In Ó. Mealha, M. Rehm, T. Rebedea (Eds.), Ludic, Co-design and Tools Supporting Smart Learning Ecosystems and Smart Education. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 197. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7383-5_9
Grätz, M., Lipps, O. (2021). Large loss in studying time during the closure of schools in Switzerland in 2020. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 71, 100554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100554
Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2005). 'Distance education' and 'e-learning': Not the same thing. Higher Education, 49(4), 467-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-0040-0
Holmberg, B. (1989). Theory and practice of distance education. London: Routledge.
Holmes, B., Gardner, J. (2006). E-learning: Concepts and practice. London: SAGE.
Klichowski, M., Przybyła, M. (2013). Cyborgizacja edukacji - próba konceptualizacji. Studia Edukacyjne, 24, 143-153.
Komorowski, T. (2013). M learning - wykorzystanie urządzeń mobilnych w procesie kształcenia - stan bieżący, potencjał i bariery. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 32, 97-112.
Metcalf, D.S., De Marco, J.M. (2006). mLearning: Mobile learning and performance in the palm of your hand. Amherst: HRD Press.
Mielcarek, P., Parczewski, M., Madeyski, L. (2004). E-learning - analiza celów i możliwości ich realizacji na podstawie istniejących specyfikacji i standardów. Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, 30.
Mischke, J.M. (2009). Przeszkody, powody i utracone korzyści. E-nauczanie w polskich uczelniach wyższych. In M. Dąbrowski, M. Zając (Eds.), E-edukacja- analiza dokonań i perspektyw rozwoju (pp. 19-24). Warszawa: Fundacja Promocji i Akredytacji Kierunków Ekonomicznych.
Muilenburg, L.Y., Berge, Z.L. (2001). Barriers to distance education: A factor-analytic study. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527081
Phipps, R., Merisotis, J. (1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
Rozporządzenie Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego z dnia 25 września 2007 r. w sprawie warunków, jakie muszą być spełnione, aby zajęcia dydaktyczne na studiach mogły być prowadzone z wykorzystaniem metod i technik kształcenia na odległość, Dz.U. Nr 188, poz. 1347 z późn. zm.
Selim, H.M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
Singh, R.N., Hurley, D.C. (2017). The effectiveness of teaching-learning process in online education as perceived by university faculty and instructional technology professionals. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology. 6(1), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v6.n1.19528
Smith, S.B., Smith, S.J., Boone, R. (2000). Increasing access to teacher preparation: The effectiveness of traditional instructional methods in an online learning environment. Journal of Special Educational Technology, 15(2), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500204
Śleszyński, P. (2020). Prawidłowości przebiegu dyfuzji przestrzennej rejestrowanych zakażeń koronawirusem SARS-CoV-2 w Polsce w pierwszych 100 dniach epidemii. Czasopismo Geograficzne, 91(1-2), 5-18.
Urdan, T.A., Weggen, C.C. (2000). Corporate elearning: Exploring a new frontier. Report nr. 415.551.8600, WR Hambrecht + Co, Berwyn, Penn., March 2000.
Wößmann, L., Freundl, V., Grewenig, E., Lergetporer, P., Werner, K., Zierow, L. (2020). Bildung in der Coronakrise:Wie haben die Schulkinder die Zeit der Schulschliessungen verbracht, und welche Bildungsmassnahmen befürworten die Deutschen? Ifo-Schnelldienst, 73(09), 25-39.
0016-7282 (print) ; 2300-7362 (online) ; 10.7163/GPol.0212
Source:CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link
Language: Language of abstract: Rights:Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0
Terms of use:Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY 4.0 Międzynarodowe] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -
Digitizing institution:Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Original in: Projects co-financed by: Access: