Object structure
Title:

Lessons from the Danish-German Border Region for Post 2020 Interreg A – an Alignment with Cross-Border Functional Regions? .

Subtitle:

Europa XXI 39 (2020 )

Creator:

Klatt, Martin : Autor Affiliation ORCID ; Winkler, Ingo : Autor Affiliation ORCID

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Date issued/created:

2020

Description:

29 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Subject and Keywords:

cross-border cooperation ; INTERREG ; lobbyism ; territorial cooperation

Abstract:

Interreg has been the European Union (EU) initiative to support territorial cooperation and integration across borders. 30 years of Interreg, though, have not changed the fact that different barriers persist at the inner borders of the EU, and that only a few cross-border territories have emerged as joint action spaces with in-depth political cooperation and people’s interaction. While it is consensus that cross-border economic flows are decisive for the development of functional and in the end institutionalized cross-border regions, regional econometric models demonstrate the persistence of border barriers within the EU, but also that the removal of these barriers greatly increases regional growth potential. In a research project focusing on the alignment of cross-border regional economic interests, cross-border networks between business and politics and cross-border policies in the Danish-German cross-border region Sønderjylland-Schleswig we have discovered issues on different communication codes between business and politics, lack of tangible cross-border development strategies and a lack of alignment of shortterm, time delimited Interreg project oriented operational programs to tangible, long-term strategies of cross-border regional economic development. EU territorial cohesion policies could be better aligned with long-term, cross-border economic strategies to create sustainable cross-border development. It will be important to rethink Interreg in a less project-oriented, but more strategy-oriented direction; focusing on flows and institutional settings promoting the development of flows by reducing cross-border barriers.

References:

Andersen, D. J., & Sandberg, M. (2012). Introduction. In D. J., Andersen, M., Klatt & M., Sandberg (Eds.). The Border Multiple. The Practicing of Borders between Public Policy and Everyday Life in a Re-Scaling Europe (pp. 1-19). Farnham: Ashgate.
Andersen, D. J., & Winkler, I. (2020). Grænsearbejde blandt grænsependlere. Økonomi og Politik, 93(2), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.7146/okonomi-og-politik.v93i2.120951 DOI
Barten, U., Bröcker, J., Herrmann, H., & Klatt, M. (2006). Barrieren und Potentiale der grenzüberschreitenden Zusammenarbeit in der Fehmarnbelt Region. Kiel: Institut für Regionalforschung der Universität Kiel. Retrieved from https://www.re2.uni-kiel.de/de/archiv/forschung/beitraege-aus-dem-institut-fuer-regionalforschung/beitrag-41
Blatter, J. (2004). From 'spaces of place' to 'spaces of flow'? Territorial and functional governance in cross-border regions in Europe and North America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 530-548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00534.x DOI
Blatter, J., & Clement, N. (2000). Transborder Collaboration in Europe and North America: Explaining Similarities and Differences. In M., van der Velde & H., van Houtum (Eds.). Borders, Regions and People (pp. 85-103). London: Pion.
Blatter, J., Kreutzer, M., Rentl, M., & Thiele, J. (2008). The Foreign Relations of European Regions: Competences and Strategies. West European Politics, 31, 464-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380801939743 DOI
Brambilla, C. (2015). Exploring the Critical Potential of the Borderscapes Concept. Geopolitics, 20, 14-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2014.884561 DOI
Brunet-Jailly, E. (2005). Theorizing Borders: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Geopolitics, 10, 633-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318449 DOI
Bröcker, J., & Schneider, M. (2002). How Does Economic Development in Eastern Europe Affect Austria's Regions? A Multiregional General Equilibrium Framework. Journal of Regional Science, 42(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9787.00258 DOI
Buch, T., Dall Schmidt, T., & Niebuhr, A. (2009). Cross-border commuting in the Danish-German border region - integration, institutions and cross-border interaction. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 24(2), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2009.9695726 DOI
Castells, M. (1998). The Rise of the Network Society. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
Chilla, T., Altena, B., & Neufeld, M. (2016). Regionalentwicklung. Stuttgart: UTB.
Clement, N. C. (2004). Economic Forces Shaping the Borderlands. In V., Pavlakovich-Kochi, B. J., Morehouse & D., Wastl-Walther (Eds.). Challenged Borderlands. Transcending Political and Cultural Boundaries (pp. 41-62). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Commission, D.-G. T. (2015). Transport Infrastructure in the Jutland Corridor. Copenhagen: The Danish Ministry of Transport and Building.
Crescenzi, R., & Giua, M. (2020). One or many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the differential economic impacts of Cohesion Policy across member states. Regional Studies, 54, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1665174 DOI
DTBF (2020). Dansk-Tysk Business Forum. Retrieved from https://www.soenderjylland.dk/samarbejde/dansk-tysk-business-forum/
EC (2017). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament 'Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions'. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/cooperation/european-territorial/cross-border/review/#1
EC (2020). Interreg : European Territorial Co-operation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/cooperation/european-territorial/
EC (2020). New Cohesion Policy. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/2021_2027/
Eden, L. (2010). Letter from the Editor-in-Chief: JIBS Publication Criteria and Their Consequences. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1093-1098. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.33 DOI
Engl, A., & Evrard, E. (2020). Agenda-setting dynamics in the post-2020 cohesion policy reform: the pathway towards the European cross-border mechanism as possible policy change. Journal of European Integration, 42(7), 917-935. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1689969 DOI
Evrard, E. (2016). The European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC): Towards a Supraregional Scale of Governance in the Greater Region SaarLorLux? Geopolitics, 21(3), 513-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1104667 DOI
Gabbe, J., von Malchus, V., & Stumm, T. (2008). Cooperation Between European Border Regions. Reviews and Perspectives. Baden Baden: Nomos.
Guillermo Ramírez, M. (2018). The Added Value of European Territorial Cooperation. Drawing from Case Studies. In E., Medeiros (Ed.). European Territorial Cooperation. Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to the Process and Impacts of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Europe (pp. 25-47). Cham: Springer. DOI
Hall, P. (2008). Opportunities for Democracy in Cross-border Regions? Lessons from the Øresund Region. Regional Studies, 42(3), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701281592 DOI
IDD (2020). Interreg Deutschland-Dänemark. Retrieved from https://www.interreg5a.eu/
van Houtum, H., Kramsch, O., & Zierhofer, W. (Eds.). (2005). B/ordering Space. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Keating, M. (1998). The New Regionalism in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Keating, M. (1998). The new regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial restructuring and political change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Keating, M. (2004). Regions and Regionalism in Europe. Cheltenham, Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Keating, M. (2008). A Quarter Century of the Europe of the Regions. Regional & Federal Studies, 18(5), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560802351630 DOI
Klatt, M. (2006). Fra modspil til medspil?: grænseoverskridende samarbejde i Sønderjylland/Schleswig 1945-2005. Aabenraa: Institut for Grænseregionsforskning.
Klatt, M. (2008). Dansk international landevejstransport: en branche og dens forening i konstant udvikling. Sønderborg: Institut for Grænseregionsforskning.
Klatt, M. (2013). Transportbranchen. En vigtig del af Sønderjyllands erhvervshistorie. In H. S., Hansen, E., Vestergaard & T. A., Vestergaard (Eds.). Sønderjysk Erhvervshistorie 1800-2000 (pp. 187-206). Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Klatt, M. (2014). (Un)Familiarity? Labor Related Cross-Border Mobility in Sønderjylland/Schleswig since Denmark Joined the EC in 1973. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 29(3), 353-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2014.938968 DOI
Klatt, M. (2017). Dybbøl 2014. Constructing Familiarity by Remembrance? In E., Boesen & G., Schnuer (Eds.). European Borderlands. Living with Bridges and Barriers (pp. 30-46). Milton Park: Routledge.
Klatt, M. (2020). What has happened to our cross border regions? Corona, Unfamiliarity and transnational borderlander activism in the Danish German border region. In C., Wille & R., Kanesu (Eds.). Borders in Pandemic Times. Insights into the Covid-19 lockdown (pp. 43-47). Luxembourg/Trier: University of Luxemburg/Trier University.
Klatt, M., & Herrmann, H. (2011). Half Empty or Half Full? Over 30 Years of Regional Cross-Border Cooperation Within the EU: Experiences at the Dutch-German and Danish-German Border. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 26, 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2011.590289 DOI
Knippschild, R., & Vock, A. (2017). The conformance and performance principles in territorial cooperation: a critical reflection on the evaluation of INTERREG projects. Regional Studies, 51(11), 1735-1745. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1255323 DOI
Krätke, S. (1996). Where East meets West: The German-Polish border region in transformation. European Planning Studies, 4(6), 647-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319608720372 DOI
Kurowska-Pysz, J. (2016). Opportunities for Cross-Border Entrepreneurship Development in a Cluster Model Exemplified by the Polish-Czech Border Region. Sustainability, 8(3), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030230 DOI
Lambertz, K. H. (2011). L'état de la cooperation transfrontalière en Europe. In B., Wassenberg & J., Beck (Eds.). Living and researching cross-border cooperation: the European dimension (pp. 59-67). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Lange, E. (2018). Cross-border Cooperation in Action: Taking a Closer Look at the Galicia - North of Portugal European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 33(3), 415-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1195701 DOI
Leick, B. (2011). Barriers to co-operation and competitive advantage: crossborder business networks of Saxon and Northern Bohemian firms. Journal for East European Management Studies, 16(2), 162-184. https://doi.org/10.2307/23281854 DOI
Lundquist, K.-J., & Winther, L. (2006). The Interspace between Denmark and Sweden: The Industrial Dynamics of the Öresund Cross-Border Region. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 106(1), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2006.10649549 DOI
Löfgren, O. (2008). Regionauts: the Transformation of Cross-Border Regions in Scandinavia. European Urban and Regional Studies, 15(3), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776408090418 DOI
Martinez, O. J. (1994). Border People. Life and Society in the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands. Tucson/London: University of Arizona Press.
Medeiros, E. (2011). (Re)defining the Euroregion Concept. European Planning Studies, 19(1), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.531920 DOI
Medeiros, E. (2018). The Role of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) in EU Cohesion Policy. In E., Medeiros (Ed.). European Territorial Cooperation. Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to the Process and Impacts of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Europe (pp. 69-93). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_5 DOI
Medeiros, E. (2019). Spatial Planning, Territorial Development, and Territorial Impact Assessment. Journal of Planning Literature, 34(2), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219831375 DOI
Nehrt, L., Truitt, J., & Wright, R. W. (1970). International Business Research: Past, Present, Future. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Graduate School of Business. DOI
O'Dell, T. (2003). Øresund and the Regionauts. European Studies: A Journal of European Culture, History and Politics, 19, 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401201391_003 DOI
Ohmae, K. (1990). Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Global Marketplace. London: Harper Collins.
Paudel, U. R., & Devkota, N. (2018). Socio-economic influences on small business performance in Nepal-India open border: Evidence from cross-sectional analysis. Economics and Sociology, 11(4), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-4/1 DOI
Perkmann, M. (2007) Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: a comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 25(6), 861-879. https://doi.org/10.1068/c60m DOI
Perkmann, M., & Sum, N.-L. (2002). Globalization, Regionalization and Cross-Border Regions. Basingstoke/New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI
Pucher, J., Stumm, T., & Schneidewind, P. (2017). Easing legal and administrative obstacles in EU border regions. Brussels: European Commission.
Paasi, A. (2009). The resurgence of the 'region' and 'regional identity': theoretical perspectives and empirical observations on regional dynamics in Europe. Review of International Studies, 35, 121-146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008456 DOI
Reitel, B., Wassenberg, B., & Peyrony, J. (2018). The INTERREG Experience in Bridging European Territories. In E., Medeiros (Ed.). European Territorial Cooperation. Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to the Process and Impact of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Europe (pp. 7-24). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_2 DOI
RSS (2020). Region Sønderjylland-Schleswig. Retrieved from https://www.region.dk/region/dk/ueber_uns/region/DatenundFaktenRegionSjSl_dk.php
Rumford, C. (2008) Introduction: Citizens and Borderwork in Europe. Space and Polity, 12(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562570801969333 DOI
Schack, M., & Dall Schmidt, T. (2005). Grænseoverskridende erhvervsstrategi for Region Sønderjylland-Schleswig. Aabenraa: Institut for Grænseregionsforskning.
Schmidt, T. D., & Jensen, P. S. (2012). Social networks and regional recruitment of foreign labour: Firm recruitment methods and spatial sorting in Denmark. Papers in Regional Science, 91(4), 795-821. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00424.x DOI
Schmitt-Egner, P. (1998). 'Grenzüberschreitende Zusammenarbeit' in Europa als Gegenstand wissenschaftlicher Forschung und Strategie transnationaler Praxis. Anmerkungen zur Theorie, Empirie und Praxis des Transnationalen Regionalismus. In G., Brunn & P., Schmitt-Egner (Eds.). Grenzüberschreitende Zusammenarbeit in Europa. Theorie - Empirie - Praxis (pp. 27-77). Baden Baden: Nomos.
Schmitt-Egner, P. (2001). 'Transnationaler Regionalismus' als Gegenstand der Politikwissenschaft. In: J., Bellers & C., Rosenthal (Eds.). Die gesellschaftliche Basis von Aussenpolitik. Internationale Wirtschaft, Umwelt, Ideologien, Regional- und Entwicklungspolitik (pp. 386-441). Münster: Lit-Verlag.
Schrader, K., & Laaser, C.-F. (2020). Industrielle Strukturen und Potentiale im Norden: Eine regionale Analyse der deutsch-dänischen Industrielandschaft. Kieler Beiträte zur Wirtschaftspolitik. Kiel: Institut für Weltwirtschaft.
Scott, J. W. (2000). Euroregions, Governance, and Transborder Cooperation Within the EU. In M., van der Velde & H., van Houtum (Eds.). Borders, Regions and People (pp. 104-115). London: Pion.
Sohn, C. (2014). The Border as a Resource in the Global Urban Space: A Contribution to the Cross-Border Metropolis Hypothesis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1697-1711. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12071 DOI
Spierings, B., & van der Velde, M. (2013). Cross-Border Differences and Unfamiliarity: Shopping Mobility in the Dutch-German Rhine-Waal Euroregion. European Planning Studies, 21(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.716236 DOI
Spierings, B., & van der Velde, M. (2013). Cross-Border Mobility, Unfamiliarity and Development Policy in Europe. European Planning Studies, 21(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.716235 DOI
Svensson, S., & Balogh, P. (2018). Limits to Integration: Persisting Border Obstacles in the EU. In E., Medeiros (Ed.). European Territorial Cooperation. Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to the Process and Impacts of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Europe (pp. 115-134). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74887-0_7 DOI
Sønderjylland, U. (2020). Porten til Europa. Aabenraa: Udviklingsråd Sønderjylland.
Terlouw, K. (2012). Border Surfers and Euroregions: Unplanned Cross-Border Behaviour and Planned Territorial Structures of Cross-Border Governance. Planning Practice and Research, 27(3), 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.670939 DOI
Warleigh-Lack, A., Robinson, N., & Rosamond, B. (Eds.). (2011). New Regionalism and the European Union. Dialogues, comparisons and new research directions. London, New York, NY: Routledge. DOI
Wassenberg, B. (2016). La diplomatie territoriale. Encyclopédie pour une histoire nouvelle de l'Europe. Retrieved form https://ehne.fr/fr/node/12259
Wassenberg, B., Reitel, B., Rubio, J., & Peyrony, J. (2015). Territorial Cooperation in Europe. A Historical Perspective. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

38

Start page:

139

End page:

156

Resource type:

Text

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

1429-7132 ; 10.7163/Eu21.2020.38.5

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Operational Program Digital Poland, 2014-2020, Measure 2.3: Digital accessibility and usefulness of public sector information; funds from the European Regional Development Fund and national co-financing from the state budget.

Access:

Open

×

Citation

Citation style: