Metadata language
Title:
Subtitle:
Geographia Polonica Vol. 92 No. 3 (2019)
Creator:
Píša, Jan
:
Autor
;
Hruška, Vladan
:
Autor
Role:
Píša, Jan : Autor ; Hruška, Vladan : Autor
Publisher:
Place of publishing:
Date issued/created:
Description:
Subject and Keywords:
entrepreneurship ; in-migration ; rural space ; rural planning ; Czechia
Abstract:
References:
AKGÜN A.Y.A., BAYCAN-LEVENT T.N., NIJKAMP P., POOT J., 2011. Roles of local and newcomer entrepreneurs in rural development: A comparative meta-analytic study. Regional Studies, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1207-1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003792500
ATTERTON J., AFFLECK A., 2010. Rural businesses in the North East of England. Retrieved from https://www.ncl.ac.uk/media/wwwnclacuk/centreforruraleconomy/files/NE-rural-business.pdf [2 November 2018].
ATTERTON J., BRYDEN J., JOHNSON T.G., 2012. Rural economic transformation in the UK and US [in:] M. Shucksmith, D.L., Brown, S. Shortall, J., Verguns, M.E., Warner (eds.), Rural transformations and rural policies in the US and UK, London: Routlege, pp. 117-137.
BARTOŠ M., KUŠOVÁ D., TĚŠITEL J., NOVOTNÁ M., KOPP J., MAHÁČEK J., MOSS L.A.G., GLORIOSO R.S., 2011. Amenitní migrace do venkovských oblastí České republiky. Kostelec nad Černými lesy: Lesnická práce.
BENSON M., O'REILLY K., 2009. Migration and the search for a better way of life: A critical exploration of lifestyle migration. The Sociological Review, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 547-766. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01864.x
BERNARD J., 2006. Sociální integrace přistěhovalců z velkoměsta na vesnici v České republice a v Rakousku. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 741-760.
BOSWORTH G., ATTERTON J., 2012. Entrepreneurial in-migration and neoendogenous rural development. Rural Sociology, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 254-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00079.x
CARSON D.A., CARSON D.B., EIMERMANN M., 2017. International winter tourism entrepreneurs in northern Sweden: Understanding migration, lifestyle, and business motivations. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2017.1339503
ČERMÁK Z., NOVÁK J., OUŘEDNÍČEK M., 2011. Saldo migrace / Net migration [in:] M. Ouředníček, J. Temelová, L. Pospíšilová (eds.), Atlas sociálně prostorové diferenciace České republiky. Praha: Nakladatelství Karolinum, pp. 89-90.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION - AEIDL, 1996. The Cork Declaration: Rural Europe - Future Perspectives. European Conference on Rural Development, Cork (Ireland), November 7-9, 1996.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2003. EU research on social sciences and: The future of Europe's rural periphery, the role of entrepreneurship in responding to employment problems and social marginalization. Brussels: European Commission, http://cordis.europa.eu/docs/publications/1001/100124141-6_en.pdf [2 November 2018].
GKARTZIOS M., SCOTT M., 2014. Placing housing in rural development: Exogenous, endogenous and neo-endogenous approaches. Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 241-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12030
GOSNELL H., ABRAMS J., 2009. Amenity migration: diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal, vol. 76, no. 4., pp. 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-009-9295-4
GRAY J., 2000. The Common Agricultural Policy and the re-invention of the rural in the European Community. Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 30-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00130
HALLIDAY J., COOMBES M., 1995. In search of counterurbanisation: some evidence from Devon on the relationship between patterns of migration and motivation. Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 433-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(95)00032-1
HENDL J., 2005. Kvalitativní vý zkum: Zá kladní teorie, metody a aplikace. Praha: Portá l.
HERSLUND L., 2012. The rural creative class: Counterurbanisation and entrepreneurship in the Danish countryside. Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00560.x
HRUŠKA V., 2014. Diferenciace venkovského prostoru na příkladu Moravskoslezského kraje. [Dissertation thesis], Brno: Masarykova univerzita, Přírodovědecká fakulta.
HRUŠKA V., CZAPIEWSKI K., KOVÁCS Z., 2015. Rural economic development in the post-agricultural era: Policy recommendations. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, vol. 39, pp. 129-144. https://doi.org/10.7163/SOW.39.8
HUGO H., MORÉN-ALEGRET R., 2008. International migration to non-metropolitan areas of high income countries: Editorial introduction. Population, Space and Place, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 473-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.515
ILBERY B., BOWLER I., 1998. From agricultural productivism to post-productivism [in:] B. Ilbery (ed.), The geography of rural change, Essex: Longmann, pp. 57-84.
KALANTARIDIS C., 2010. In-migration, entrepreneurship and rural-urban interdependencies: The case of East Cleveland, North East England. Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 418-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.03.001
KOVÁCS Z., BOROS L., HEGEDŰS G., LADOS G., 2013. Returning people to the homeland: Tools and methods supporting remigrants in a European context [in]: T. Lang (ed.), Return migration in Central Europe: Current trends and an analysis of policies supporting returning migrants, Forum IfL 21, Leipzig: Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde, pp. 58-94.
KOVÁCS Z., CSACHOVÁ S., FERENC M., HRUŠKA V., KONOPSKI M., 2015. Development policies on rural peripheral areas in Visegrad countries: a comparative policy analysis. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, vol. 39, pp. 77-102. https://doi.org/10.7163/SOW.39.6
LAPPING M., 2006. Rural policy and planning [in:] P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P. Mooney (eds.), Handbook of rural studies, London: SAGE, pp. 104-122. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n7
LIGHT I., BHACHU P., KARAGEORGIS S., 2004. Migration networks and immigrant entrepreneurship [in:] I. Light, P. Bhachu (eds.), Immigration and entrepreneurship: Culture, capital, and ethnic networks, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, pp. 25-49. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203789056-2
MAYER H., HABERSETZER A., MEILI R., 2016. Rural-urban linkages and sustainable regional development: The role of entrepreneurs in linking peripheries and centers. Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 8, 745; https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080745
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, 2018. Rural Development Programme of the Czech Republic for the period 2014-2020, Version 6.2.
MOSELEY M.J., 2003. Rural development: Principles and practice. Thousand Oaks (California): Sage.
MURDOCH J., 1992. Representing the region: Welsh farmers and the British state [in:] T. Marsden, P. Lowe, S. Whatmore (eds.), Labour and Locality: uneven development in the labour process, London: David Fulton, pp. 160-181.
NEWBERY R., SIWALE J., HENLEY A., 2017. Rural entrepreneurship theory in the developing and developed world. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750316686232
NORTH D., SMALLBONE D., 2006. Developing entrepreneurship and enterprise in Europe's peripheral rural areas: Some issues facing policy-makers. European Planning Studies, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500339125
NOVOTNÁ M., 2013. Formy podnikání amentních migrantů na venkově [in:] K. Mičudová (ed.), Trendy v podnikání 2013, Plzeň: Západočeská univerzita v Plzni, 1st edn., 6 pp.
OUŘEDNÍČEK M., NOVÁK J., ŠIMON M., 2013. Současné změny migrační bilance nejmenších českých obcí [in:] Výroční konference České geografické společnosti. Nové výzvy pro geografii, Brno: Masarykova univerzita, pp. 246-255.
PĚLUCHA M., KVĚTOŇ V., 2017. The role of EU rural development policy in the neoproductivist agricultural paradigm. Regional Studies, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 1860-1870. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1282608
PÍŠA J., 2019. The lawn grew too quickly! Perception of rural idyll by Czech amenity migrants. GeoScape, vol. 12, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2019-0004
PŁAZIAK M., RACHWAŁ T., 2014. The role of entrepreneurship in regional development strategies (based on the Polish National Strategy of Regional Development 2010-2020). Europa XXI, vol. 26, pp. 97-110.
POSPĚCH P., 2014. Discursive no man's land: Analysing the discourse of the rural in the transitional Czech Republic. Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 34, pp. 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.006
RAY C., 2006. Neo-endogeneous development [in:] P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P. Mooney (eds.), Handbook of rural studies, London: Sage, pp. 278-292. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n19
ROWLEY T., 2003. The rural identity crisis. Rural Policy Research Institute, www.rupri.org.
SMALLBONE D., 2009. Fostering entrepreneurship in rural areas [in:] J. Potter, A.R. Hofer (eds.), Strengthening entrepreneurship and economic development in East Germany: Lessons from local approaches, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, pp. 161-187.
STOCKDALE A., 2006. Migration: Pre-requisite for rural economic regeneration? Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 354-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.11.001
STOCKDALE A., 2014. Unravelling the migration decision-making process: English early retirees moving to rural mid-Wales. Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 34, pp. 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.010
ŠIMON M., 2014. Exploring counterurbanisation in a post-socialist context: Case of the Czech Republic. Sociologi Ruralis, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 117-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00576.x
ŠIMON M., BERNARD J., 2016. Rural idyll without rural sociology? Changing features, functions and research of the Czech countryside. Eastern European Countryside, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1515/eec-2016-0003
VAN DER PLOEG J.D., RENTING H., BRUNORI G., KNICKEL K., MANNION J., MARSDEN T., ROEST K.D., SEVILLA-GUZMÁN E., VENTURA F., 2000. Rural devel opment: From practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00156
WOODS M., 2011. Rural. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844304
Relation:
Volume:
Issue:
Start page:
End page:
Resource type:
Detailed Resource Type:
Format:
Resource Identifier:
0016-7282 (print) ; 2300-7362 (online) ; 10.7163/GPol.0153
Source:
CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link
Language:
Language of abstract:
Rights:
Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license
Terms of use:
Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -
Digitizing institution:
Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences