TY - GEN A1 - Zaucha, Jacek. Autor PB - IGiPZ PAN N1 - 29 cm L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/72536/PDF/WA51_94769_r2018-t35_EuropaXXI-Zaucha.pdf M3 - Text VL - 35 CY - Warszawa J2 - Europa XXI 35 (2018) PY - 2018 EP - 131 SP - 127 T1 - Book Review: The Poverty of Territorialism. A Neo-Medieval View of Europe and European Planning UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/72536 ER - TY - GEN N1 - 29 cm N2 - Cross-border cooperation – as objective 3 of cohesion policy since the 2007-2013 programming period – plays a key role in promoting Europeanisation, which is especially important in case of Central Europe that is dominated by small national states. Target areas of cross-border cooperation are the NUTS 3 units located along the state borders. As project generation, decision making and implementation is overwhelmingly done on regional level, territorial governance structures are decisive from cross-border cooperation point of view. The paper focuses on two programmes – the Slovenia-Austria and the Hungary-Croatia – whose target areas are lacking large urban centres, middle-size and small towns make up the backbone of the settlement network. The involved countries are very diverse in regional governance structures. Austria is a federal state with strong regional governments. Croatia and Hungary are unitary states with limited capacities on regional level. Slovenia is, again, a unitary state that lacks medium level of government, therefore the local level is the carrier of cross-border cooperation. Aim of the paper is to identify how different systems of territorial governance are reflected in the implementation of the programme and the allocation of funding. After presenting the premises of cross-border cooperation and a brief outline of the two programmes a quantified analysis will be presented based on primary ex-post programme data of the 2007-2013 Slovenia-Austria and Hungary-Croatia cross-border cooperation programmes. Analysis is conducted on LAU 2 level in order to show how different categories of the settlement structure contribute in terms of cooperation activity and absorption and how it is distributed between different types of beneficiary organisations. L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/72535/PDF/WA51_94758_r2018-t35_EuropaXXI-Pamer.pdf M3 - Text J2 - Europa XXI 35 (2018) PY - 2018 EP - 126 KW - cohesion policy KW - territorial governance KW - cross-border cooperation KW - Central European countries A1 - Pámer, Zoltán. Autor PB - IGiPZ PAN VL - 35 CY - Warszawa SP - 111 T1 - How governance counts? Comparative analysis of activity and funding patterns of Central European cross-border cooperation programmes UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/72535 ER - TY - GEN N1 - 29 cm N2 - This research describes the evolution of the Irish spatial planning system and explores the impact of EU cohesion policies aiming to reduce regional and social disparities within the European Union with respect to recent developments in Ireland. The changing nature of the Irish planning system is seen as movement from a market or local development led approach towards a more strategic regional and national approach. This trend has in part been influenced by EU policies, directives and initiatives with evidence of both difficulties and successful delivery of some major projects. The discussion is complemented by evidence from two case studies in the transportation area and interviews with key participants in the policy processes. In conclusion the implications of such trends for future planning policy in Ireland and the EU are explored. L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/72534/PDF/WA51_94751_r2018-t35_EuropaXXI-Williams.pdf M3 - Text J2 - Europa XXI 35 (2018) PY - 2018 EP - 109 KW - EU KW - Ireland KW - spatial planning KW - transport infrastructure KW - peripheral regions A1 - Williams, Brendan. Autor A1 - Varghese, Johanna. Autor PB - IGiPZ PAN VL - 35 CY - Warszawa SP - 89 T1 - Examining the impact of EU cohesion policies aiming to reduce regional and social disparities with examples of policy impacts in Ireland UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/72534 ER - TY - GEN N1 - 29 cm N2 - The main objective of the paper is to present directions of mutual interrelationships between the state of spatial planning (at different levels of public administration) and effective cohesion policy, conceived as operational programmes carried out in Poland in the years 2004-2016. In the research study, the following results were attained: defining the basic planning conditions of development policies implementation resulting from integration with EU, indicating the consequences of these conditions for territorial governance and for the implementation of cohesion policy, as well as identifying the solutions adopted by Poland lying at the intersection between spatial development and investments financed by the EU funds. The paper presents the most important challenges, adopted solutions and effects of their utilization in Poland within three thematic issues: a) polycentricity and suburbanisation, b) transport infrastructure and accessibility and c) natural and cultural heritage. L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/72533/PDF/WA51_94748_r2018-t35_EuropaXXI-Komornicki.pdf M3 - Text J2 - Europa XXI 35 (2018) PY - 2018 EP - 87 KW - territorial governance KW - spatial planning KW - cohesion policy KW - Territorial Agenda 2020 A1 - Komornicki, Tomasz. Autor A1 - Szejgiec-Kolenda, Barbara. Autor A1 - Degórska, Bożena (1956– ). Autor A1 - Goch, Katarzyna. Autor A1 - Śleszyński, Przemysław. Autor A1 - Bednarek-Szczepańska, Maria. Autor A1 - Siłka, Piotr. Autor PB - IGiPZ PAN VL - 35 CY - Warszawa SP - 69 T1 - Spatial planning determinants of cohesion policy implementation in Polish regions UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/72533 ER - TY - GEN N1 - 29 cm N2 - For quite some while Luxembourg has seen an impressive socio-economic development, rendering spatial planning interesting. Although the spatial planning system in Luxembourg is relatively young, it is used to digest and to distribute the socio-economic growth and push for a more polycentric territorial structure. For this, policy makers have a range of instruments available. These include traditional but also many forward-thinking approaches, which give spatial planning in Luxembourg an innovative edge compared to other European countries. Among these forward-thinking approaches are e.g. national public participation processes, soft territorial cooperation or cross-border planning. Therefore, we argue in this article that supplementary to the traditional elements, spatial planning in Luxembourg has many innovative features, deserving more attention in the international planners’ community. Indeed, policy makers from all around Europe can learn and capitalise from the Luxembourgish experiences. L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/72532/PDF/WA51_94678_r2018-t35_EuropaXXI-Hans.pdf M3 - Text J2 - Europa XXI 35 (2018) PY - 2018 EP - 68 KW - spatial planning KW - governance KW - Luxembourg KW - growth KW - innovation KW - participation KW - cross-border planning A1 - Hans, Sebastian. Autor A1 - Böhme, Kai. Autor PB - IGiPZ PAN VL - 35 CY - Warszawa SP - 57 T1 - Planning in Luxembourg: innovation and tradition under one umbrella? UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/72532 ER - TY - GEN N1 - 29 cm N2 - The paper provides a short overview of the legal and institutional background of functional regions in Hungary, analyses the impact of EU cohesion policy and presents dilemmas concerning the management structures in territorial units crossing administrative borders. The Hungarian case demonstrates that although the need for a place based, territorially sensitive and integrated approach has become one of the most highlighted issues over the last decade, the overall impacts of EU cohesion policy on planning and development activities in functional regions have proved to be controversial. The paper partly relies on the case study of Central Hungary developed in the framework of the ESPON COMPASS project. - L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/72531/PDF/WA51_94579_r2018-t35_EuropaXXI-Perger.pdf M3 - Text J2 - Europa XXI 35 (2018) PY - 2018 EP - 55 KW - functional regions KW - EU cohesion policy KW - regional policy in Hungary KW - planning and management structures KW - Budapest Agglomeration KW - Lake Balaton Resort Area A1 - Perger, Éva. Autor PB - IGiPZ PAN VL - 35 CY - Warszawa SP - 37 T1 - Planning and development activities in functional regions – the Hungarian case UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/72531 ER - TY - GEN N1 - 29 cm N2 - In some European countries, sub-national regions are important geographical arenas for spatial planning. However, in Sweden, statutory regional planning is rather limited and the regional level is often described as having a weak position in the spatial planning system. In this article, we investigate territorial governance practices in two Swedish regions, with a focus on their interaction with the EU and the national level, and with the local level, as well as how these regions function as organisations and arenas for coordination of different policy fields. The study is based on semi-structured expert interviews and document analysis. The results show that spatial planning is practised both through statutory planning and soft planning approaches, and that these practices in different ways coordinate sectoral policies i.e. transport infrastructure and regional development. Both cases also illustrate difficulties not only of external coordination between different institutions and policy fields but also internally within organisations. It is also highlighted that spatial planning at the regional level focuses on coordinating actors and policy fields but that spatial planning is also an instrument to implement regional policies. In conclusion, it is argued that the organisation and territorial governance practices within a given institutional arrangement and the perception of spatial planning are crucial in determining how regions might function as multi-level coordination actors and policy arenas within spatial planning. L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/72530/PDF/WA51_94561_r2018-t35_EuropaXXI-Smas.pdf M3 - Text J2 - Europa XXI 35 (2018) PY - 2018 EP - 36 KW - multi-level coordination KW - policy fields KW - regions KW - spatial planning KW - territorial governance A1 - Smas, Lukas. Autor A1 - Lidmo, Johannes. Autor PB - IGiPZ PAN VL - 35 CY - Warszawa SP - 21 T1 - Organising regions: spatial planning and territorial governance practices in two Swedish regions UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/72530 ER - TY - GEN N1 - 29 cm N2 - Territorial governance is an extremely heterogeneous activity. Each European country is characterised by a complex system of legal acts, tools, discourses and practices that had consolidated through time, as a consequence of peculiar path-dependent processes. At the same time, since more than 30 years the European Union is developing territorially relevant actions and interventions, ultimately aiming at achieving the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the continent. The mutual relations entangling domestic and supranational territorial governance remain unclear: on the one hand, the European Union is required to produce a framework for delivering its policies that is flexible enough to accommodate domestic differences; on the other hand, domestic territorial governance and spatial planning systems should adapt in order to allow room for cross-fertilization with supranational interventions. This contribution builds on the evidence collected by the research project ESPON COMPASS to frame and explore this issue. In doing so, it serves as an introduction for this special issue that, in the following contributions, presents a number of concrete examples of interaction between EU spatial policies and domestic territorial governance and spatial planning. L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/72529/PDF/WA51_94531_r2018-t35_EuropaXXi-Cotella.pdf M3 - Text J2 - Europa XXI 35 (2018) PY - 2018 EP - 20 KW - EU cohesion policy KW - territorial governance KW - spatial planning KW - cross-fertilization KW - ESPON A1 - Cotella, Giancarlo. Autor PB - IGiPZ PAN VL - 35 CY - Warszawa SP - 5 T1 - Editorial: EU cohesion policy and domestic territorial governance. What chances for cross-fertilization? UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/72529 ER -