TY - GEN A2 - Klimek, Kazimierz (1934– ). Oprac. A2 - Kotarba, Adam (1938– ). Oprac. A2 - Obrębska-Starklowa, Barbara. Oprac. A2 - Starkel, Leszek (1931– ). Oprac. PB - IGiPZ PAN N1 - 136 pp., [12] k. tabl. : maps ; 21 cm N1 - Bibliogr. p. 119-121 N1 - Sum. eng, rus L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/28661/PDF/WA51_40003_r1969-z2-3_Dokumentacja-Geogr.pdf M3 - Text CY - Warszawa J2 - Dokumentacja Geograficzna 1969 z. 2/3 PY - 1969 KW - geographical environment KW - regional planning KW - Ropczyce county T1 - Analiza i ocena środowiska geograficznego powiatu ropczyckiego : dla potrzeb planowania regionalnego UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/28661 ER - TY - GEN A2 - Kondracki, Jerzy (1908–1998). Oprac. PB - IGiPZ PAN PB - Państwowe Wydaw. Naukowe N1 - 132 pp.; [6] k. tabl. : maps ; 24 cm N1 - [6] k. tabl. w kieszonce N1 - Sum. ger., rus. L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/17596/PDF/WA51_22034_r1959-nr19_Prace-Geogr.pdf M3 - Text CY - Warszawa J2 - Prace Geograficzne / Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Geografii ; nr 19 PY - 1959 KW - physical geography KW - geographical environment KW - Mrągowo county T1 - Z badań środowiska geograficznego w powiecie mrągowskim : opracowanie zbiorowe = Issledovaniâ geografičeskoj sredy mrongovskogo rajona UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/17596 ER - TY - GEN A2 - Starkel, Leszek (1931– ). Ed. PB - IGiPZ PAN PB - Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich - Wydaw. PAN N1 - 165 pp. : ill., maps ; 24 cm N1 - Bibliogr. p. [147]-151 N1 - Summ. eng., rus. L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/1347/PDF/Wa51_5419_r1978-nr125_Prace-Geogr.pdf M3 - Text CY - Wrocław [etc.] J2 - Prace Geograficzne = Geograficeskie Trudy = Geographical Studies / Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania, nr 125 PY - 1978 KW - geographic environment KW - typologies of geographic environment KW - climate KW - water circulation in soils KW - agricultural production KW - agricultural land use KW - Carpathians KW - Sandomierz Basin T1 - Studia nad typologią i oceną środowiska geograficznego Karpat i Kotliny Sandomierskiej : opracowanie zbiorowe = Issledovaniâ po tipologii i ocenke geografičeskoj sredy Karpat i Sandomirskoj kotloviny = Studies in the typology and geographic environment evaluation of the Carpathians and the Sandomierz Basin UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/1347 ER - TY - GEN N1 - 24 cm N2 - Comparative analysis was performed using the scales of ecological indicator values for plant species proposed by: (1) Ellenberg for the flora of Germany, (2) Landolt for the flora of Switzerland and (3) Zarzycki for the flora of Poland, in relation to six environmental features concerned with climate (i.e. light intensity [L], temperature [T] continentality [K]) and soil (moisture [F], acidity [R] and nitrogen content [N]). Species characteristic for deciduous forest of class Querco-Fagetea were used as the ”tool” in the comparison. Numbers of species differ – from 83 to 105 depending on environmental feature. It was assumed that pairs of ecological scales are similar if the percentage share of species is above 50% in corresponding degrees of scales. The main aim of the analysis is to determine if compared scales originating from different parts of Central Europe are similar (or distinct) in the ecological diagnosis (climatic and soil) diagnosis as expressed by the three indicator values (corresponding to the three scales) for each feature of the geographical environment. Results were interpreted in respect of two opposing hypotheses. The first of these assumes that the scales compared are similar, with the particular degrees conforming to the same ranges of actual measurements, while differences concern the assessment of the requirements of species as indicators of environmental conditions. The second, alternative hypothesis assumes that the scales are different (most often shifted by one degree), while the ecological requirements of the species are similar. The analysis of histograms of frequency of the particular species categories shows that support for the first of the two hypotheses is provided by the pairs of scales for: (1) light intensity [L] of Ellenberg and Zarzycki; (2) temperature [T] of Ellenberg and Landolt; (3) degree of continentality [K] of Landolt and Zarzycki; (4) moisture of the soil [F] of Ellenberg and Zarzycki; (5) acidity of the soil [R] of Ellenberg and Zarzycki; and (6) nitrogen content in the soil [N] of Ellenberg and Landolt. as regards the second hypothesis, the distribution of frequencies for species categories in the histograms allows for the explanation of differences (shifts) within the following pairs of scales compared: (1) temperature [T] of Ellenberg and Zarzycki; (2) climate continentality [K] of Ellenberg and Zarzycki, (3) soil acidity [R] of Ellenberg and Landolt, and of Landolt and Zarzycki; and (4) nitrogen content in the soil [N] of Landolt and Zarzycki. It is worth noting that similar results and conclusions were achieved when the same ecological scales of indicator values were compared, albeit on the basis of species from meadows in class Molinio-Arrhenathereta (Roo-Zielinska, 2004). This means that a total of c. 200 species (of meadow and deciduous forest) were evaluated. However it is only 10% of K Zarzycki list of Polish flora (Zarzycki et al., 2002), but ecological spectra and tolerance of both groups (with large number of species) are very different. The obtained results suggest a need to continue with such comparative analyses of European ecological scales for groups of characteristic species belonging to different phytosociological units, and to find proper ecological indicator values for the Polish flora and plant communities. L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/55588/PDF/WA51_75393_r2009-t81-z3_Przeg-Geogr-Roo-Ziel.pdf M3 - Text J2 - Przegląd Geograficzny T. 81 z. 3 (2009) PY - 2009 IS - 3 EP - 345 KW - ecological indicator values KW - characteristic plant species KW - physico-geographical environment KW - climate features KW - soil features A1 - Roo-Zielińska, Ewa (1948– ) PB - IGiPZ PAN VL - 81 CY - Warszawa SP - 317 T1 - Porównanie europejskich skal ekologicznych liczb wskaźnikowych w ocenie środowiska fizycznogeograficznego na podstawie charakterystycznych gatunków roślin lasów liściastych z klasy Querco-Fagetea = Comparison of European scales of ecological indicator values in assessing the natural environment on the basis of species characteristic for deciduous forest of class Querco-Fagetea UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/55588 ER - TY - GEN N1 - 24 cm N2 - Comparative analysis was performed in relation to the ecological scales of indicator values for plant species proposed by: (1) Ellenberg for the flora of Germany, (2) Landolt for the flora of Switzerland and (3) Zarzycki for the flora of Poland, in relation to six environmental features, i.e. the climatic features of light intensity [L], temperature [T] and continentality [K], and the edaphic features of moisture [F], acidity [R] and nitrogen content [N]. Characteristic species of heaths and poor grasslands from class Nardo-Callunetea were used asthe” tool” in the above comparison. Numbers of species involved ranged from 28 to 53, depending on the environmental features and compared scales involved. The assumption was that pairs of ecological scales were similar where the percentage share of species is above 50% in corresponding numbers along the scales. The main aim of the analysis was in turn to determine if compared scales originating from different parts of central Europe were similar (or distinct) in their ecological (climatic and edaphic) diagnoses, as expressed in terms of three indicator values (corresponding to three scales) for each relevant feature of the geographical environment. Results obtained were interpreted by reference to two opposing hypotheses. The first assumes that the scales compared are similar, with particular numbers along the scales conforming to the same ranges of actual measurements, while differences concern the assessment of the requirements of the species as indicators of environmental conditions. The second, alternative hypothesis assumes that the scales are different (most often shifted by one degree), while the ecological requirements of the species are similar. Analysis of histograms for frequencies of particular species categories shows that examples sustaining the first of the two hypotheses are provided by the pairs of scales of: (1) temperature [T] of Ellenberg and Landolt; (2) continentality (K) of Landolt and Zarzycki, (3) soil moisture [F] of Ellenberg and Zarzycki; (4) nitrogen content in the soil [N] of Ellenberg and Landolt. In relation to the second hypothesis, the distribution of frequencies of the species categories in the histograms allows for the explanation of differences (in terms of shifts) within the following pairs of scales compared: (1) temperature [T] of Landolt and Zarzycki; (2) soil moisture [F] of Landolt and Zarzycki; (3) soil moisture of Landolt and Zarzycki; (4) soil acidity of Landolt and Zarzycki; (5) nitrogen content in the soil [N] of Ellenberg and Zarzycki. It is worth noting that a similar analysis was achieved when the same ecological scales of indicator values were compared by reference to meadow species from class Molinio-Arrhenathereta (Roo-Zielinska, 2004), deciduous forest of class Querco-Fagetea (Roo-Zielińska, 2009), xerothermic grasslands of class Festuco-Brometea (Roo-Zielińska, 2012) and sandy xeric grasslands of class Koelerio glaucae-Corynephoretea canescentis class (Roo-Zielińska, 2015). This means that a total of some 460 species (of meadows, deciduous forests, xerothermic and sandy xeric grasslands, and heaths and poor grasslands) have now been evaluated. While this still only represents some 23% of K Zarzycki’s list of the Polish flora (Zarzycki et al., 2002), very different ecological spectra and tolerance in the five groups have not precluded the highlighting of certain regularities applying to the plant communities already studied. The results obtained point to the need for comparative analysis of European ecological scales for groups of characteristic species belonging to different phytosociological units/associations to be continued with, with ecological indicator values appropriate to Poland’s flora and plant communities then being found. L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/67598/PDF/WA51_87250_r2018-t90-z3_Przeg-Geogr-Roo-Ziel.pdf M3 - Text J2 - Przegląd Geograficzny T. 90 z. 3 (2018) PY - 2018 IS - 3 EP - 434 KW - scales of ecological indicator values KW - heaths KW - poor grasslands of class Nardo-Callunetea KW - characteristic plant species KW - physico-geographical environment A1 - Roo-Zielińska, Ewa (1948– ). Autor PB - IGiPZ PAN VL - 90 CY - Warszawa SP - 403 T1 - Porównanie europejskich skal ekologicznych liczb wskaźnikowych w ocenie środowiska fizycznogeograficznego na podstawie charakterystycznych gatunków roślin wrzosowisk i ubogich muraw bliźniczkowych z klasy Nardo‑Callunetea = A comparison of European scales of ecological indicator values in assessing the natural environment on the basis of species characteristic for heaths and poor grasslands of class Nardo‑Callunetea UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/67598 ER - TY - GEN N1 - 164 pp ; 24 cm L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/5493/PDF/Wa51_18159_r2012-t84-z1_Przeglad_Geograficzny-Roo-Zielinska.pdf M3 - Text J2 - Przegląd Geograficzny T. 84 z. 1 (2012) PY - 2012 IS - 1 EP - 51 KW - scales of ecological indicator values KW - xerothermic grasslands KW - charactristic species KW - physico-geographical environment KW - climate KW - soils A1 - Roo-Zielińska, Ewa (1948– ) PB - IGiPZ PAN VL - 84 CY - Warszawa SP - 23 T1 - Porównanie europejskich skal ekologicznych liczb wskaźnikowychw ocenie środowiska fizycznogeograficznego na podstawie charakterystycznychgatunków roślin muraw ciepłolubnych z klasy Festuco-Brometea = Comparison of European scales of ecological indicator values in assessingthe natural environment on the basis of species characteristic for xerothermicgrasslands of class Festuco-Brometea) UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/5493 ER - TY - GEN N1 - 24 cm N2 - Comparative analysis was performed in relation to the scales of ecological indicator values for plant species proposed by: (1) Ellenberg, for the flora of Germany, (2) Landolt for the flora of Switzerland and (3) Zarzycki for the flora of Poland – in relation to six environmental features classed as either “climatic”: light intensity [L], temperature [T] or continentality [K] or soil-related (edaphic), i.e. moisture [F], acidity [R] and nitrogen content [N]. Species characteristic of sandy xeric grasslands from Koelerio glaucaeCorynephoretea canescentis class were used as a ”tool” in the comparison. Numbers of species differ – from 55 to 62 - depending on environmental features and the compared scales. However, it was assumed that pairs of ecological scales were similar if the percentage share of species was above 50% in corresponding points on scales. The main aim of the analysis was to assess whether compared scales originating from different parts of Central Europe are similar (or different) in their ecological diagnosis as regards climatic and edaphic conditions, where each feature of the geographical environment is expressed in relation to three indicator values deriving from the three scales. The interpretation of results was based around two opposing hypotheses: that the scales compared are similar, with particular points along them conforming to the same ranges of actual measurements, while differences concern the assessment of the requirements of the species as indicators of environmental conditions; or that the scales are different (most often shifted by one degree), while the ecological requirements of the species are similar. The analysis of histograms of frequency for the particular species categories shows that examples supporting the fi rst of the two hypotheses are constituted by the pairs of scales for: (1) light intensity [L] of Ellenberg and Zarzycki, (2) temperature [T] of Ellenberg and Zarzycki; (3) soil moisture [F] of Ellenberg and Zarzycki; (4) nitrogen content in the soil [N] of Ellenberg and Landolt. In terms of the second hypothesis the distribution of frequencies of the species categories in the histograms allows for the explanation of the differences (shifts) within the compared pairs of scales concerning: (1) light [L] as expressed by Landolt or Zarzycki values; (2) continentality [K] of Ellenberg and Zarzycki; (3) soil moisture [F] of Ellenbeg and Landolt; (4) soil moisture of Landolt and Zarzycki; (5) soil acidity of Landolt and Zarzycki; (5) nitrogen content in the soil [N] of Ellenberg and Zarzycki. It is worth noting that similar results for analysis were obtained when the same ecological scales of indicator values were compared by reference to species from meadows of Molinio-Arrhenathereta class (Roo-Zielinska, 2004), deciduous forest of Querco-Fagetea class (Roo-Zielińska 2009) and xerothermic grasslands of Festuco-Brometea class (RooZielińska, 2012). This means that a total of around 380 species (of meadow, deciduous forest, xerothermic and sandy xeric grassland) have now been evaluated, though admittedly this is still only about 20% of K. Zarzycki’s list of Polish flora (Zarzycki et al., 2002). Nevertheless, the ecological spectra and tolerances found for the four groups are very different, with results obtained suggesting the need to continue with the comparative analysis of European ecological scales for groups of species characteristic of different phytosociological units/associations, with appropriate ecological indicator values for Polish flora and plant communities being found in the process. L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/56849/PDF/WA51_77378_r2015-t87-z3_Przeg-Geogr-Roo-Ziel.pdf M3 - Text J2 - Przegląd Geograficzny T. 87 z. 3 (2015) PY - 2015 IS - 3 EP - 438 KW - scales of ecological indicator values KW - sandy xeric grasslands KW - characteristic plant species KW - physico-geographical environment KW - climatic features KW - properties of soils A1 - Roo-Zielińska, Ewa (1948– ) PB - IGiPZ PAN VL - 87 CY - Warszawa SP - 409 T1 - Porównanie europejskich skal ekologicznych liczb wskaźnikowych w ocenie środowiska fizycznogeograficznego na podstawie charakterystycznych gatunków roślin muraw napiaskowych z klasy Koelerio glaucae-Corynephoretea canescentis = Comparison of European scales of ecological indicator values in the evaluation of a natural environment based on characteristic species of sandy, xeric grasslands of Koelerio glaucae-Corynephoretea canescentis class UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/56849 ER - TY - GEN PB - IGiPZ PAN N1 - 24 cm L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/14234/PDF/WA51_16350_r1972-t44-z1_Przeg-Geogr.pdf M3 - Text CY - Warszawa PY - 1972 KW - resources of geographical environment KW - graph theory KW - river valleys evolution KW - agriculture typology KW - pedological cartography KW - industrial dust KW - gypsy population KW - Zielona Góra voivodship T1 - Przegląd Geograficzny T. 44 z. 1 (1972) UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/14234 ER - TY - GEN PB - IGiPZ PAN N1 - 24 cm L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/8687/PDF/WA51_16379_r1969-t41-z2_Przeg-Geogr.pdf M3 - Text CY - Warszawa PY - 1969 KW - urban agglomerations KW - interregional flows KW - concentration measures KW - functional types of towns KW - geographical environment KW - regional planning KW - crop combination KW - ridge trenches KW - Poland KW - Moscow T1 - Przegląd Geograficzny T. 41 z. 2 (1969) UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/8687 ER - TY - GEN PB - IGiPZ PAN N1 - 24 cm L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/8693/PDF/WA51_16356_r1970-t42-z4_Przeg-Geogr.pdf M3 - Text CY - Warszawa PY - 1970 KW - man and environment KW - geographical environment KW - forecasting KW - geobotanical methods KW - recreation KW - sea fishery KW - hydrographic conditions KW - remote sensing KW - tourist capacity KW - cartographic method of research KW - classification of soils KW - Opolskie voivodeship KW - Włocławek county T1 - Przegląd Geograficzny T. 42 z. 4 (1970) UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/8693 ER - TY - GEN PB - IGiPZ PAN N1 - 24 cm L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/13259/PDF/WA51_16263_r1981-t53-z2_Przeg-Geogr.pdf M3 - Text CY - Warszawa PY - 1981 KW - theory of geography KW - natural rythms KW - cyclic processes KW - paradigms of geography KW - methodology of Regional Science KW - industrial geography KW - urban agglomerations KW - crude oil mining KW - geographical environment KW - Madrid agglomeration KW - Great Masurian Lake District T1 - Przegląd Geograficzny T. 53 z. 2 (1981) UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/13259 ER - TY - GEN PB - IGiPZ PAN N1 - 24 cm L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/14238/PDF/WA51_16353_r1971-t43-z3_Przeg-Geogr.pdf M3 - Text CY - Warszawa PY - 1971 KW - environmental protection KW - evaluation of geographical environment KW - physical geography KW - mathematical methods KW - regional development KW - regional planning KW - springs KW - thermal conditions of groundwater KW - water supply KW - fossil lakes KW - peat bogs KW - relief KW - deflation KW - Beskid Niski Mountains KW - Działy Grabowieckie KW - Poland KW - Lublin Upland T1 - Przegląd Geograficzny T. 43 z. 3 (1971) UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/14238 ER - TY - GEN PB - IGiPZ PAN N1 - 24 cm L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/8688/PDF/WA51_16378_r1969-t41-z3_Przeg-Geogr.pdf M3 - Text CY - Warszawa PY - 1969 KW - water balance KW - water economy KW - water resources KW - geomorphology KW - palaeohydrology KW - marginal zones KW - deglaciation KW - synthesis of regions KW - postglacial lakes KW - spatial planning KW - gypsy population KW - geographical environment KW - Gorzów Wielkopolski KW - Gardno-Łeba Lowland KW - Grajewo county KW - Vistula river valley KW - Świecie Plain KW - Volga delta T1 - Przegląd Geograficzny T. 41 z. 3 (1969) UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/8688 ER - TY - GEN PB - IGiPZ PAN N1 - 24 cm L1 - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/Content/14187/PDF/WA51_5107_r1979-t51-z4_Przeg-Geogr.pdf M3 - Text CY - Warszawa PY - 1979 KW - physical geography KW - theory of geography KW - Polish geography KW - complex physical geography KW - hydrology KW - spatial planning KW - management of environment KW - delimitation of physico-geographical units KW - saline karst KW - regionalization of vegetation KW - man and environment KW - evaluation of geographical environment KW - air temperature KW - maps of potential natural vegetation KW - climate KW - agriculture KW - sunshine duration KW - Upper Silesian Industrial Region KW - Carpathian Foreland KW - Poland T1 - Przegląd Geograficzny T. 51 z. 4 (1979) UR - http://www.rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/edition/14187 ER -