Object structure
Title:

No narrative so grand

Subtitle:

Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 69 (2017)

Creator:

Carver, Geoff ; Lang, Matthias

Publisher:

Instytut Archeolgoii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Place of publishing:

Kraków

Date issued/created:

2017

Description:

ill. ; 25 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Subject and Keywords:

visualization ; chronologies ; databases ; terminology ; archaeological metaphysics

Abstract:

Archaeology deals with many narratives, on a number of different levels. The most important is that of the narrative itself: archaeologists want to tell a story. Thus we frame our arguments within a narrative structure, with a beginning and an ending; we present our evidence and our conclusions, and link them all with arguments that are intended to show how the conclusions derive from the evidence. ; Archaeological narratives have long been concerned chronologies: the narration of events in the order that they occurred. To some degree this narrative benefi ted from one derived from geology, which equated time and space stratigraphically. The limitations of such approaches become obvious when we want to know more than just the sequence of events within the limited contexts of an individual site, and try to extrapolate those into regional analyses or those “universal laws of human behaviour” processualists claimed it was our task to uncover. ; Attempts at equating time and space are hindered to the extent that things cannot be related to one another in time as they are in space. In space things can be “near” one another, and we can model proximity in GIS. But how do we compare anything that is dated to around 350 AD, ca. 4th c. BC, “late Bronze Age,” etc.? “Free text” entry of the temporal “location” of an object, site or context does not suffi ce for modelling complex semantic structures in a database. ; This paper explores a solution for dealing with such problems of conceptualising and modelling temporal proximity.

References:

Adams M. 1992. Stratigraphy after Harris: Some Questions. In K. Steane (eds.), Interpretation of Stratigraphy: a Review of the Art; Proceedings of a Conference held on 18th June, 1992 at the City of Lincoln Archaeology Unit. Lincoln: City of Lincoln Archaeology Unit, 13-16.
Aristotle 1964. On the Soul; Parva Naturalia; On Breath (= Loeb Classical Library 2). London: William Heinemann.
Aristotle 2007. The Metaphysics (= Dover Philosophical Classics). Mineola, NY: Dover. Backhouse P. 2006. Drowning in data? Digital data in a British contracting unit. In T. L. Evans and P. T. Daly (eds.), Digital Archaeology: Bridging Method and Theory. London: Routledge, 50-58.
Bacon F. 2000. The New Organon. In L. Jardine and M. Silverthorne (eds.), The New Organon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 26-238.
Baines A. and Brophy K. 2006. What’s another word for thesaurus? Data standards and classifying the past. In T. L. Evans and P. T. Daly (eds.), Digital Archaeology: Bridging Method and Theory. London: Routledge, 236-250.
Barker P. 1998. Techniques of Archaeological Excavation. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
Berggren Å., Dell’Unto D. U., Forte M., Haddow S., Hodder I., Issavi J., Lercari N., Mazzucato C., Mickel A. and Taylor J. S. 2015. Revisiting refl exive archaeology at Çatalhöyük: integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel’s edge. Antiquity 89(344), 433-448.
Binford L. R. 1964. A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design. American Antiquity 29(4), 425-441.
Binford L. R. 2001. Constructing Frames of Reference: An Analytical Method for Archaeological Theory Building Using Hunter-Gatherer and Environmental Data Sets. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Blaise C. 2000. Time Lord: the Remarkable Canadian who Missed his Train and Changed the World. New York: Pantheon.
Bohrer F. N. 2011. Photography and Archaeology (= exposures). London: reaktion. Burke K. D. 1969. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bury J. B. 1920. The Idea of Progress; An Inquiry into its Origin and Growth. London: Macmillan and Co.
Callender C. 2002. Time, Reality & Experience (= Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carver G. 2010. Doku-porn: Visualising Stratigraphy. In S. Koerner and I. Russell (eds.), Unquiet Pasts; Risk Society, Lived Cultural Heritage, Re-designing Refl exivity. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 109-122.
Carver G. and Lang M. 2013. Reflections on the rocky road to E-Archaeology. In G. Earl, T. Sly, A. Chrysanthi, P. Murrieta-Flores, C. Papadopoulos, I. Romanowska and D. Wheatley (eds.), Archaeology in the Digital Era: Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Southampton, March 26-29, 2012. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 224-236.
Carver G., Lang M. and Türk H. 2013. Recent Developments in the ArcheoInf Project – Towards an Ontology of Archaeology. In F. Contreras, M. Farjas and F. J. Melero (eds.), Fusion of Cultures. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, Granada, Spain, April 2010. Oxford: Archaeopress, 581-584.
Carver M. O. H. 1990. Digging for data: archaeological approaches to data defi nition, acquisition and analysis. In R. Francovich and D. Manacorda (eds.), Lo Scavo archeologico: dalla diagnosi all’edizione: III Ciclo di lezioni sulla ricerca applicata in archeologia. Firenze: All’insegna del giglio, 45-120.
Clarke D. L. 1973. Archaeology: the Loss of Innocence. Antiquity 47(185), 6-18.
Clarke D. L. 1978. Analytical Archaeology. 2nd ed. London: Methuen & Co.
Collingwood R. G. 1927. Oswald Spengler and the Theory of Historical Cycles. Antiquity 1(3), 311–325.
Collingwood R. G. 1927. The Theory of Historical Cycles. II. Cycles and Progress. Antiquity 1(4), 435–446.
Collis J. 2001. Digging up the Past; An Introduction to Archaeological Excavation. Stroud: Sutton. Colt Hoare R. 1812. The Ancient History of Wiltshire 1. London: William Miller
Conolly J. 2000. Çatalhöyük and the Archaeological ‘Object’. In I. Hodder (ed.), Towards refl exive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük. Series edited by C. Scarre, Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 51-56.
Deutscher G. 2011. Through the Language Glass: Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages. London: Arrow.
Dibble H. L. and McPherron S. P. 1997. The Making of Combe-Capelle on CD-ROM. Journal of Field Archaeology 24(1), 59-66.
Eliade M. 2005. The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History. 2nd paperback ed. (= Bollingen Series). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Feyerabend P. 1993. Against Method. 3rd ed. London: Verso.
Flannery K. V. 1982. The Golden Marshalltown: A Parable for the Archeology of the 1980s. American Anthropologist 84(2), 265-278.
Foucault M. 1983. This is not a Pipe: with illustrations and letters by Rene Magritte (= Quantum Books). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Frank L. 1989. Reading the Gravel Page: Lyell, Darwin, and Conan Doyle. Nineteenth-Century Literature 44(3), 364-387.
Freud S. 1930. Das Unbehagen in der Kultur 14. Wien: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag, 419-506.
Geertz C. 1993. Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. In C. Geertz (ed.), The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Fontana Press, 3–30.
Gould S. J. 1978. Uniformity and Catastrophe. In S. J. Gould (ed.), Ever Since Darwin: Refl ections in Natural History. London: Burnett Books, 147-152.
Gould S. J. 1987. Time‘s Arrow, Time‘s Cycle: Myth and Metaphor in the Discovery of Geological Time. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Green C. T. 2009. Winding Dali’s Clock: The Construction of a Fuzzy Temporal-GIS for Archaeology. Leicester: University of Leicester.
Grenon P. and Smith B. 2004. SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology. Spatial Cognition and Computation 4(1), 69-103.
Hamilton C. 2000. Faultlines: the Construction of Archaeological Knowledge at Çatalhöyük. In I. Hodder (ed.), Towards refl exive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük. Series edited by C. Scarre. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 119-127.
Harkness J. 1983. Translator‘s Introduction. In M. Foucault, This is not a Pipe: with illustrations and letters by Rene Magritte. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1-12.
Harris E. C. 1989. Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press.
Hart C. 1963. A Concordance to Finnegans Wake. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hodder I. 1989. This Is Not an Article About Material Culture as Text. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8(3), 250-269.
Hodder I. 1992. Towards radical doubt: a dialogue. In I. Hodder (ed.), Theory and Practice in Archaeology. London: Routledge, 155-159.
Hodder I. 1997. ‚Always momentary, fl uid and fl exible‘: towards a refl exive excavation methodology. Antiquity 71, 691-700.
Hodder I. 1999. The Archaeological Process: an Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hodder I. 2000. Developing a Refl exive Method in Archaeology. In I. Hodder (ed.), Towards refl exive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük. Series edited by C. Scarre. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 3-14.
Hodder I. 2000. Towards refl exive method in archaeology the example at Çatalhöyük (= McDonald Institute monographs: BIAA monograph: Monograph (British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara)). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge. Distributed by Oxbow Books.
Holtorf C. 2000. Making sense of the past beyond analogies. In A. Gramsch (ed.), Vergleichen als archäologische Methode: Analogien in den Archäologien; Mit Beiträgen einer Tagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Theorie (T-AG) und einer Kommentierten Bibliographie (= British Archaeological Reports. International Series 825). Oxford: Archaeopress, 165-175.
Howe D., Costanzo M., Fey P., Gojobori T., Hannick L., Hide W., Hill D. P., Kania R., Mary Schaeffer, St Pierre S., Twigger S., White O., and Rhee S. Y. 2008. The future of biocuration. Nature 455(7209), 47-50.
Jardine L. 2000. Introduction. In F. Bacon, The New Organon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, vii-xxviii.
Journet D. 1993. Deconstructing “The Spandrels of San Marco”. In J. Selzer (ed.), Understanding Scientifi c Prose. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 232-255.
Joyce J. 1976. Finnegans Wake. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Kemmers F. and Myrberg N. 2011. Rethinking numismatics. The archaeology of coins. Archaeological Dialogues 18(1), 87-108.
Kobiałka D. 2014. Against Gandalf the Grey: towards a Sherlockian Reading of the History of Archaeological Thought. Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 66, 417-447.
Kuhn T. S. 1996. The Structure of Scientifi c Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lang M., Carver G. and Printz S. 2013. Standardised Vocabulary in Archaeological Databases. In G. Earl, T. Sly, A. Chrysanthi, P. Murrieta-Flores, C. Papadopoulos, I. Romanowska and D. Wheatley (eds.), Archaeology in the Digital Era: Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Southampton, March 26-29, 2012. 2. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 468-473.
Larsson S. 2004. Digging for dirt in Sweden: an historical explanation for the longevity of arbitrary excavation methods in Swedish urban archaeology. In G. Carver (ed.), Digging in the Dirt: Excavation in a New Millennium. Oxford: John and Erica Hedges, 153-160.
Le Poidevin R. 2007. The Images of Time: An Essay on Temporal Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lucas G. 2005. The Archaeology of Time (= Themes in archaeology). London: Routledge. Lyell C. 1990. Principles of Geology 1. Facsimile of 1st ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lyman R. L. and O’Brien M. J. 2006. Measuring Time with Artifacts: A History of Methods in American Archaeology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Lyne J. 1993. Angels in the Architecture: A Burkean Inventional Perspective on “Spandrels”. In J. Selzer (ed.), Understanding Scientifi c Prose. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 144-157.
Lévi-Strauss C. 1966. The Savage Mind (= The Nature of Human Society Series). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McAnany P. A. and Hodder I. 2009. Thinking about stratigraphic sequence in social terms. Archaeological Dialogues 16(1), 1-22.
McLuhan M. 2002. The Mechanical Bride: Folklore of Industrial Man. Corte Madera, CA: Gingko Press.
McLuhan M. 2003. Art as Survival in the Electronic Age (1973). In S. McLuhan and D. Staines (eds.), Understanding Me: Lectures and Interviews. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 207-224.
McLuhan M. 2003. Cybernetics and Human Culture (1964). In S. McLuhan and D. Staines (eds.), Understanding Me: Lectures and Interviews. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 44-55.
McLuhan M. 2003. The Future of Man in the Electric Age (1965). In S. McLuhan and D. Staines (eds.), Understanding Me: Lectures and Interviews. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 57-75.
McLuhan M. 2003. Living at the Speed of Light (1974). In S. McLuhan and D. Staines (eds.), Understanding Me: Lectures and Interviews. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 226-243.
McTaggart J. E. 1908. The Unreality of Time. Mind 17(68), 457-474.
Merton R. K. 1993. On the Shoulders of Giants: A Shandean Postscript. Post-Italianate ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mill J. S. 1882. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive; Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientifi c Investigation. 8th ed. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Molyneaux B. L. 1997. Introduction: the cultural life of images. In B. L. Molyneaux, The Cultural Life of Images: Visual Representation in Archaeology. London: Routledge, 1-10.
Mägi M. 2004. Changing trends in the study of Estonian Iron Age cemeteries: Archaeological excavation in archives. In G. Carver (eds.), Digging in the Dirt: Excavation in a New Millennium. Oxford: John and Erica Hedges, 13-18.
Papaconstantinou D. 2006. Deconstructing Context: A Critical Approach to Archaeological Practice. Oxford: Oxbow.
Petrie W. M. F. 1904. Methods and Aims in Archaeology. London: Macmillan and Co. Pettigrew T. J. 1848. Introductory address. Transactions of the British Archaeological Association 1-15.
Richards J. D., Winters J. and Charno M. 2011. Making the LEAP: Linking Electronic Archives and Publications. In E. Jerem, F. Redö and V. Szeverényi (eds.), On the Road to Reconstructing the Past. CAA 2008: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 36th Conference, Budapest, April 2-6, 2008. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 141-146.
Rudwick M. J. S. 1975. Caricature as a Source for the History of Science: De la Beche’s Anti-Lyellian Sketches of 1831. Isis 66(4), 534-560.
Rudwick M. J. S. 1976. The Emergence of a Visual Language for Geological Science 1760-1840. History of Science 14, 149-195.
Ryle G. 1971. Thinking and Language. In G. Ryle, Collected papers 2: Collected Essays 1929-1968. London: Hutchinson, 258-271.
Ryle G. 1971. The Thinking of Thoughts; What is ‘Le Penseur’ Doing? In G. Ryle, Collected papers 2: Collected Essays 1929-1968. London: Hutchinson, 480-496.
Saunders T. 2004. Breaking up time: the problems of ‘Phasing Stratigraphy’. In G. Carver (ed.), Digging in the Dirt: Excavation in a New Millennium. Oxford: John and Erica Hedges, 163-171.
Savitt S. F. 2002. On Absolute Becoming and the Myth of Passage. In C. Callender (ed.), Time, Reality & Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153-167.
Selzer J. 1993. Introduction. In J. Selzer, Understanding Scientifi c Prose. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 3-19.
Shanks M. 1997. Photography and archeology. In B. L. Molyneaux (ed.), The Cultural Life of Images: Visual Representation in Archaeology. London: Routledge, 73-107.
Shanks M. and Tilley C. Y. 1987. Re-constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice (= New studies in archaeology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Snow D. R., Gahegan M., Giles C. L., Hirth K. G., Milner G. R., Mitra P. and Wang, J. Z. 2006. Cybertools and Archaeology. Science 311(210), 958-959.
Stein J. K. 1986. Coring Archaeological Sites. American Antiquity 51(3), 505-527.
Stevanovic M. 2000. Visualizing and Vocalizing the Archaeological Archival Record: Narrative vs Image. In I. Hodder (ed.), Towards refl exive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük. Series edited by C. Scarre. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 235-238.
Taylor W. W. 1948. A Study of Archeology 3(2) (= Memoir Series of the American Anthropological Association 50). American Anthropological Association.
Tilley C. Y. 1990. Michel Foucault: Towards an Archaeology of Archaeology. In C. Y. Tilley (ed.), Reading Material Culture: Structuralism, Hermeneutics, and Post-structuralism. Oxford: B. Blackwell, 281-347.
Tucker J. 2005. Nature Exposed: Photography as Eyewitness in Victorian Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Tufte E. R. 1990. Envisioning Information. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press.
Van Riper A. B. 1993. Men Among the Mammoths: Victorian Science and the Discovery of Human Prehistory (= Science and its Conceptual Foundations). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Webster G. 1963. Practical Archaeology: An Introduction to Archaeological Field-work and Excavation. London: Adam & Charles Black.
Wheeler R. E. M. 1954. Archaeology from the Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willey G. R. and Phillips P. 1958. Method and theory in American Archaeology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Woodbury R. B. 1954. [Review of] A Study of Archeology by Walter W. Taylor. American Antiquity 19(3), 292-296.
Woolley L. 1961. Digging up the Past. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Wordsworth W. 1994. Roman Antiquities discovered at Bishopstone, Herefordshire. The Collected Poems of William Wordsworth. Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth, 275.

Relation:

Sprawozdania Archeologiczne

Volume:

69

Start page:

9

End page:

31

Resource type:

Text

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

0081-3834 ; 10.23858/SA69.2017.001

Source:

IAiE PAN, call no. P 244 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 245 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 243 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Library of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Projects co-financed by:

Ministry of Science and Higher Education ; Activities popularizing science (DUN)

Access:

Open

×

Citation

Citation style: