Search for: [Abstract = %22The aim of this article is to rethink and simultaneously to enrich previous reflections about contexts and consequences of the literary%2C textual and interpretive turn%2C which took place in the history of socio%5C-cultural anthropology re%5C-oriented to the literary science and philological imagination. The text reconsid ers the %E2%80%98writing culture%E2%80%99 movement seen from the perspective of more than three decades%2C focusing on three aspects. Firstly%2C this is the so%5C-called new sensitivity which continuation we can observe presently in the so%5C-called new humanities%2C in the post%5C-independence%2C postcolonial studies%2C as well as engaged anthropology and action research. Secondly%2C presenting the consequences of the emergence of literary imagination in the anthropology at the level of epistemology and theory%2C the text is calls for defining the discipline as a humanity in action. Thirdly%2C the text presents the influence of the %E2%80%98writing culture%E2%80%99 movement on remodelling research practices embedded in the empirical methods of qualitative research. Undertaking her reflections in the context of the crisis of socio%5C-cultural anthropology launched at the turn of the 1960s and 70s%2C the author shows its political and social contexts. The significant aspect is that so%5C-called experimental moment in anthropology has not been limited only to focusing by anthropologists on %E2%80%98literary undertaking%E2%80%99%2C but it has been a part of a permanent legacy of the discipline which has contributed to its critical self%5C-reflection.%22]

Number of results: 0