@misc{Ingarden_Krzysztof_Nowoczesność_2022,
 author={Ingarden, Krzysztof},
 volume={20},
 copyright={Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license},
 address={Kraków},
 journal={Journal of Urban Ethnology},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2022},
 publisher={Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk},
 language={pol},
 abstract={The prominent architect Arata Isozaki claims Japanese architecture can only be understood as a mediation process between modernization and tradition. The article aims to present the conditions of this process in the development of Japanese architecture, as well as urban planning ideas proposed by selected Japanese architects active after World War II. The first generation of post-war Japanese architects favored the acceptance of a neutral and ahistoric inter-national style; however, this stylistic was supplemented with threads of Japanese tradition. The following years were an attempt to assimilate Western ideas of postmodernism, which were also reflected in the mirror of the Japanese tradition. The generation of the globalization era rejected the language of postmodernism and, searching for its own creative path, often found inspiration in the native tradition. Each generation adapted external patterns to the nature of its own building and cultural tradition, which is illustrated by examples of the work of three architects: Kenzō Tange, Arata Isozaki and Kengo Kuma.},
 type={Text},
 title={Nowoczesność i tradycja w architekturze współczesnej Japonii. Trzy przykłady postaw twórczych: Kenzō Tange, Arata Isozaki, Kengo Kuma},
 URL={http://www.rcin.org.pl/iae/Content/238496/274775.pdf},
 keywords={Japanese architecture, urbanism, Kenzō Tange, Arata Isozaki, Kengo Kuma},
}