Object

Title: he transport and economic development debate in Poland and the United Kingdom: a review from 1960 to the present = Debata nt. transportu i rozwoju ekonomicznego w Polsce i Zjednoczonym Królestwie: przegląd dokonań od 1960 r. do współczesności

Date issued/created:

2013

Resource Type:

Article

Subtitle:

Przegląd Geograficzny T. 85 z. 4 (2013)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

References:

1. Alternative Transport Policy in Poland – Instruments of the Sustainable Transportation Policy Implementation, 1998a, Information Package No. 4, Institute for Sustainable Development, Warsaw. ; 2. Alternative Transport Policy in Poland – Options for the Development of the Transportation System in Poland, 1998b, Information Package No. 3, Institute for Sustainable Development, Warsaw. ; 3. Banister D., 2012, Transport and economic development: reviewing the evidence, Transport Reviews, 32, 1, pp. 1–2. ; - ; 4. Bhasin A., 2007, The Economic Benefits of Crossrail, Colin Buchanan & Partners, & Volterra Consulting, London. ; 5. Botham R., 1983, The road programme and regional development: The problem of the counterfactual, [in:] Button K.J., Gillingwater D. (eds.), Transport, Location and Spatial Policy, Gower Press, Aldershot, pp. 57–81. ; 6. Bröcker J., Meyer R., Schneekloth N., Schürmann C., Spiekermann K., Wegener M., 2004, Modelling the Socio-economic and Spatial Impacts of EU Transport Policy, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel/Institut für Raumplanung, Universität Dortmund, Kiel/Dortmund; www.inro.tno.nl/iason (4.11.2004). ; 7. Brulhart M., 2009, Is the new economic geography passé?, Vox-EU.org, 7 January 2009; http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/2759 (28.05.2012). ; 8. Bujnowski M., 2006, Dostępność transportowa jako czynnik konkurencyjności regionów wschodniego pogranicza Unii Europejskiej, [in:] E. Teichman (ed.), Wschodnie pogranicze rozszerzonej Unii Europejskiej: czynnik konkurencyjności, Szkoła Główna Handlowa, Warszawa. ; 9. DfT, 1999, Transport and the economy: Government response to SACTRA report, Department for Transport, London; www.dft.gov.uk (14.01.2005). ; 10. DfT, 2005a, SCGE models: Relevance and accessibility for use in the UK, Department for Transport, London; www.dft.gov.uk (13.01.2006). ; 11. DfT, 2005b, Transport, Wider Economic Benefits, and Impact on GDP, Department for Transport, London; www.dft.gov.uk (13.01.2006). ; 12. Dodgson J., 1974, Motorway investment, industrial transport costs and sub-regional growth: a case study of the M62, Regional Studies, 8, 1, pp. 75–91. ; - ; 13. Dodgson J.S., 1999, Framework for Assessing Studies of the Impact of Transport Infrastructure Projects on Economic Activity, Department of Environment Transport and the Regions, London; www.dft.gov.uk (14.01.2005). ; 14. Domańska A., 2006, Wpływ infrastruktury transportu drogowego na rozwój regionalny (The influence of road transport infrastructure on regional development), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa. ; 15. ESPON, 2006, Enlargement of the European Union and the Wider European Perspective as regards its Polycentric Spatial Structure, Final Report of ESPON project 1.1.3, August 2006, European Spatial Planning Observation Network (ESPON). ; 16. ESPON, 2011, TRACC: Transport Accessibility at Regional/Local Scale and Patterns in Europe, Interim Report, Version 21/02/2011, European Spatial Planning Observation Network (ESPON). ; 17. Feldman O., Nicoll J., Simmonds D., Sinclair C., Skinner A., 2008, Use of integrated transportation land use models in the wider economic benefits calculations of transport schemes, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2076, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA. ; 18. Fingleton B., Fischer M., 2010, Neoclassical theory versus new economic geography: competing explanations of cross-regional variation in economic development, Annals of Regional Science, 44, pp. 467–491. ; - ; 19. Fujita M., Krugman P., Venables A.J., 1999, The Spatial Economy. Cities, Regions, and International Trade, MIT Press, Cambridge. ; 20. Gibbons S., Machin S., 2003, Employment and Rail Access: Evaluation of the Wider Benefits of Transport Improvements, Department for Transport, London; www.dft.gov.uk (13.01.06). ; 21. Graham D.J., 2005, Wider Economic Benefits of Transport Improvements: Link between Agglomeration and Productivity, Stage 1 Report, Department for Transport, London; ; 22. Graham D.J., 2007, Agglomeration, productivity and transport investment, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 41, 3, pp. 317–343. ; 23. Gunn H.F., 2004, SCGE Models: Relevance and Accessibility for use in the UK, with emphasis on implications for Evaluation of Transport Investments, Report to Department for Transport, London. ; 24. Handbury J., Weinstein D.E., 2011, Is New Economic Geography Right? Evidence from Price Data, NBER Working Paper No. 17067, May 2011, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachussets, USA. ; 25. Hicks B., 1996, Environmental Politics in Poland: A Social Movement Between Regime and Opposition, Columbia University Press, New York. ; 26. HMSO, 1977, Report of the Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Appraisal (Leitch Report), Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Appraisal (SACTRA), Department for Transport, London. ; 27. HMSO, 1998, A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone, Cm 3950, HMSO, London. ; 28. HMSO, 1999, Transport and the Economy, Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Appraisal (SACTRA), HMSO, London ; 29. HS2, 2012, Economic Case for HS2: Updated appraisal of transport user benefits and wider economic benefits: A report to Government by HS2 Ltd, Department for Transport, London, January 2012; http://www.dft.gov.uk/publications/hs2-economic-case--appraisal-update/ (17.06.2012). ; 30. HS2, 2013, Regional Economic Impacts (Report by KPMG LLP for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited (HS2 Ltd) acting for Department for Transport), September 2013, Ref. HS2/074; http://www.kpmg.com/UK/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/ PDF/Market%20Sector/Building%20and%20Construction/hs2-regional-economic- -impacts.pdf (1.10.2013). ; 31. Huang Y., 2010, Reinterpreting China's Success Through the New Economic Geography, Carnegie Papers, Asia Program, No. 115, November 2010, Carnegie Endowment, Washington. ; 32. Infrastruktura – klucz do rozwoju, 2002, Ministerstwo Infrastruktury, Rada Ministrów, Warszawa; http://www.mi.gov.pl (30.06.2002). ; 33. Judge E.J., 1996, The liberated consumer? Aspects of change in Eastern Europe, Proceedings of Chartered Institute of Transport, 5, 4, pp. 24–44. ; 34. Judge E.J., 2000, The regional and environmental dimension of Polish motorways policy', Regional Studies, 34, 5, pp. 488–493. ; - ; 35. Judge E.J., 2002, Environmental and economic development issues in the Polish motorway programme: A review and an analysis of the public debate, European Environment (Journal of European Environmental Policy), 12, 2, pp. 77–89. ; - ; 36. Judge E.J., 2008, Transport and economic development: comparisons and contrasts in theory, policy and practice between Poland and the UK, [in:] T.C. Cox, M. Myant (eds.), Reinventing Poland, Routledge, London, pp. 181–203. ; 37. Judge E.J., Button K.J., 1974, Inter urban roads in Great Britain: Perspectives and prospects, Transportation Planning and Technology, 2, 3, pp. 185–194. ; - ; 38. Judge E.J., Werpachowski K., Wishardt M., 2004a, Polish gminas' attitudes to Government motorway and road plans, Przegląd Geograficzny, 76, 2, pp. 125–141. ; 39. Judge E.J., Werpachowski K., Wishardt M., 2004b, Environmental and economic development issues in the Polish motorway and programme: some findings on local authority attitudes, Journal of Transport Geography, 12, 4, pp. 287–299. ; - ; 40. King A., Crewe I., 2013, The Blunders of Our Governments, OneWorld, London. ; 41. Komornicki T., Korcelli P., 2003, Alternative Scenarios of Transportation Network Development for EU Accession Countries, IASON Technical Note, IGiPZ PAN, 5, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw. ; 42. Krugman P., 2010, The New Economic Geography, Now Middle-Aged, Paper to Association of American Geographers, April 16, 2010; http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/aag.pdf (17.06.2012). ; 43. Mackie P., Worsley T., 2013, International Comparison of Transport Appraisal Practice: Overview Report,Institute for Transport Studies, Leeds University, April 2013, published by Department for Transport, July 2013; https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/209530/final-overview-report.pdf (2.10.2013). ; 44. Melo P.C., Graham D.J., Noland R.B., 2009, A meta-analysis of estimates of urban agglomeration economies, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39, pp. 332–342. ; - ; 45. NAO, 2013, High Speed 2: A review of early programme preparation, National Audit Office, London; http://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Full-Report.pdf (9.10.2013). ; 46. NWTC, 2011, The Economic Case for Transport Investment in the North, The Northern Way Transport Compact, March 2011; http://www.northernwaytransportcompact.com/downloads/Data%20Book%20v7.6.pdf (2.10.2013). ; 47. Odell M., 2013, Government's defence of HS2 shot down by one of its own advisers, Financial Times, 11 September 2013. ; 48. Ove Arup, 2005, Guide to Improving the Economic Evidence Base supporting Regional Economic and Spatial Strategies, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London; ; 49. Overman H.G., 2013, HS2 Regional Economic Impact: Garbage in ...?, LSE Spatial Economics Research Centre, Thursday, 12 September 2013; http://spatial-economics.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/hs2-regional-economic-impact-garbage-in.html (1.10.2013). ; 50. Pol ityka transportowa: program działania w kierunku przekształcenia transportu w system dostosowany do wymogów gospodarki rynkowej i nowych warunków współpracy gospodarczej w Europie, 1995, Ministerstwo Transportu i Gospodarki Morskiej, Warszawa. ; 51. Polityka transportowa państwa na lata 2000–2015 dla zrównoważonego rozwoju kraju,2001, Ministerstwo Transportu i Gospodarki Morskiej, Warszawa;www.katedr.republika.pl/hzal.htm (17.10.2013). ; 52. Preston J., Holvad T., 2005, A Review of the Empirical Evidence on the Additional Benefits of Road Transport Investment, Transport Studies Institute, Oxford University, Oxford; www.tsi.oxon.ac.uk (14.01.2005). ; 53. Program budowy autostrad w Polsce, 1992, Instytut Badawczy Dróg i Mostów, Warszawa. ; 54. Quinet E., Vickerman R., 2004, Principles of Transport Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. ; 55. Ramchurn R., 2013, Scrap HS2, and solve the North-South divide. While you're at it why not spend some of the money on a Manchester-Liverpool high speed rail?, Independent, 1 October 2013, p. 6. ; 56. SACTRA, 1999, Transport and the Economy, Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment, Department of Transport, London; www.dft.gov.uk (14.01.2005). ; 57. SERC, 2009, Strengthening Economic Linkages between Leeds and Manchester: Feasibility and Implications, Spatial Economics Research Centre, London School of Economics, under direction of Professor Henry Overman, for The Northern Way Transport Compact, November 2009; http://www.northernwaytransportcompact.com/downloads/Delivery%20Gaps/ Trans%20Pennine/Economic%20Linkages%20Between%20Leeds%20and%20Manchester. pdf (2.10.2013). ; 58. Solow R.M., 1956, A contribution to the theory of economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 1, pp. 65–94. ; - ; 59. Steer Davies Gleave, 2003, Guidance on preparing an Economic Impact Report, Department for Transport, London; www.dft.gov.uk (13.01.2006). ; 60. Strategia rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego Polski Wschodniej do roku 2020, 2008, MinisterstwoRozwoju Regionalnego, Warszawa;www.mrr.gov.pl/rozwoj_regionalny/polityka_regionalna/strategia... (11.09.2013). ; 61. Tavasszy L.A., Burgess A., Renes G., 2004, Final Publishable Report: Conclusions and recommendations for the assessment o economic impacts of transport projects and policies, IASON Deliverable D10. TNO Inro, Delft, Netherlands; www.inro.tno.nl/iason 1. 11.2004). ; 62. Update of Selected Potential Accessibility Measures, Draft Final Report, 2007, Spiekermann & Wegener Urban and Regional Research and RRG Spatial Planning and Geoinformation, Dortmund/Oldenburg; http://www.espon.eu (1.03.2007)2 ; 63. Vigar G., 2002, The Politics of Mobility: Transport, the Environment and Public Policy, Spon, London. ; 64. Węcławowicz G., Bański J., Degórski M., Komornicki T., Korcelli P., Śleszyński P., 2006, Przestrzenne zagospodarowanie Polski na początku XXI wieku, Monografie IGiPZ PAN, 6, Warszawa. ; 65. Wegener M., Komornicki T., Korcelli P., 2005, Spatial impacts of the Trans-European networks for the new EU member states, [in:] T. Komornicki, K.L. Czapiewski (eds.), New Spatial Relations in New Europe, Europa XXI, 13, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, pp. 27–44.

Relation:

Przegląd Geograficzny

Volume:

85

Issue:

4

Start page:

489

End page:

513

Format:

File size 1,2 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:39010 ; 0033-2143 ; 10.7163/PrzG.2013.4.1

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.181, Cz.3136, Cz.4187 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

pol

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure ; European Union. European Regional Development Fund

Objects

Similar

This page uses 'cookies'. More information