Theorising an Omnipresent Concept : Memory as a Thickening Factor of Populism

Mazzini, Mateusz

doi:2450-8462

- ris
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Csv

Theorising an Omnipresent Concept : Memory as a Thickening Factor of Populism Mazzini, Mateusz

Object structure

Theorising an Omnipresent Concept : Memory as a Thickening Factor of Populism

Acta Poloniae Historica T. 128 (2023), Mnemonic Wars in Poland

Mazzini, Mateusz

Polska Akademia Nauk. Komitet Nauk Historycznych ; Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla ; Fundacja Instytutu Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Instytut Historii Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Warszawa

2023

p. 27-44

populism ; memory ; symbolic thickening ; historical revisionism ; ideational approach

Within various fields of social sciences, populism is being constantly re-conceptualised to create a possibly most holistic definition of the phenomenon, one which would encompass all of its structural features and allow it to be applied to the largest number of empirical manifestations. Nonetheless, across different disciplines a growing consensus gains traction to define populism through the framework of ideology. As such, populism is understood as possessing a capability to attach itself to more powerful ideological concepts – nationalism, socialism, fascism. Thus, the central question in the study of populism as ideology needs to focus on the mechanics of strengthening populism in a given case. What makes one populism more radical than another? Using Freeden’s ideational approach and Mudde’s work on factors influencing intensity and efficiency of populism, this paper argues that the perception of the past in a given community, constructed through collective memory policies and expressed by means of historical revisionism, works as a ‘thickening agent’ fostering electoral success and increasing political durability of populist governance. Although seeking to create primarily a theoretical contribution, it will also encompass evidence of that modality from studying collective memory policies under Poland’s Law and Justice Party rule between 2015 and 2019.

Bernhard Michael and Jan Kubik, Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration (New York, 2014).
Dobrosielski Paweł, Spory o Grossa: Polskie problemy z pamięcią o Żydach (Warszawa, 2017).
Freeden Michael, ‘Is Nationalism a Distinct Ideology’, Political Studies, 46 (1998), 748–65.
Kubik Jan and Marta Kotwas, ‘Symbolic Thickening of Public Culture and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism in Poland’, East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 33 (2019), 435–71.
Mudde Cas, ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, 39 (2004), 541–63.
Muller Jan-Werner, What is Populism (Philadelphia, 2016).
Napiórkowski Marcin, Turbopatriotyzm (Wołowiec, 2019).
Olick Jeffrey, ‘Collective Memory: The Two Cultures’, Sociological Theory, 17 (1999), 333–48.
Rosanvallon Pierre, The Populist Century (Cambridge, 2021).
Rieff David, Against Remembrance (New Haven, 2012).
Tucker Avieser, ‘History – Myth or Reality: Reflections on the State of the Profession’, Journal of the Philosophy of History, i, 1 (2007), 125–35.