Publisher:

Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology Polish Academy of Sciences

Place of publishing:

Warsaw

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Abstract:

This article traces and exposes the material dimension of contemporary protests. In this piece, we consider protest as a particular type of human communication that gains intelligibility in specific social situations that are embodied in objects. This has led us to (re)think (about) the dialogue which exists between anthropology and communication in light of the role of material culture. We read and review these experiences from epistemological and theoretical frameworks of protest studies in Argentina and reconstruct social situations arising from our joint work developed at the research group Cosas Cotidianas (CoCo), which we co-coordinate, dedicated to analysing, from an ethnographic perspective, how objects ‘participate’ in social life. Our paper is structured into 3 parts. Firstly, an analysis of anthropology and communication is undertaken followed by protest(s) as social situations and finally, understanding protest through objects. We present how pots (in Spanish cacerolas) in Latin America, umbrellas in Hong Kong and waistcoats in Paris (France) appear as objects of protest in countries of the global south and north. The ‘cultural biography of things’ is proposed as a conceptual framework for our analysis

References:

Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arrueta, Cesar. 2012. “Discusiones acerca de la interdisciplina en comunicación. Aportes para la especificidad disciplinar.” Revista Pensar. Epistemología y Ciencias Sociales (7): 1–17.
Baudrillard, Jean. 1975. El sistema de los objetos. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI.
Boas, Franz. 1897. “The Social Organization and the Secret Societies of the Kwakiutl Indians.” Report of the U.S. National Museum for 1895: 311–738.
Boyer, Pierre; Thomas Delemotte; Germain Gauthier; Vincent Rollet; and Benoit Schmutz. 2019. “Lesdéterminants de la mobilisation des ˝gilets jaunes˝.” Série des Documents de Travail – CREST (06): 1–30. http://crest.science/RePEc/wpstorage/2019-06.pdf
Caggiano, Sergio and María Graciela Rodríguez. 2008. “Comunicación y Antropología: continuar el diálogo.” Paper presented at the IX Argentine Congress of Social Anthropology. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences – Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Posadas.
Cefai, Daniel. 2012 [2002]. “¿Qué es una arena pública? Algunas pautas para un acercamiento pragmático.” In Cefaï, Daniel and Gusfield, Joseph. La herencia del pragmatismo: Conflictos de urbanidad y pruebas de civismo. La Tour D’aiges: Editions de L’Aube.
Cervio, Ana Lucía y Anvy Guzman Romero. 2017. “Los recursos expresivos en la protesta social. El caso del “acampe villero” en Buenos Aires.” Iberofórum. Revista de Ciencias Sociales de la Universidad Iberoamericana 12(23): 36–64.
Cross, Jamie. 2003. “Anthropology and the Anarchists: Culture, Power, and Practice in Militant Anti-Capitalist Protests.” Theomai. Red Internacional de Estudios sobre Sociedad, Naturaleza y Desarrollo (7). https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/124/12400708.pdf
Escobar, Arturo. 1992. “Culture, Practice and Politics: Anthropology and the Study of Social Movements.” Critique of Anthropology, 12: 395–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X9201200402
Geertz, Clifford. 1987. La Interpretación de las culturas. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Gibb, Robert. 2002. “Toward an Anthropology of Social Movements”, Journal des anthropologues [En ligne], 85–86, consulté le 20 janvier 2022. https://doi.org/10.4000/jda.2904
Gluckman, Max. 1940. Analysis of a Social Situation in Modern Zululand, Bantu Studies, 12: 1–30.
Godelier, Maurice. 1998. El enigma del don. Buenos Aires: Editorial Paidós.
Gonzalez Villarruel, Alejandro. 2010 “La vida social de los objetos etnográficos y su desalmada mercantilización”. Alteridades [online] 20 (40): 65–76.
Ismangil, Milan and Lee Maggy 2021. “Protests in Hong Kong during the Covid-19 pandemic”. Crime Media Culture. Vol. 17(1) 17–20. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1741659020946229
Jasper, James. 2011. Emotions and Social Movements: Twenty Years of Theory and Research, Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150015
Kammerer, María Luján and María Victoria Sánchez Roncero. 2005. “El cacerolazo como nueva forma de expresión popular.” Question 1(6): w/n.
Kluckhohn, Clyde. 1960. Paper prepared for the Wenner-Gren Foundation’s Burg Wartenstein Symposium (no. 13), “Comparative Aspects of Human Communication,” held in Austria, https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1525/aa.1961.63.5.02a00010
Knapp, Mark. 1997. La comunicación no verbal. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Paidós.
Kopytoff, Igor. 1986. “The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process” In Appadurai, Arjun. The Social Life of Things. Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leach, Edmund. 1977. “Culture and Communication. The logic by which symbols are connected. An introduction to the use of structuralist analysis in social anthropology”, Philosophy and Rhetoric 10 (3): 205–207.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1951. “Language and the analysis of social laws.” American Anthropologist 53: 155–63.
Longoni, Ana. 2010. “Arte y Política. Políticas visuales del movimiento de derechos humanos desde la última dictadura: fotos, siluetas y escraches.” Aletheia: Revista de la Maestría en Historia y Memoria de la FaHCE 1 (1): 1–23.
Longoni, Ana. 2014. “Coming out of Silence: Art and Politics in Latin America from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Art Journal 72 (2): 14–19.
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1987. Los argonautas del Pacífico Occidental. Barcelona: Península.
Morozov, Andrew, Sergei Petrovskii, and Sergey Gavrilets. 2019. “The Yellow Vests Movement – a Case of Long Transient Dynamics?” SocArXiv. Doi: 10.31235/osf.io/tpyux.
Ngai, Pun. 2020. “Reflecting on Hong Kong protests in 2019–2020”. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 10 (2): 333–338. https://content.csbs.utah.edu/~mli/Economics%205420-6420/Pun-Reflecting%20on%20Hong%20Kong%20Protests.pdf
Pereiro, Julio. 2019. “Sin palabras: génesis y desarrollos de los estudios sobre la comunicación no verbal.” Question 1(64): w/n https://doi.org/10.24215/16696581e205
Schuster, Federico and Sebastian Pereyra. 2001. “La protesta social en la Argentina democrática. Balance y perspectivas de una forma de acción política.” In La protesta social en Argentina. Transformaciones económicas y crisis social en el interior del país, edited by Giarraca, Norma et al, 41–63. Buenos Aires: Editorial Alianza.
Pereyra, Sebastian. 2013. “Procesos de movilización y movimientos sociales desde la transición a la democracia.” Observatorio Latinoamericano (12): 235–253.
Romanutti, María Virginia. 2012. “Identidad y protesta social: Contribuciones al estudio de su relación.” Andamios 9(20): 259–274.
Sapir, Edward. 1929. “The status of linguistics as a science.” Language Vol. 5 (4): 207–214
Soar, Katy and Paul-François Tremlett. 2017. “Protest objects: bricolage, performance and counter-archaeology.” World Archaeology 49(4): 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2017.1350600
Svampa, Maristella and Pablo Stefanoni (eds.). 2007. Memoria, Insurgencias y Movimientos Sociales. Buenos Aires: Ed. El Colectivo
Telechea, Roxana. 2006. “Historia de los cacerolazos: 1982–2001.” Razón y Revolución (16): 141–184.
Tilly, Charles. 1995. “Contentious Repertoires in Great Britain, 1758–1834.” In Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action, compiled by Traugott, Mark, 15–42. Durham: Duke University Press.
Weiner, Annette. 1976. Women of Value, Men of Renown: New Perspectives in Trobriand Exchange. Austin: The University of Texas Press.
Werner, Carlota and Johanna Sunder-Plassmann. 2014. “Hacked Protest Objects”. The Museum of Modern Art, New York, May 28th, 2014. https://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2013/designandviolence/hacked-protest-objects-anon/?fbclid=IwAR0pJkYt18LyMzVcjb_jDpQcGTF8AUFS5e5Y-1fRW8umaB7RiZ0eO489-Gsg

Relation:

Ethnologia Polona

Volume:

43

Start page:

179

End page:

194

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:238368 ; 0137-4079 ; eISSN 2719-6976 ; doi:10.23858/ethp.2022.43.3004

Source:

IAiE PAN, call no. P 366 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 367 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 368 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC-ND 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Library of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Access:

Open