Object

Title: Entrepreneurial in-migration and rural development in Czechia: A challenge of integrating the local and extra-local in rural planning

Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 92 No. 3 (2019)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Abstract:

Despite the decreasing importance of farming for rural economies, diversification of farming activities is still perceived by the EU as one of the sources of new jobs in rural areas. However, as authors argue, there are more efficient ways for new job generation associated with entrepreneurial rural in-migration. Such migration movement brings new entrepreneurial skills, knowledge, and creativity to rural areas. By presenting the results of our interview survey with urban newcomers to peripheral rural areas of Czechia, we would like to draw attention to this alternative and under-researched way of rural development, especially in the Central and Eastern Europe. This article analyses the contribution of entrepreneurial in-migrants to local economies and examines new ways for better incorporation of rural entrepreneurial in-migration into rural development planning.

References:

AKGÜN A.Y.A., BAYCAN-LEVENT T.N., NIJKAMP P., POOT J., 2011. Roles of local and newcomer entrepreneurs in rural development: A comparative meta-analytic study. Regional Studies, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1207-1223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003792500 ; ATTERTON J., AFFLECK A., 2010. Rural businesses in the North East of England. Retrieved from https://www.ncl.ac.uk/media/wwwnclacuk/centreforruraleconomy/files/NE-rural-business.pdf [2 November 2018]. ; ATTERTON J., BRYDEN J., JOHNSON T.G., 2012. Rural economic transformation in the UK and US [in:] M. Shucksmith, D.L., Brown, S. Shortall, J., Verguns, M.E., Warner (eds.), Rural transformations and rural policies in the US and UK, London: Routlege, pp. 117-137. ; BARTOŠ M., KUŠOVÁ D., TĚŠITEL J., NOVOTNÁ M., KOPP J., MAHÁČEK J., MOSS L.A.G., GLORIOSO R.S., 2011. Amenitní migrace do venkovských oblastí České republiky. Kostelec nad Černými lesy: Lesnická práce. ; BENSON M., O'REILLY K., 2009. Migration and the search for a better way of life: A critical exploration of lifestyle migration. The Sociological Review, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 547-766. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01864.x ; BERNARD J., 2006. Sociální integrace přistěhovalců z velkoměsta na vesnici v České republice a v Rakousku. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 741-760. ; BOSWORTH G., ATTERTON J., 2012. Entrepreneurial in-migration and neoendogenous rural development. Rural Sociology, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 254-279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00079.x ; CARSON D.A., CARSON D.B., EIMERMANN M., 2017. International winter tourism entrepreneurs in northern Sweden: Understanding migration, lifestyle, and business motivations. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2017.1339503 ; ČERMÁK Z., NOVÁK J., OUŘEDNÍČEK M., 2011. Saldo migrace / Net migration [in:] M. Ouředníček, J. Temelová, L. Pospíšilová (eds.), Atlas sociálně prostorové diferenciace České republiky. Praha: Nakladatelství Karolinum, pp. 89-90. ; EUROPEAN COMMISSION - AEIDL, 1996. The Cork Declaration: Rural Europe - Future Perspectives. European Conference on Rural Development, Cork (Ireland), November 7-9, 1996. ; EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2003. EU research on social sciences and: The future of Europe's rural periphery, the role of entrepreneurship in responding to employment problems and social marginalization. Brussels: European Commission, http://cordis.europa.eu/docs/publications/1001/100124141-6_en.pdf [2 November 2018]. ; GKARTZIOS M., SCOTT M., 2014. Placing housing in rural development: Exogenous, endogenous and neo-endogenous approaches. Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 241-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12030 ; GOSNELL H., ABRAMS J., 2009. Amenity migration: diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal, vol. 76, no. 4., pp. 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-009-9295-4 ; GRAY J., 2000. The Common Agricultural Policy and the re-invention of the rural in the European Community. Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 30-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00130 ; HALLIDAY J., COOMBES M., 1995. In search of counterurbanisation: some evidence from Devon on the relationship between patterns of migration and motivation. Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 433-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(95)00032-1 ; HENDL J., 2005. Kvalitativní vý zkum: Zá kladní teorie, metody a aplikace. Praha: Portá l. ; HERSLUND L., 2012. The rural creative class: Counterurbanisation and entrepreneurship in the Danish countryside. Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00560.x ; HRUŠKA V., 2014. Diferenciace venkovského prostoru na příkladu Moravskoslezského kraje. [Dissertation thesis], Brno: Masarykova univerzita, Přírodovědecká fakulta. ; HRUŠKA V., CZAPIEWSKI K., KOVÁCS Z., 2015. Rural economic development in the post-agricultural era: Policy recommendations. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, vol. 39, pp. 129-144. https://doi.org/10.7163/SOW.39.8 ; HUGO H., MORÉN-ALEGRET R., 2008. International migration to non-metropolitan areas of high income countries: Editorial introduction. Population, Space and Place, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 473-477. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.515 ; ILBERY B., BOWLER I., 1998. From agricultural productivism to post-productivism [in:] B. Ilbery (ed.), The geography of rural change, Essex: Longmann, pp. 57-84. ; KALANTARIDIS C., 2010. In-migration, entrepreneurship and rural-urban interdependencies: The case of East Cleveland, North East England. Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 418-427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.03.001 ; KOVÁCS Z., BOROS L., HEGEDŰS G., LADOS G., 2013. Returning people to the homeland: Tools and methods supporting remigrants in a European context [in]: T. Lang (ed.), Return migration in Central Europe: Current trends and an analysis of policies supporting returning migrants, Forum IfL 21, Leipzig: Leibniz-Institut für Länderkunde, pp. 58-94. ; KOVÁCS Z., CSACHOVÁ S., FERENC M., HRUŠKA V., KONOPSKI M., 2015. Development policies on rural peripheral areas in Visegrad countries: a comparative policy analysis. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, vol. 39, pp. 77-102. https://doi.org/10.7163/SOW.39.6 ; LAPPING M., 2006. Rural policy and planning [in:] P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P. Mooney (eds.), Handbook of rural studies, London: SAGE, pp. 104-122. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n7 ; LIGHT I., BHACHU P., KARAGEORGIS S., 2004. Migration networks and immigrant entrepreneurship [in:] I. Light, P. Bhachu (eds.), Immigration and entrepreneurship: Culture, capital, and ethnic networks, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, pp. 25-49. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203789056-2 ; MAYER H., HABERSETZER A., MEILI R., 2016. Rural-urban linkages and sustainable regional development: The role of entrepreneurs in linking peripheries and centers. Sustainability, vol. 8, no. 8, 745; https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080745 ; MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, 2018. Rural Development Programme of the Czech Republic for the period 2014-2020, Version 6.2. ; MOSELEY M.J., 2003. Rural development: Principles and practice. Thousand Oaks (California): Sage. ; MURDOCH J., 1992. Representing the region: Welsh farmers and the British state [in:] T. Marsden, P. Lowe, S. Whatmore (eds.), Labour and Locality: uneven development in the labour process, London: David Fulton, pp. 160-181. ; NEWBERY R., SIWALE J., HENLEY A., 2017. Rural entrepreneurship theory in the developing and developed world. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750316686232 ; NORTH D., SMALLBONE D., 2006. Developing entrepreneurship and enterprise in Europe's peripheral rural areas: Some issues facing policy-makers. European Planning Studies, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500339125 ; NOVOTNÁ M., 2013. Formy podnikání amentních migrantů na venkově [in:] K. Mičudová (ed.), Trendy v podnikání 2013, Plzeň: Západočeská univerzita v Plzni, 1st edn., 6 pp. ; OUŘEDNÍČEK M., NOVÁK J., ŠIMON M., 2013. Současné změny migrační bilance nejmenších českých obcí [in:] Výroční konference České geografické společnosti. Nové výzvy pro geografii, Brno: Masarykova univerzita, pp. 246-255. ; PĚLUCHA M., KVĚTOŇ V., 2017. The role of EU rural development policy in the neoproductivist agricultural paradigm. Regional Studies, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 1860-1870. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1282608 ; PÍŠA J., 2019. The lawn grew too quickly! Perception of rural idyll by Czech amenity migrants. GeoScape, vol. 12, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2019-0004 ; PŁAZIAK M., RACHWAŁ T., 2014. The role of entrepreneurship in regional development strategies (based on the Polish National Strategy of Regional Development 2010-2020). Europa XXI, vol. 26, pp. 97-110. ; POSPĚCH P., 2014. Discursive no man's land: Analysing the discourse of the rural in the transitional Czech Republic. Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 34, pp. 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.006 ; RAY C., 2006. Neo-endogeneous development [in:] P. Cloke, T. Marsden, P. Mooney (eds.), Handbook of rural studies, London: Sage, pp. 278-292. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.n19 ; ROWLEY T., 2003. The rural identity crisis. Rural Policy Research Institute, www.rupri.org. ; SMALLBONE D., 2009. Fostering entrepreneurship in rural areas [in:] J. Potter, A.R. Hofer (eds.), Strengthening entrepreneurship and economic development in East Germany: Lessons from local approaches, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, pp. 161-187. ; STOCKDALE A., 2006. Migration: Pre-requisite for rural economic regeneration? Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 354-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.11.001 ; STOCKDALE A., 2014. Unravelling the migration decision-making process: English early retirees moving to rural mid-Wales. Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 34, pp. 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.010 ; ŠIMON M., 2014. Exploring counterurbanisation in a post-socialist context: Case of the Czech Republic. Sociologi Ruralis, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 117-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00576.x ; ŠIMON M., BERNARD J., 2016. Rural idyll without rural sociology? Changing features, functions and research of the Czech countryside. Eastern European Countryside, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1515/eec-2016-0003 ; VAN DER PLOEG J.D., RENTING H., BRUNORI G., KNICKEL K., MANNION J., MARSDEN T., ROEST K.D., SEVILLA-GUZMÁN E., VENTURA F., 2000. Rural devel opment: From practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 391-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00156 ; WOODS M., 2011. Rural. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844304

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

92

Issue:

3

Start page:

347

End page:

363

Format:

File size 0,3 MB

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:81475 ; 0016-7282 (print) ; 2300-7362 (online) ; 10.7163/GPol.0153

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Operational Program Digital Poland, 2014-2020, Measure 2.3: Digital accessibility and usefulness of public sector information; funds from the European Regional Development Fund and national co-financing from the state budget.

This page uses 'cookies'. More information