@misc{Szmidt_Eulalia._Autor_A_2001,
 author={Szmidt, Eulalia. Autor and Kacprzyk, Janusz (1947– ). Autor},
 copyright={Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license},
 address={Warszawa},
 journal={Raport Badawczy = Research Report},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2001},
 publisher={Instytut Badań Systemowych. Polska Akademia Nauk},
 publisher={Systems Research Institute. Polish Academy of Sciences},
 language={eng},
 abstract={We extend the main idea of a fuzzy analysis of consensus introduced by Spilman, Spilman and Bezdek – that is based on a concept of a distance from consensus – to a case when individual testimonies are individual intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, as opposed to fuzzy preference relations commonly employed. Intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, that in addition to amembership degree include a hesitation margin, can better reflect the very imprecison of testimonies of the individuals during the consensus reaching process. Our solution, obtained as a new interval valued measure of a distance from consensus, better reflects both real human perception and a soft nature of consensus.},
 title={A consensus reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations},
 type={Text},
 keywords={Intuicjonistyczne zbiory rozmyte, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation, Intuicjonistyczne rozmyte relacje preferencji, Distance from consensus, Consensus, Konsensus, Relacja preferencji},
}