@misc{Gusti_Mykola_Comparison_2009,
 author={Gusti, Mykola and Jęda, Waldemar Paweł and Jonas, Matthias and Nahorski, Zbigniew (1945– ) and Nilsson, Sten},
 copyright={Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license},
 address={Warszawa},
 journal={Raport Badawczy = Research Report},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2009},
 publisher={Instytut Badań Systemowych. Polska Akademia Nauk},
 publisher={Systems Research Institute. Polish Academy of Sciences},
 language={eng},
 abstract={This study is a preparatory exercise. The focus is on the analysis of uncertainty in greenhouse gas emission inventories. Inventory uncertainty is monitored, but not regulated, under the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The six available techniques to analyze the uncertainty in the emission changes that countries agreed to realize by the end of the Protocol's first commitment period 2008-2012 were compared.},
 title={Comparison of Preparatory Signal Analysis Techniques for Consideration in the (POST-) Kyoto Policy Process.},
 type={Text},
 URL={http://www.rcin.org.pl/Content/109533/PDF/RB-2009-34.pdf},
 keywords={Emisja gazów cieplarnianych, Kyoto protocol, Compliance, Zgodność, Zobowiązania do ograniczenia i redukcji emisji, Emission limitation and reduction commitments, Greenhouse gas emissions, Protokół z kioto, Niepewność w prognozowaniu emisji, Uncertainty in emission estimates, Emissions change-versus-uncertainty analysis, Confidence in and detectability of commitments},
}