Object

Title: ESPON as a tool of national and regional policy

Subtitle:

Europa XXI 25 (2014)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

pp. 23-35

References:

1. Bański J., Garcia-Blanco G., 2013, European land use patterns, Rural Studies, vol. 32, PTG-IGiPZ PAN, Warszawa, 264 pp.
2. Dymén Ch., Essig S., Ferenc M., Górczyńska M., Kaucic J., Konopski M., Lange Scherbenske S., Schuh B., 2014, Accessible ESPON knowledge and its application in local and regional context, Europa XXI, vol.25, pp. 51-68
-
3. ESPON 2013 Programme External Evaluation, 2011, Final Report, Loxley Consultancy Ltd, Lindfield, 68 pp.
4. ESPON 2013 Programme, http://www.espon.eu/ [3 March 2014].
5. ESPON 2013 Programme. European observation network on territorial development and cohesion, 2007, European Commission, 85 pp.6
6. ESPON 2013 Project – USESPON, http://www.espon-usespon.eu/ [3 March 2014].
7. ESPON Mid-Term Evaluation Update Final Report, 2005, MVA, Woking, 109 pp.
8. ESPON Polish Contact Point, http://en.espon.pl/ [3 March 2014].
9. ESPON Projects - Final overview, 2012, ESPON Coordination Unit, Luxemburg, 90 pp.
10. ESPON 2004, ESPON 2006 project - 1.1.1. Potentials for polycentric development in Europe, Final Report, 1000 pp.
11. ESPON 2007, ESPON 2006 project - 1.4.3 – Study on urban functions. Final Report, 253 pp.
12. ESPON 2007, ESPON 2006 project - 4.1.3 - Feasibility study on monitoring territorial development based on ESPON key indicators. Final Report, 469 pp.
13. Evaluation of the European Observation Network for Territorial Development and Cohesion (ESPON) Programme. Final Report, 2013, ADE, Louvain-la-Neuve, 78 pp.
14. Ex-ante Evaluation of the Operational Programme ESPON 2007-2013 "European Observation Network on Territorial Development and Cohesion". Final Ex-ante Evaluation Report, 2006. EureConsult S.A., TERSYN, ECOSYSTEMS, 131 pp.
15. Faludi A., Waterhout B., 2002, The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No Masterplan, Routledge, The RTPI Library Series, London, New York, 224 pp.
16. Gajović V., 2013, Comparative analysis of different methods and obtained results for delineation of functional urban areas, Spatium International Review, 29, pp. 8-15.
-
17. Hague C., 2005, ESPON and territorial research and practice in Europe, European Territorial Research in Progress. Conference Proceedings of the 1st ESPON Scientific Conference, ESPON, Malmö, pp.23-35.
18. Huff D.L., 1973, The delineation of a national system of planning regions on the basis of urban spheres of influence, Regional Studies, 7, pp. 323–329.
-
18. Jansen L.J.M., Zivanovic T., Borsboom-Van Beurden J., Trkulja S., Overduin T., Zivkovic L., Djordjevic A., 2012, Improving spatial planning by developing an indicator-based monitoring system in the Republic of Serbia, paper from FIG Working Week 2012 - Knowing to manage the territory, protect the environment, evaluate the cultural heritage, 6-10 May 2012, Rome, http://www.fig.net/pub/fig2012/papers/ts02j/TS02J_jansen_zivanovic_et_al_6062.pdf [3 March 2014].
19. Korcelli P., 1976, Aglomeracje miejskie w systemach osadniczych, Przegląd Geograficzny, 48, 4, pp. 589–598.
20. Korcelli-Olejniczak E., 2012, Region metropolitalny – pojęcie, struktura przestrzenna, dynamika, Prace Geograficzne, IGiPZ PAN, 235, Warszawa, 189 pp.
21. Kryteria delimitacji miejskich obszarów funkcjonalnych ośrodków wojewódzkich, 2013, Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego, Warszawa, 26 pp.
22. McKenzie R.D., 1933, The Metropolitan Community, McGraw-Hill, New York, 352 pp.
23. National Regional Development Strategy of the Republic of Bulgaria for the period 2005-2015, 2005, Sofia, 108 pp.
24. Regional Use of ESPON Knowledge, 2010, Working Paper from the internal ESPON Seminar 3-4 December 2009 in Malmö. http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Publications/SeminarsReports/Malmoe_Seminar_Report.pdf [3 March 2014].
25. Science in support of European Territorial Development and Cohesion, 2013, Second ESPON 2013 Scientific Report, Coordination Unit, Luxemburg.
26. Śleszyński P., 2013, Delimitacja Miejskich Obszarów Funkcjonalnych stolic województw, Przegląd Geograficzny, 85, 2, pp. 173–197.
-
26. Sohn Ch., Stambolic N., 2013, European functional border regions: An urban potential typology, Science in support of European Territorial Development and Cohesion, Second ESPON 2013 Scientific Report, Coordination Unit, Luxemburg, pp. 74-78.
27. Spatial Plan of The Republic of Serbia. 2010-2014-2020. Abridged version, 2010, Republic Agency of Spatial Planning, Belgrade, 48 pp.
28. Territorial Dimensions of the Europe 2020 Strategy, 2013, ESPON Atlas, ESPON 2013 Programme Coordination Unit, Luxemburg, 68 pp.
29. Zaktualizowana Koncepcja Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju, 2005, Rządowe Centrum Studiów Strategicznych, Warszawa, 137 pp

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

25

Start page:

23

End page:

35

Format:

File size 3,6 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:46598 ; 1429-7132 ; 10.7163/Eu21.2014.25.2

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Objects

Similar

This page uses 'cookies'. More information