Object

Title: Political borders under ecological control in the Polish borderlands

Creator:

Więckowski, Marek [1971- ]. Autor

Date issued/created:

2018

Resource Type:

Article

Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 91 No. 1 (2018)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Abstract:

In Central and Eastern Europe, including Poland, many protected areas are situated in the borderlands. Borders (e.g. between states), boundaries (of protected areas), and frontiers (e.g. an eco-frontier) are produced by humans and underline control and ownership of land (territory). These borderlines overlap with each another – can be visible or not, and function as barriers to the flows and economic activity of human beings, with their juridical consequences. In this paper the focus has been placed on the role of that borders play in the construction of space, especially in relation to attractive natural areas in the borderlands of Poland, whether or not they are protected. Additionally the author proposes and tries to illustrate the role of the ‘periodisation’ of nature protection in the borderlands and the relationship between them.

References:

1. BOYD S., 2004. National parks: Wilderness and culture [in:] A. Lew, M. Hall, A. Williams (eds.), Companion to tourism, Malden: Blackwell, pp. 473-483.
2. Brush S., Stabinsky D. (eds.), 1996. Valuing local knowledge: Indigenous people and intellectual property rights. Washington, DC: Island Press.
3. Bruslé Perrier L., 2007. The front and the line: The paradox of South American frontiers applied to the Bolivian case. Geopolitics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 57-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040601031156
4. Buza M., Turnock D., 2004. A research note: Planning for the Carpathian. GeoJournal, no. 60, pp. 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000033589.04305.fe
5. Castree N., 2008. Neoliberalising nature: Processes, effects and evaluations. Environment and Planning A, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39100
6. Chiusti S., Saarinen J., 2017. Local participation in transfrontier tourism: Case of Sengwe community in Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area, Zimbabwe. Development Southern Africa, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 260-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2016.1259987
7. Degórska B., 1994 Wybrane transgraniczne problemy ekologiczne wschodniego i zachodniego pogranicza Polski [in:] P. Eberhardt, K. Miros (eds.), Węzłowe problemy współpracy przygranicznej, Biuletyn, 5, Warszawa: Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN, pp. 163-172.
8. DENISIUK Z., STOYKO S., TERRAY J., 1997. Experience in cross-border cooperation for national park and protected areas in central Europe [in:] J.G. Nelson, R. Serafin (eds.) National parks and protected areas: Keystones to conservation and sustainable development, Berlin: Springer, pp.145-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60907-7_13
9. Dołzbłasz S., 2010. Uwarunkowania przyrodnicze we współpracy transgranicznej finansowanej z funduszy UE w Polsce. Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, vol. 26, pp. 25-35.
10. Dołzbłasz S., 2013. Cross-border co-operation in the euroregions at the Polish-Czech and Polish-Slovak borders. European Countryside, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 102-114. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2013-0007
11. Eberhardt P., 2012. The Curzon Line as the eastern boundary of Poland: The origins and the political background. Geographia Polonica, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 5-21. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2012.1.1
12. Eberhardt P. 2015. The Oder-Neisse Line as Poland's western border: As postulated and made a reality. Geographia Polonica, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 77-105. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0007
13. Fall J., 2002. Divide and rule: Constructing human boundaries in 'boundless nature'. GeoJournal, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 243-251. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000017955.72829.15
14. Fall J., Egerer H.M., 2004. Constructing the Carpathians: The Carpathian convention and the search for a spatial ideal. Revue de géographie alpine, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 98-106. https://doi.org/10.3406/rga.2004.2296
15. Fall J., 2005, Drawing the line: Nature, hybridity and politics in transboundary spaces. Border Regions Series, Aldershot: Ashgate.
16. Guyot S., 2011. The eco-frontier paradigm: Rethinking the links between space, nature and politics. Geopolitics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 675-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2010.538878
17. Hanks J., 2003. Transfrontier conservation areas (TFCAs) in Southern Africa: Their role in conserving biodiversity, socioeconomic development and promoting a culture of peace. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, vol. 17, no. 1-2, p. 127-148. https://doi.org/10.1300/J091v17n01_08
18. Hartshorne R., 1936. Suggestions on the terminology of political boundaries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 22, pp. 56-57.
19. Kałuski S., 1994. The new Eastern Polish border in the face of environmental and socio-political problems [in:] W.A. Gallusser (ed.), Political boundaries and coexistence, Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 57-64.
20. LASLAZ L., 2009. La collaboration environnementale transfrontalière, constituante d'un front écologique? Limites et perspectives des mises en réseau des espaces protégés alpins. L'Espace Politique, http://espacepolitique.revues.org/index1439.html [2 November 2017].
21. Lunstrum E., 2013. Articulated sovereignty: Extending Mozambican state power through the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park. Political Geography, vol. 36, September 2013, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.04.003
22. MICHNIAK D., WIĘCKOWSKI M., ROSIK P., STĘPNIAK M., 2015. The impact of selected planned motorways and expressways on the potential accessibility of the Polish-Slovak borderland with respect to tourism development. Moravian Geographical Report, vol. 23, no. 1 pp. 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2015-0002
23. Miszczuk A., 2013. Uwarunkowania peryferyjności regionu przygranicznego. Lublin: Norbertinum.
24. MINICONI R., GUYOT S., 2010. Conflicts and cooperation in the mountainous Mapuche territory (Argentina). Revue de Géographie Alpine / Journal of Alpine Research, (98-1), http://rga.revues. org/1151 [12 February 2014].
25. MOUMANEIX C., 2007. La coopération transfrontalière entre les Etats-Unis et le Canada, le cas des parcs frontaliers de North Cascades (Washington), Skagit Valley (Colombie britannique) et Wrangell Saint-Elias (Alaska), Kluane (Yukon). AFEC Etudes canadiennes, vol. 33, no. 62, pp. 181-194.
26. Paasi A., 2006. Cities in a world economy. Third edition, London: Pine Forge Press.
27. Price F.M., 2015. Transnational governance in mountain regions: Progress and prospects. Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 49, pp. 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.09.009
28. Raffestin C., 1980. Pour une Géographie du Pouvoir. Paris: Litec.
29. Ramutsindela M., 2004. Parks and people in postcolonial societies: Experiences in Southern Africa. The GeoJournal Library, 79, Dordrecht-Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
30. Ramutsindela M., (ed.) 2014. Cartographies of nature: How nature conservation animates borders. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
31. Ramutsindela M., 2015. Natured borders. Geoforum, vol. 61, pp. 135-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.007
32. Rąkowski G., 2000. Transgraniczne obszary chronione na wschodnim pograniczu Polski: Zarys koncepcji. Warszawa: Instytut Ochrony Środowiska.
33. Reinius W.S., Fredman P., 2007. Protected areas as attractions. Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 839-854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2007.03.011
34. Stasiak A., 1995. Współpraca przygraniczna w koncepcji strategicznego rozwoju kraju [in:] A. Stasiak, K. Miros (eds.), Polska i jej współdziałanie transgraniczne z sąsiadami: Materiały z konferencji, Warszawa-Szklarska Poręba-Bocholt 4-11.05.1994. Cz. I, Warszawa: Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN, pp. 1-11.
35. SAARINEN J., 2004. Tourism and touristic representations of nature [in:] A. Lew, M. Hall, A. Williams (eds.), A Companion to tourism, Malden: Blackwell, pp. 438-449. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752272.ch35
36. Sandell K., 2005. Access, tourism, and democracy: A conceptual framework and the non-establishment of a proposed national park in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250510014291
37. Timothy D.J., 2002. Tourism and political boundaries. Advances in Tourism, 8, London-New York: Routledge.
38. Turnock D., 2001. Cross-border conservation in East Central Europe: The Danube-Carpathian complex and the contribution of the world wide fund for nature. GeoJournal, vol. 55, no. 2-4, pp. 655-681. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021709515847
39. Voloscuk I., 1999. National parks and biosphere reserves in Carpathians – The last nature paradises. Tatranska Lomnica: Association of the Carpathian National Parks and Biosphere Reserves.
40. Więckowski M., 2002. Polish-Slovak transboundary cooperation. Geografický Časopis, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 255-270.
41. Więckowski M., 2004. Przyrodnicze uwarunkowania kształtowania się polsko-słowackich więzi transgranicznych. Prace Geograficzne, 195, Warszawa: Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN.
42. Więckowski M., 2010. Tourism development in the borderlands of Poland. Geographia Polonica, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 67-81. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2010.2.5
43. Więckowski M., 2013. Eco-frontier in the mountainous borderlands of Central Europe. The case of Polish border parks. Journal of Alpine Research / Revue de géographie alpine, vol. 101, no. 2, http://rga.revues.org/2107 [23 June 2017].
44. Więckowski M., 2014. Overlapping political and ecological borders on the Polish borderlands [in:] M. Ramutsindela (ed.), Cartographies of nature: how nature conservation animates borders, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 219-237.
45. Więckowski M., Michniak D., Bednarek-Szczepańska M., Chrenka B., Ira V., Komornicki T., Rosik P., Stępniak M., Székely V., Śleszyński P., Świątek D., Wiśniewski R., 2014. Road accessibility to tourist destinations of the Polish-Slovak borderland: 2010-2030 prediction and planning. Geographia Polonica, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 5-26. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2014.1
46. Young L., Rabb M., 1992. New park on the bloc: Hungary, Czechoslovakia and Austria must overcome obstacles to create Eastern Europe's first trilateral park. National Parks, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 35-40.
47. ZAWILIŃSKA B., 2013. Landscape parks and the development of tourism in the protected areas of the Polish Carpathians [in:] J. Kozak, K. Ostapowicz, A. Bytnerowicz, B. Wyżga (eds.), The Carpathians: Integrating nature and society towards sustainability, Berlin-Heidelberg: SpringerVerlag, pp. 461-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12725-0_32

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

91

Issue:

1

Start page:

127

End page:

138

Format:

File size 1,1 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:64181 ; 0016-7282 ; 10.7163/GPol.0105

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY-SA 3.0 PL license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY-SA 3.0 PL] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY-SA 3.0 PL license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

This page uses 'cookies'. More information