Knowledge as a socially active substance. Our interpretations versus Others "self-interpretations"

Zalewska, Anna

doi:0066-5924

Planned object

Title: Knowledge as a socially active substance. Our interpretations versus Others "self-interpretations"

Abstract:

This article examines the relation between knowledge of the past and the need for spiritual guidance on the part of the general public. The case study looks at how neo-pagans in our country use and abuse information about the pre-Christian world. By analysing several of the channels (leaflets, websites, performances, regulations, etc.) via which neo-pagans directly express their own positions and attitudes toward information about the past, the article shows how the dehumanized studies about pagan religion are filled with the fictive elements of neo-myth treated here as a dangerous or at least mediocre fabric which structures an awareness of history. It is argued that the side-effects of the irreverence toward the Other, as well as the duties archaeologists and historians (but also novelists, journalists, filmmakers, etc.) have in balancing knowledge and contemporary reality, deserve to be analysed and understood

References:

Ankersmit, F. 1989 . Historiography and postmodernism. History and Theory 28: 137—53
Baudrillard, J. 1998. Precesja symulakrów. In Postmodernizm, R. Nycz (ed.), 175—89. Kraków
Bauman, Z. 2003. Razem, osobno. Kraków
Benoist de, A. 2005. On being a pagan. Atlanta
Booth, W.C. 1988. The company we keep: An ethics of fiction. Berkeley
Borgmann, A. 1999. Holding on to reality. The nature of information at the turn of the millennium. Chicago
Brückner, A. 1918. Mitologia słowiańska. Kraków
Connor, W. 1994. Ethnonationalism. The quest for understanding. Princeton
Gieysztor, A. 1982. Mitologia Słowian. Warsaw
Hodder, I. 1998. Theory and practice in archaeology. London
Joyce R., 2002. The languages of archaeology. Dialogue, narrative and writing. Oxford
Kobyliński, Z. 2002. Archaeology on the ruins of ivory towers: What sort of theory do we need? In Archaeologies of Europe. Histories, methods and theories, P.F. Biehl, A. Gramsch and A. Marciniak (eds), 421-4. Münster
Kołakowski, L. 1981. Obecność mitu. Kraków
Merleau Ponty, M. 2001. Fenomenologia percepcji. Warsaw
Moreland, J. 2001. Archaeology and text. London
Moszyński, K. 1967. Kultura ludowa Słowian. Warszawa
Latour, B. 1996. On actor-network theory: a few clarifications. Internet: http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-i-980i/msg000i9.html
Lech, J. 1995. Social functions of archaeology in the 20th century. In Whither archaeology? Papers in honour of Evžen Neustupný, M. Kuna and N. Venclova (eds), 93—6. Praha
Lévi-Strauss, C. Myśl nieoswojona. Warszawa
Okraska, R. 2001. W kręgu Odyna i Trygława. Biała Podlaska
Rau, M. 2004. Neopogaństwo w Polsce. Internet: http://www.taraka.most.org.pl/pogan/7_pols_7.htm
Southgate, B. 2000. Why bother with history?: Ancient, modern and postmodern motivations. Essex
Strzelczyk, J. i998. Mity, podania i wierzenia dawnych Słowian. Poznań
Szyjewski, A. 2003. Religia Słowian. Kraków
Tomasiewicz, J. 1994. Stare religie nowej ery. Główne nurty współczesnego neopoganizmu. Nomos 5/6
Turkle, S. 1997. Life on the screen. Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York
Urbańczyk, S. 1991. Dawni Słowianie; wiara i kult. Wrocław
Wiench, P. 2005. Neopaganism in Central-Eastern Europe [the electronic version of the paper delivered at the 5th World Congress of Central and Eastern European Studies in Warsaw, 1995 and at the conference "New Religious Phenomena in Central and Eastern Europe after the Fall of Com-munism", Cracow 1995] Internet: http://vinland.org/heathen/pagancee/#Poland